|
Like to address a few things your GOVERNMENT is doing.
Many of you wont like what im about to dish out and may disagree with me. That's alright Because that's YOUR FREEDOM OF SPEECH! smile so go ahead.
Ive been seeing some really F'd up things here lately and im not telling by who or how im getting my info because reguardless the government will probably see this but i really don't give a rat's A**. it's my right to speak so they can kiss it. And i didn't wright anything for this ahead of time this is purly as im reading what i got im ranting about it. And ill post what im reading and the links you can go to, to see it yourself.
1. The First item im reading on is "Ohio Teen Arrested After Posing With Gun, Posting Threats On Facebook Following School Shooting"
and here is the article;
MANTUA, Ohio (CBS Cleveland) – Just one day after a school shooting devastated Chardon High School in Ohio, a local teen was arrested after posting a new Facebook profile picture that showed him posing with an assault rifle.
The Portage County Sheriff’s Office apprehended the 17-year-old Crestwood High School student on Tuesday morning, after several concerned citizens called in about the image.
Some of his posts also reportedly raised concerns.
Lt. Gregory A. Johnson of the Portage County Sheriff’s Office told CBS Cleveland that the student had, on multiple occasions, posted status updates that celebrated school violence.
“I’m close to going on a stabbing spree,” one post, written on Feb. 22, said. “I can’t take some of these people anymore.”
“Who agrees with their friend that it’s a good idea to shoot up a school?” the teen wrote just hours after the school shooting that has claimed three lives so far.
Students reportedly expressed concern to school officials, who alerted the local authorities. He was arrested as soon as he arrived on campus.
The student’s social networking page has allegedly since been shut down.
He will now face two counts of inducing panic, one count each of aggravated menacing and telecommunications harassment. All of the charges are first-degree misdemeanors.
At present, he is being held at the Portage/Geauga County Juvenile Detention Facility, and appeared in court on Feb. 29.
Here is the link: http://cleveland.cbslocal.com/2012/02/29/ohio-teen-arrested-after-pictured-online-with-a-gun-one-day-after-school-shooting/ (link has been tested so i know if u copy and paste it, it will work.)
you'll fine 257 Comments to this article.
I'd like to say this about the article. Yes the kid is mad at the world, i don't blame him, im pritty mad to. I really don't care that he had a pic of him and his gun on fb, and i don't mind that he ranted and stuff about it. YOU CANNOT TELL IF A PERSON IS SERIOUS OR JOKEING ON THE INTERNET OR THROUGH TEXT UNLESS THEY POST A VIDEO OR SEE THEM FACE TO FACE!!!! And i believe it was verry wrong the way the police handled the situation. They should have spoken to his parents or have him checked for mental problems. Give him a chance before you ASSUME he is in his right mind guilty and send him to jail. Honestly he shouldn't be in jail. HE SPOKE HIS OPPINION WHICH IF I REMEMBER CORRECTLY WE HAVE THAT RIGHT IN THE CONSTITUTION. THAT YOUR GOVERNMENT IS TRYING TO TAKE FROM YOU THE AMERICAN PEOPLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Goodbye, First Amendment: ‘Trespass Bill’ will make protest illegal.
and here is the article;
Just when you thought the government couldn’t ruin the First Amendment any further: The House of Representatives approved a bill on Monday that outlaws protests in instances where some government officials are nearby, whether or not you even know it.
The US House of Representatives voted 388-to-3 in favor of H.R. 347 late Monday, a bill which is being dubbed the Federal Restricted Buildings and Grounds Improvement Act of 2011. In the bill, Congress officially makes it illegal to trespass on the grounds of the White House, which, on the surface, seems not just harmless and necessary, but somewhat shocking that such a rule isn’t already on the books. The wording in the bill, however, extends to allow the government to go after much more than tourists that transverse the wrought iron White House fence.
Under the act, the government is also given the power to bring charges against Americans engaged in political protest anywhere in the country.
Under current law, White House trespassers are prosecuted under a local ordinance, a Washington, DC legislation that can bring misdemeanor charges for anyone trying to get close to the president without authorization. Under H.R. 347, a federal law will formally be applied to such instances, but will also allow the government to bring charges to protesters, demonstrators and activists at political events and other outings across America.
