babybird
My personal definition is "anyone who isn't Jewish, Muslim or Christian", but since Hindu's and Buddhists probably wouldn't want to be included, I suppose it should be amended to "anyone who isn't Jewish, Muslim, Christian or a follower of an eastern religion or philosophy" It's still a sucky definition, lbut for my uses, it's fine.
"Any religion based on older cultural or ancestral traditions that are not direct offshoots of modern Big Name religions,
or any religion that borrows any of the main tenets of other pagan faiths (e.g. nature worship, magic, animism, totemic practices) while not following any one specific tradition,
or while also borrowing from Big Name religions when the parts borrowed from pagan religions are not included in offshoots or sects of the Big Name religion in question."
So, in general, a Reconstructionist would be pagan under the first definition; a Wiccan would fall under the second one (borrowing from several older religions); someone who mixed, say, Shinto practices with nature worshipping beliefs and magic would fall under the third; but someone like a Kabbalistic Christian wouldn't be pagan even while practicing magic because they legitimately interpret the Bible as allowing that and therefore aren't borrowing.