|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Thu Jun 28, 2007 1:41 pm
I'm not talking about them getting benefits, I'm fine with that... I'm more so talking about when they get the benefits, along with their partner, but married couples don't!!!
Discuss!
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 28, 2007 1:44 pm
Well here's my opinion!
No I don't think this is right! This is almost as bad as affirmitive action and is very judging to sexual orientation which they plunder people for that are against! If their partner can get company benefits, but not your own husband/wife then they are definitely doing something wrong!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 28, 2007 3:23 pm
I agree with you. (wierd...), it's not fair. It is a form of discrimination, giving someone of a certain sexual orientation's spouse benefits a hetereosexual's spouse doesn't get.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 28, 2007 4:58 pm
ummm... i think we're all in agreement... for the first time ever xd
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 28, 2007 8:04 pm
agree ^_^ If everyone is all wanting equality, than that wouldn't work.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 30, 2007 9:51 am
Yeah, everyone argues for equality, but this isn't even close to that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jul 03, 2007 5:45 am
Wow, we all agree, did I step into the Twilight Zone or something *music plays in background!*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jul 03, 2007 3:55 pm
Yeah. and you know what else is wierd? I'm watching the Twilight Zone right now...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jul 03, 2007 10:28 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 04, 2007 10:10 am
Excuse me, but who says they're getting benefits and marriage couples aren't? Can you offer some proof of this please? Documentation?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 05, 2007 6:50 pm
WTF? You're really asking for proof? Is it that hard to believe with all the minorities getting beneifts? Honestly, I don't want proof, because we don't need it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 06, 2007 10:19 am
After affirmitive action, I wouldn't think anyone would need proof...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 07, 2007 12:47 am
RenFlower After affirmitive action, I wouldn't think anyone would need proof... Yeah when I go to the hospital I would like the doctor that scored the best to get through college, not the one who got in on minority, it seem that is discriminates against the white male now...what a twist biggrin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 07, 2007 8:20 am
Right! It's like saying, sorry but we can't take in our school because your white amd we already have to many of you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:18 am
Gelasius Excuse me, but who says they're getting benefits and marriage couples aren't? Can you offer some proof of this please? Documentation? I did a report on it, it doesn't take much to find it, I forgot the company name, but Apple Computers use to do it then quit shortly after because most of their programmers were heteros and married
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