The new legislation allows prosecutors to charge anyone who enters a building without permission or with the intent to disrupt a government function with a federal offense if Secret Service is on the scene, but the law stretches to include not just the president’s palatial Pennsylvania Avenue home. Under the law, any building or grounds where the president is visiting — even temporarily — is covered, as is any building or grounds “restricted in conjunction with an event designated as a special event of national significance."
It’s not just the president who would be spared from protesters, either.
Covered under the bill is any person protected by the Secret Service. Although such protection isn’t extended to just everybody, making it a federal offense to even accidently disrupt an event attended by a person with such status essentially crushes whatever currently remains of the right to assemble and peacefully protest.
Hours after the act passed, presidential candidate Rick Santorum was granted Secret Service protection. For the American protester, this indeed means that glitter-bombing the former Pennsylvania senator is officially a very big no-no, but it doesn’t stop with just him. Santorum’s coverage under the Secret Service began on Tuesday, but fellow GOP hopeful Mitt Romney has already been receiving such security. A campaign aide who asked not to be identified confirmed last week to CBS News that former House Speaker Newt Gingrich has sought Secret Service protection as well. Even former contender Herman Cain received the armed protection treatment when he was still in the running for the Republican Party nod.
In the text of the act, the law is allowed to be used against anyone who knowingly enters or remains in a restricted building or grounds without lawful authority to do so, but those grounds are considered any area where someone — rather it’s President Obama, Senator Santorum or Governor Romney — will be temporarily visiting, whether or not the public is even made aware. Entering such a facility is thus outlawed, as is disrupting the orderly conduct of “official functions,” engaging in disorderly conduct “within such proximity to” the event or acting violent to anyone, anywhere near the premises. Under that verbiage, that means a peaceful protest outside a candidate’s concession speech would be a federal offense, but those occurrences covered as special event of national significance don’t just stop there, either. And neither does the list of covered persons that receive protection.
Outside of the current presidential race, the Secret Service is responsible for guarding an array of politicians, even those from outside America. George W Bush is granted protection until ten years after his administration ended, or 2019, and every living president before him is eligible for life-time, federally funded coverage. Visiting heads of state are extended an offer too, and the events sanctioned as those of national significance — a decision that is left up to the US Department of Homeland Security — extends to more than the obvious. While presidential inaugurations and meeting of foreign dignitaries are awarded the title, nearly three dozen events in all have been considered a National Special Security Event (NSSE) since the term was created under President Clinton. Among past events on the DHS-sanctioned NSSE list are Super Bowl XXXVI, the funerals of Ronald Reagan and Gerald Ford, most State of the Union addresses and the 2008 Democratic and Republican National Conventions.
With Secret Service protection awarded to visiting dignitaries, this also means, for instance, that the federal government could consider a demonstration against any foreign president on American soil as a violation of federal law, as long as it could be considered disruptive to whatever function is occurring.
When thousands of protesters are expected to descend on Chicago this spring for the 2012 G8 and NATO summits, they will also be approaching the grounds of a National Special Security Event. That means disruptive activity, to whichever court has to consider it, will be a federal offense under the act.
And don’t forget if you intend on fighting such charges, you might not be able to rely on evidence of your own. In the state of Illinois, videotaping the police, under current law, brings criminals charges. Don’t fret. It’s not like the country will really try to enforce it — right?
On the bright side, does this mean that the law could apply to law enforcement officers reprimanded for using excessive force on protesters at political events? Probably. Of course, some fear that the act is being created just to keep those demonstrations from ever occuring, and given the vague language on par with the loose definition of a “terrorist” under the NDAA, if passed this act is expected to do a lot more harm to the First Amendment than good.
United States Representative Justin Amash (MI-03) was one of only three lawmakers to vote against the act when it appeared in the House late Monday. Explaining his take on the act through his official Facebook account on Tuesday, Rep. Amash writes, “The bill expands current law to make it a crime to enter or remain in an area where an official is visiting even if the person does not know it's illegal to be in that area and has no reason to suspect it's illegal.”
“Some government officials may need extraordinary protection to ensure their safety. But criminalizing legitimate First Amendment activity — even if that activity is annoying to those government officials — violates our rights,” adds the representative.
