Red Kutai
MistressMinako
I seem to remember it as just a projection. It seemed like the first post by the staff claimed a full-on campaign was run, then came swarf's post, which prompted a recanting from the staff who altered the advertising campaign to just a projection, not actually money spent.
Not that I blame them for wanting a better return, but there were so many flaws in their method that, as a scientist, it physically hurts me to consider what Gaia did when they were on the verge of releasing zOMG.
As I recall, there was DARKNRGY's initial post in the AtA, which implied that they had invested heavily in advertising zOMG!; swarf's thread clarified that it was merely a test campaign (which itself would be more than just a projection); then this thread was released, underwritten by both of those individuals, clarifying that it was initially run like any other advertising campaign, and simply proved unsuccessful. This being the most recent claim and with the greatest deal of consensus attached, I'm inclined to believe it over the other two... sweatdrop
This is where a PR person who can write in a clear, concise manner would come in handy.
The fact remains, though, that projections for zOMG were initially based on faulty numbers. There is no way we could have lived up to the inflated projections from a time when the site was seeing 50K+ accounts signed in at peak usage on a normal day.
Edit: That banner ad is horrible. The composition is off-center and it gives no information about the game. I've seen more compelling ads on TekTek.
Also, lets not discount the fact that now, to even view Gaia's forums, you need to be signed in. At least when with the last login page design (read: "big red button" ) you could preview the forums and see if it was something you'd be interested in.