|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Wed Sep 10, 2008 9:03 pm
MegaTherion777 Gravechylde MegaTherion777 Divinus Cruor it has been proven, that's why it became the LAW of gravity. my physics textbook published last year says it's the theory of gravity. maybe mexican scientists use different terminology? volvy - eeeeenteresting *rubs chin* I remember learning it as a law too. Maybe your textbook isn't different because of what Volvy said. are you sure you're not thinking of the law of universal gravitation (which is different, but related, to the theory of gravity)? No, I've always heard it as the law of gravity.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 10, 2008 10:21 pm
Gravechylde MegaTherion777 Gravechylde MegaTherion777 Divinus Cruor it has been proven, that's why it became the LAW of gravity. my physics textbook published last year says it's the theory of gravity. maybe mexican scientists use different terminology? volvy - eeeeenteresting *rubs chin* I remember learning it as a law too. Maybe your textbook isn't different because of what Volvy said. are you sure you're not thinking of the law of universal gravitation (which is different, but related, to the theory of gravity)? No, I've always heard it as the law of gravity. bollocks i say. bollocks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Sep 11, 2008 7:06 am
LOL, Reuters has something to add to your discussion it seems:
http://wptv.wp.pl/wid,10346926,news.html
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Sep 11, 2008 7:13 am
I have usually heard it tought as a law as well. I think it becoming a theory is probably new. Correct me if I am wrong though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Sep 11, 2008 8:08 am
Let me try to judge this.
First, Newton had THEORY of gravitation. What he thought is not true in every case. However, it's true for most applications (for example it's true for our every day life when an apple falls down from a tree), therefore it is a LAW in classical physics/maths.
So basically - you're all right and it depends on the point from which you view this.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Sep 11, 2008 8:42 am
Thats a good explanation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Sep 11, 2008 8:16 pm
kacisko Let me try to judge this. First, Newton had THEORY of gravitation. What he thought is not true in every case. However, it's true for most applications (for example it's true for our every day life when an apple falls down from a tree), therefore it is a LAW in classical physics/maths. So basically - you're all right and it depends on the point from which you view this. ah ha! thank you for that bit of enlightenment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 12:34 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 12:45 am
So...............I've been reading JP Moreland's Love Your God With All Your Mind.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 12:53 am
My Hollow So...............I've been reading JP Moreland's Love Your God With All Your Mind. What's it about?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 1:04 am
Gravechylde My Hollow So...............I've been reading JP Moreland's Love Your God With All Your Mind. What's it about? Moreland saying how everyone need to use their mind to increase intellect- like a muscle. And that every Christian can't shy away from debates and come across as blind faith believers. That we need to have solid, valid arguments for our faith, because they are there. Also explaining why and where ceratin ideas or neglect of certain ideas came about, and how we need to fix these problems. Basically the point of the book is: To grow, one needs to defend the faith and actually have the knowledge and sources to accurately provide proof doing so.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 1:14 am
My Hollow Gravechylde My Hollow So...............I've been reading JP Moreland's Love Your God With All Your Mind. What's it about? Moreland saying how everyone need to use their mind to increase intellect- like a muscle. And that every Christian can't shy away from debates and come across as blind faith believers. That we need to have solid, valid arguments for our faith, because they are there. Also explaining why and where ceratin ideas or neglect of certain ideas came about, and how we need to fix these problems. Basically the point of the book is: To grow, one needs to defend the faith and actually have the knowledge and sources to accurately provide proof doing so. Does it contain these proofs or just like how to present them?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 1:28 am
My Hollow Gravechylde My Hollow So...............I've been reading JP Moreland's Love Your God With All Your Mind. What's it about? Moreland saying how everyone need to use their mind to increase intellect- like a muscle. And that every Christian can't shy away from debates and come across as blind faith believers. That we need to have solid, valid arguments for our faith, because they are there. Also explaining why and where ceratin ideas or neglect of certain ideas came about, and how we need to fix these problems. Basically the point of the book is: To grow, one needs to defend the faith and actually have the knowledge and sources to accurately provide proof doing so. sounds like something i need to read. i'm tired of hearing blind-faith-bible-belt christians tell me, in effect, that i need to believe in jesus because i need to believe in jesus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 7:14 am
My Hollow Gravechylde My Hollow So...............I've been reading JP Moreland's Love Your God With All Your Mind. What's it about? Moreland saying how everyone need to use their mind to increase intellect- like a muscle. And that every Christian can't shy away from debates and come across as blind faith believers. That we need to have solid, valid arguments for our faith, because they are there. Also explaining why and where ceratin ideas or neglect of certain ideas came about, and how we need to fix these problems. Basically the point of the book is: To grow, one needs to defend the faith and actually have the knowledge and sources to accurately provide proof doing so. Kool that sounds like a good book. Perhaps I should read it. I am reading another book by C.S. Lewis: Mere Christianity. That is a good book as well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 3:59 pm
JP is a tough read, granted that book isn't tough just a challenge. Mike, let me finnish it, I only have 4 chapters to go. There's another one I was thinking of for you to read......I'll go ask my mom what the title was.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
