Blind Guardian the 2nd
castrillo
Blind Guardian the 2nd
Meroko_Love
Blind Guardian the 2nd
Because sexuality has come to constitute personal identity, character and the status of the individual more and more in the past few decades. As such, a perceived union of two individuals who are regarded as being "flawed efforts at being" is of course going to be contested.
The opposition is to institutional recognition of negative existences. In other words, bigotry, but bigotry born from our understanding of sexuality and its role in personhood.
I would argue even more that there is an underlying tone of biological essentialism here that threatens to take away individual autonomy for the sake of eliminating bigotry against non-heterosexuals. It seems to be fueled by the dominant scientific discourse that claims heterosexuality to be the "norm" or "default".
Well, one cannot deny the evolutionary importance of heterosexuality. It cannot help but be a dominant scientific discourse because it's a fundamental reality of natural selection.
Homosexuals are just as important. Maybe the rock you're under didn't get the memo that gays and lesbians still have all their baby batter + same maternal clock.
Speaking in terms of evolution, they are reproductive cul-de-sacs, so, no. If they reproduce heterosexually then that makes the argument for variable sexuality as an evolutionary trait, not homosexuals as historical breeders.
Hardly. Using a surrogate isn't suddenly heterosexual breeding. Well,
literally it is, but the point you were pushing was that homosexuals dont reproduce. And nope, sorry dude, yes they can, they have before and will continue to do so.