I would have either killed him or allow him to live only for his prison mates to take 'care' of him. I hope this molester has his balls and his p***s cut off with pair of rusty scissors.
He had had sex with the kid multiple times? How do they know? And how did that happen?
Because the rapist confessed to it. IDK how he gained access to the boy.
That's kinda ******** up, either the father wasn't paying enough attention; or the kid was sneaky and hardheaded. Wonder what happened.
I'm sorry, but are you talking about the prepubescent rape victim?
Op, my bad, you're talking about the s**t stain of a young adult who should never be referred to as a kid because, as we know, declaring someone young and inexperienced in the world is a veritable get-out-of-jail-free card, lest we forget the girl who was drugged and gang raped. Buuuuut according to everyone in town she was just a little slut who should have been careful and, according to CNN, this is just going to ruin that young boy's promising career and it will haunt him for the rest of his life. Poor him. He's a rapist and a child molester, and he's going to be marked as one for the rest of his life.
What's sad is this isn't the only time CNN shows sympathy for these two rapists. I can only hope that the judge in this case also beats the s**t out of the a*****e for thinking he can sue the awesome dad who stopped him mid-rape.
He had had sex with the kid multiple times? How do they know? And how did that happen?
Because the rapist confessed to it. IDK how he gained access to the boy.
That's kinda ******** up, either the father wasn't paying enough attention; or the kid was sneaky and hardheaded. Wonder what happened.
I'm sorry, but are you talking about the prepubescent rape victim?
Op, my bad, you're talking about the s**t stain of a young adult who should never be referred to as a kid because, as we know, declaring someone young and inexperienced in the world is a veritable get-out-of-jail-free card, lest we forget the girl who was drugged and gang raped. Buuuuut according to everyone in town she was just a little slut who should have been careful and, according to CNN, this is just going to ruin that young boy's promising career and it will haunt him for the rest of his life. Poor him. He's a rapist and a child molester, and he's going to be marked as one for the rest of his life.
What's sad is this isn't the only time CNN shows sympathy for these two rapists. I can only hope that the judge in this case also beats the s**t out of the a*****e for thinking he can sue the awesome dad who stopped him mid-rape.
oh, i am in agreement that criminals suing their victims, for whatever reason, needs to stop. all the cases need to be tossed: there would have been no harm had the criminal not been committing crimes against random people.
but i honestly am wondering how the guy got access to the kid, not just once, but multiple times. the logistics of it.
He had had sex with the kid multiple times? How do they know? And how did that happen?
Because the rapist confessed to it. IDK how he gained access to the boy.
That's kinda ******** up, either the father wasn't paying enough attention; or the kid was sneaky and hardheaded. Wonder what happened.
I'm sorry, but are you talking about the prepubescent rape victim?
Op, my bad, you're talking about the s**t stain of a young adult who should never be referred to as a kid because, as we know, declaring someone young and inexperienced in the world is a veritable get-out-of-jail-free card, lest we forget the girl who was drugged and gang raped. Buuuuut according to everyone in town she was just a little slut who should have been careful and, according to CNN, this is just going to ruin that young boy's promising career and it will haunt him for the rest of his life. Poor him. He's a rapist and a child molester, and he's going to be marked as one for the rest of his life.
What's sad is this isn't the only time CNN shows sympathy for these two rapists. I can only hope that the judge in this case also beats the s**t out of the a*****e for thinking he can sue the awesome dad who stopped him mid-rape.
oh, i am in agreement that criminals suing their victims, for whatever reason, needs to stop. all the cases need to be tossed: there would have been no harm had the criminal not been committing crimes against random people.
but i honestly am wondering how the guy got access to the kid, not just once, but multiple times. the logistics of it.
This is never a parents fault. :/ Unless of course he knew about it. How could it have been a parents fault?
I bet that if he killed the monster that the dad would be in prison for the rest of his life.
Doubt it; historically, most governments have held that if you catch someone "in flagrante delicto" (in the act) of a crime (during most of these time periods, it was usually referring to your loved one in an affair with another man, or something of that sort), then you are innocent by reason of temporary insanity. It's basically a heat of the moment type of thing but with actual justification instead of just killing a guy because he punched you first.
Lately there have been idiotic judges letting people sue because they broke into peoles house and got beat up, so if he did kill him I would not be surprised if he got life.
And if I were the one wrongfully imprisoned, I'd sue the judge for all he is worth and leave him with nothing because I'd win.
You'd have a hard time, judges tend to look out for each other, also I don't think you can sue a judge for that.
I would think there's some crime you can sue a judge for if all the evidence in the world points to you being innocent but you're still wrongfully imprisoned.
I don't think so, judicial immunity applies to anything the judge does that is a normal part of his/her job, even if the intent was malicious.
Lately there have been idiotic judges letting people sue because they broke into peoles house and got beat up, so if he did kill him I would not be surprised if he got life.
And if I were the one wrongfully imprisoned, I'd sue the judge for all he is worth and leave him with nothing because I'd win.
You'd have a hard time, judges tend to look out for each other, also I don't think you can sue a judge for that.
I would think there's some crime you can sue a judge for if all the evidence in the world points to you being innocent but you're still wrongfully imprisoned.
He had had sex with the kid multiple times? How do they know? And how did that happen?
Because the rapist confessed to it. IDK how he gained access to the boy.
That's kinda ******** up, either the father wasn't paying enough attention; or the kid was sneaky and hardheaded. Wonder what happened.
I'm sorry, but are you talking about the prepubescent rape victim?
Op, my bad, you're talking about the s**t stain of a young adult who should never be referred to as a kid because, as we know, declaring someone young and inexperienced in the world is a veritable get-out-of-jail-free card, lest we forget the girl who was drugged and gang raped. Buuuuut according to everyone in town she was just a little slut who should have been careful and, according to CNN, this is just going to ruin that young boy's promising career and it will haunt him for the rest of his life. Poor him. He's a rapist and a child molester, and he's going to be marked as one for the rest of his life.
What's sad is this isn't the only time CNN shows sympathy for these two rapists. I can only hope that the judge in this case also beats the s**t out of the a*****e for thinking he can sue the awesome dad who stopped him mid-rape.
oh, i am in agreement that criminals suing their victims, for whatever reason, needs to stop. all the cases need to be tossed: there would have been no harm had the criminal not been committing crimes against random people.
but i honestly am wondering how the guy got access to the kid, not just once, but multiple times. the logistics of it.
Oh, I know, but anyone familiar with the twisted process knows that they usually choose someone they often has access to anyway, so he must know the family.
Lately there have been idiotic judges letting people sue because they broke into peoles house and got beat up, so if he did kill him I would not be surprised if he got life.
And if I were the one wrongfully imprisoned, I'd sue the judge for all he is worth and leave him with nothing because I'd win.
You'd have a hard time, judges tend to look out for each other, also I don't think you can sue a judge for that.
I would think there's some crime you can sue a judge for if all the evidence in the world points to you being innocent but you're still wrongfully imprisoned.
That would be called an appeal.
No, an appeal is not the same thing as a lawsuit.
You don't sue a judge for being wrongfully imprisoned. You file an appeal, is what I mean.
100
100
200