Now that the act has overwhelmingly made it through the House, the next set of hands to sift through its pages could very well be President Barack Obama; the US Senate had already passed the bill back on February 6. Less than two months ago, the president approved the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, essentially suspending habeas corpus from American citizens. Could the next order out of the Executive Branch be revoking some of the Bill of Rights? Only if you consider the part about being able to assemble a staple of the First Amendment, really. Don’t worry, though. Obama was, after all, a constitutional law professor. When he signed the NDAA on December 31, he accompanied his signature with a signing statement that let Americans know that, just because he authorized the indefinite detention of Americans didn’t mean he thought it was right.
Should President Obama suspend the right to assemble, Americans might expect another apology to accompany it in which the commander-in-chief condemns the very act he authorizes. If you disagree with such a decision, however, don’t take it to the White House. Sixteen-hundred Pennsylvania Avenue and the vicinity is, of course, covered under this act.
and here is the link ; http://rt.com/usa/news/348-act-tresspass-buildings-437/
you'll find 139 COMMENTS to this article.
Id like to say i don't understand why they are doing this. the only time protest was violent was because the goverment hired an undercover officer to deliberatly start a violent act just to get protesting banned in the near furtue (aka the near furtur is now) the government is clearly ending your right in the constitution for freedom of speech. It's a discrace to live in this country and this world. Start fighting for your rights people bc they are being tooken right out infront of you. and your being so blind not to do anything about it.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Was Andrew Breitbart murdered by the Obama Regime?
Here is the article:
On March 1, 2012, a notice on breitbart.com said that Breitbart had
died unexpectedly from natural causes earlier that day in Los Angeles.
He was 43 years old. A bystander saw him collapse while on a walk in Brentwood shortly after midnight and called paramedics, who rushed him to the Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center where he was declared dead.
25 People Who Think President Obama Killed Andrew Breitbart
Mr. Breitbart has caused quite a stir among the Leftist in the past few years. The 2009 Acorn Undercover Video Scandal, the resignation of Shirley Sherrod for racist remarks at an NAACP fundraising dinner in March 2010, and just recently at the CPAC convention in Washington DC.
It was at the CPAC convention where Breitbart said he will release video's on Barack Obama because Obama was never properly vetted in the 2008 election. "The videos will greatly affect the 2012 election and I will release them just before November" stated Breitbart.
Breitbart: I Have Obama College Films
Breitbart was married to Susannah Bean, the daughter of actor Orson Bean and had four children that he will leave behind.
Here is a his famous CPAC speech where he threatened the Obama Regime.
Conservative blogger Andrew Breitbart claims he will release film of US President Barack Obama from his college years that will expose the president’s radial and racist roots.
(video posted)
themadjewess.com: I do NOT believe Breitbart died of ‘natural causes’, AT ALL.
He just ‘collapsed?’ With all of the information he had. YEAH RIGHT. The same way everyone around Hillary Clinton ‘just died’ ~SURE.
Breitbart, no doubt has been murdered. By the left. Period. He had videos of Obama from his college days. He knew too much, he was a ‘threat’ to these FKING MURDERERS.
Check out the Clinton body count
Andrew Breitbarts Family thinks he died of a heart attack .
Maybe this weapon brought the heart attack on?
Here is the link: http://members.beforeitsnews.com/story/1837/474/NL/Was_Andrew_Breitbart_Murdered.html
you'll find quite a few comments on the matter and comments is what ya'll should really look at to just as much as the article itself.
id like to say of course he was murdered by the obama Regime. For YEARS anyone who has had dirt on any "corruppted" president has been killed with in days if not hours of it being brodcasted. So it dosn't surprise me that he would be killed off and then it coverd up as a natural death. there was noughitng wrong with the man he was healthy as a horse. This kind of crap is exactly what is wrong with the world. This is the governments way of controlling people. WAKE UP AMERICA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! the government is seriously screwing over your life. do something about it before it becomes to late.To be quite honest i hope those videos do get released, the american people need to see whats going on and what will come to the world if that idiot continuse to stay in office. And after this year THERE WILL BE NO MORE PRESIDENTUAL ELLECTIONS IT WILL BECOME A ONE RULER WORLD AND WE WILL ALL SUFFER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Don't be fooled on what you really are. life experiance shapes you.
 BlueHeartRapture · Sun Mar 04, 2012 @ 02:55pm · 0 Comments |
