Krissim Klaw
Some people always take it too far though. In 04 there were users that would say horrible stuff about staffers when they didn't like how the donation items turned out.
lol
If staffers think particular users are stepping over the line, they will deal with it. Personally, one of the things I've always liked about Gaia is that in general staffers often have a turn the other cheek policy when it comes to all but the worst stuff directed at them. There are some sites where if you even seem to be somewhat in disagreement with the staff, you will be banned.
I've seen more users being civil with the discussion than those that haven't. The crux of the uproar isn't about mules. It is about mp manipulation on a grand scale with generated gold that was used to purchase items for exorbitant amounts. This was followed by straight up lies and then finally vague responses/back peddling when they got caught with their hand in the cookie jar.
Chibi Halo
But is it right for them to drag the name of mod accounts through the mud and to post personal off Gaia information of certain people just to prove their side? Discussing the issue, be it this one or any other issue people find wrong on Gaia, and letting all sides in the debate be heard is one thing but telling people to flood inboxes and harass the staff off Gaia (someone actually told people to do that during the early stages of the "revolution" ) is really taking things a bit too far. And how are things fair when the only discussion being allowed in a heated topic like that, or any other similar one for that matter, is only that which agrees with the OP. When you have people jumping all over each other like they have been (it might not be on every single page but it's been happening) then it becomes less of a balanced discussion and more of an "either your with us or get out" kind of a situation.
At the same time, I don't know how they could not see this happen.
Gaia's users are not dumb. I don't know why staffers could dismiss the idea that we would figure it out eventually if they were doing something uncouth. It started off being one sided, and we all know how the public loves a delicious mystery.
Without anything of reasonable value for the userbase to talk about, it's become the equivalent of the grocery-store checkout isle tabloids all around here.
The lesson that Gaia should learn: The userbase is bored and already fired up to epic proportions because of trust issues with Gaia's business. It's all we have to talk about; it's all we
have been talking about. It's already a recipe for disaster so it doesn't take someone with psychic powers to see how the public will latch onto it and turn it into a user vs. Gaia conspiracy. It's not like there is something equivalent to is made in positivity for us to pay attention to, either.
I can't blame the userbase from reacting at all. The irrationality of it is a different story, though. It only makes sense why 133tgate is the hot topic of 2014. Gaia brought it on themselves and put their employees in the line of fire.
Anyway, I know there would have been a completely different reaction if our world wasn't so ********. If things were positive, they were actively working on the economy, if there were things to do and Gaia had achieved the balance we have all wanted for over a decade... ...then this would be water under the bridge. Our world is one big world of negativity with items, now.
Since it's another thing on the "pile of stupid" it's only served to bring down morale of the userbase further, it's further fractured our trust, and this will also be further ignored by Gaia like every other thing that they have done that's messed up the site.
They will just wait for people to stop talking about it instead of giving it real attention. As per usual, and that's one reason why I am personally fired up about it. Gaia's lack of action in the face of negativity has come to be expected, which pisses some people off even more.