|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 12:36 pm
I was so excited to see that movie! It was awsome. The only complant I have, is that things just moved sssoooo quickly. It was quite confusing. But Since I'd read the book it was cool.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 22, 2007 9:22 am
What are you on about? It wasn't confusing at all. It didn't move to fast the others just moved far too slow.
Anyway I loved it, best one yet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 22, 2007 10:02 am
it was an awsome movie!!!i saw part of it in 3D and it just took my breath away it was wonderful
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 22, 2007 12:53 pm
i really enjoyed it but i think that if you had not read the book, you would find some missing gaps. but it was a good film.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 23, 2007 8:02 am
i didn't read the book (stopped reading the books after the 3rd one), and i definately found there to be gaps. and i agree with the person who said it moved too fast. it was one long string of expensive special effects, and almost no character development. guess i gotta read the book if i wanna see the characters. xp
i thought Jenny was totally short changed in this one, too. was she ever even mentioned by name? did she have a line of dialog longer than a single word? there she is with the main group of six all through the final scenes in the prophecy room, all the others are mentioned or have dialog at some previous point (at least), yet she's just left in the cold. 15seconds of saying hello to her would have been enough for me. but this was wrong. i know (i've been told) the book treats her similarly. but still ... i bet the book uses her name and doesn't say, "oh, and there was another red-haired girl in back of them all."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 23, 2007 3:20 pm
yeah, they keep putting ginny in the background in both the 4th and 5th so that she doesn't look like a completely new character for the next two movies. she plays a much bigger roll in the books. i do wish they put her in the movies more because she is such a great character
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2007 3:36 pm
I loved the movie. Then again I read the books and it's fun trying to see what was skipped.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 28, 2007 10:52 am
The movie was good but as its been said many times there were holes in it, but otherwise the best one yet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xXsoDaPopand_riTaLinXx Vice Captain
|
Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 10:49 pm
The twins weren't in it NEARLY enough. From a non-book point of view the movie was pretty good, but they left SO much out, and some of that stuff is gonna be important later on!!
D<
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 06, 2007 12:12 am
i watch it in premiere... exciting....
HP always on my "must_watch" movie....
love it yay ........... whee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 18, 2007 12:40 pm
i was disappointed with how short Harry's hair was
other than that i loved it
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 18, 2007 4:49 pm
lol, my sister is in love with dan radcliffe and i kept making fun of his hair and she kept defending it. but it wasn't as bad in the movie as it looked in the promos. i guess, to me, all the other stuff in the movie made it not so bad.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
