Welcome to Gaia! ::

www.conservapedia.org


It's the perfect example of "I don't entirely agree with what this says, and since I utterly cannot stand to be questioned about anything, I'll write the complete opposite and embrace it blindly."



A few choice articles:

http://www.conservapedia.com/Homosexual_agenda

http://www.conservapedia.com/Atheism
(Which despite stale self-embarrassing arguments, isn't as bad as I had predicted.)

http://www.conservapedia.com/ACLU
(Again, not outright as... utterly hilarious as the first, but it's clearly a lot of blind finger pointing. Not that I encourage the same right back, mind you.)



In parts, it does what it claims to do, in presenting a conservative viewpoint of politics and sociology. In others, it utterly begs its self to be clung to by the most ignorant minded in society.


Though, I would call that a problem unto its self. I can't say we don't have those just as awful about blind claims and generalizing insults amongst our own ranks as well. That's.. a discourse for another time, though.

Why do I get the feeling that this is just another work of satire?

It's almost as embarrassing as creationwiki.org.

You're joking. He was trying to use it as a viable source? gonk

I love the little chart at the bottom of the Atheist page. The fact that they think we would want to marry anybody in their families is a bit strange...

People, apparently, would rather marry Charles Manson(a white American) than an Atheist.

I see your racist, close-minded banter and raise you a serious faced emoticon.

neutral