|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sat Nov 20, 2004 6:07 am
As you all know. Bunnah is going to be banned. So I have created this thread for the soul purpose of saving him.
Bonnie and Teikou Even though Streek and I have both proven them wrong are going to Band Bunnah for actions he did not do.
This is Unjustified and Childish.
Post your opinion here.
No swearing, fighting or DELETING OF POSTS allowed.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 20, 2004 6:14 am
I don't see any benefit to the guild if Bunnah was banned.
He is a constant member here and generally is entertaining.
Not everyone was clear on Shy's prediciment.
I don't know the story on the deleted posts, but hey, who doesn't lie to get their arse out of trouble.
If he is banned we'll lose a lot more people.
Maybe there should be a group vote instead of just a few people. This guild was paid for by most of us so maybe we should have equal shares in what happens to it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 20, 2004 6:15 am
I saw those posts with my own eyes, you are wrong. Just because fireyz deletes them, doesn't mean they never existed. I have never lied for years and I'm not lying now when I say bunnah did make disrespectful posts in shy's thread. Even now on page 3 his comment to delete the thread was disrespectful. That hasn't been deleted and that's good enough proof 3nodding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 20, 2004 6:16 am
1. I've seen those posts and I'll just state one more time that I'm 100% sure they were in Shy's thread, and that's just disrespect to someone crying out for help.
2. My reasons were perfectly justified and I have done so in Bunnah's thread, more than enough.
3. 'Saving' someone is hardly justification for what Bunnah's done and why he shouldn't be banned. I had deleted your thread because you weren't accepting my point of view in replies.
4. You and Streek have not proven us wrong. You merely stated that you thought it was in some other thread and asked if I was sure it was in there. I am. That, again, isn't defence or proof that the threads weren't made.
5. I am not banning Bunnah for spamming or laughing in Shy's thread, although that is now part of it. I'm banning him for making his topic completely denying such posts in Shy's thread, and accusing me of making the whole thing up, unreasonably.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 20, 2004 6:17 am
Teikou I saw those posts with my own eyes, you are wrong. Just because fireyz deletes them, doesn't mean they never existed. I have never lied for years and I'm not lieing now when I say bunnah did make disrespectful posts in shy's thread. Even now on page 3 his comment to delete the thread was disrespectful. That hasn't been deleted and that's good enough proof 3nodding I never said they didnt Exist. but Streek and i have both Said they where Either in a different thread or posted OFF topic as a part of a conversation Myst Streek and a few other people where having on that thread.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 20, 2004 6:20 am
fire_eyez 5. I am not banning Bunnah for spamming or laughing in Shy's thread, although that is now part of it. I'm banning him for making his topic completely denying such posts in Shy's thread, and accusing me of making the whole thing up, unreasonably. If i Accused you of something in this thread. Would you Ban me?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 20, 2004 6:22 am
WarriorShadow fire_eyez 5. I am not banning Bunnah for spamming or laughing in Shy's thread, although that is now part of it. I'm banning him for making his topic completely denying such posts in Shy's thread, and accusing me of making the whole thing up, unreasonably. If i Accused you of something in this thread. Would you Ban me? That depends on whether it was true, to what extent, circumstances, the manner in which you did it, reasons you had for doing it, amongst other things. And I'm sorry, but that's not enough to back up Bunnah.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 20, 2004 6:27 am
fire_eyez WarriorShadow fire_eyez 5. I am not banning Bunnah for spamming or laughing in Shy's thread, although that is now part of it. I'm banning him for making his topic completely denying such posts in Shy's thread, and accusing me of making the whole thing up, unreasonably. If i Accused you of something in this thread. Would you Ban me? That depends on whether it was true, to what extent, circumstances, the manner in which you did it, reasons you had for doing it, amongst other things. And I'm sorry, but that's not enough to back up Bunnah. im not backing bunnah up. I am simply Letting people know he is going to be banned. and letting them Post there opinions. like chrissie said Banning someone of his Involvement in the Guild for any reason should be up to the Whole guild, Every one who has contributed to the guild by Donating and Joining. Not just the Administrators and the Moderators.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 20, 2004 6:29 am
Chrissie-T I don't see any benefit to the guild if Bunnah was banned. He is a constant member here and generally is entertaining. Not everyone was clear on Shy's prediciment. I don't know the story on the deleted posts, but hey, who doesn't lie to get their arse out of trouble. If he is banned we'll lose a lot more people. Maybe there should be a group vote instead of just a few people. This guild was paid for by most of us so maybe we should have equal shares in what happens to it? Lying and denying the posts, as Streek had, is forgivable. Pretending it never happened and turning it around to make it look like he was victimized by me isn't. WS is editing a poll back into this, I assume, but it won't be official. We can't all vote on issues like this because it isn't practical, and then, what's popular isn't always right and vice versa. We've all voted for mods and that's what they're here for.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 20, 2004 6:31 am
WarriorShadow im not backing bunnah up. I am simply Letting people know he is going to be banned. and letting them Post there opinions. WarriorShadow So I have created this thread for the soul purpose of saving him. WarriorShadow like chrissie said Banning someone of his Involvement in the Guild for any reason should be up to the Whole guild, Every one who has contributed to the guild by Donating and Joining. Not just the Administrators and the Moderators. See my post for that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 20, 2004 6:40 am
fire_eyez We've all voted for mods and that's what they're here for. In that case let the "Crew" as they are named in the Member list. all 5 of them vote.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 20, 2004 6:45 am
WarriorShadow fire_eyez We've all voted for mods and that's what they're here for. In that case let the "Crew" as they are named in the Member list. all 5 of them vote. That's one of the reasons I'm giving Bunnah 24 hours, to talk to the rest of the mods as well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 20, 2004 6:48 am
Yes, the mods are here to watch over the guild and make sure nothing gets out of hand. But the banning of a member affects the whole group on a new level and should be taken to the group.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 20, 2004 6:53 am
Chrissie-T Yes, the mods are here to watch over the guild and make sure nothing gets out of hand. But the banning of a member affects the whole group on a new level and should be taken to the group. Exactly, and Bunnah has really gone out of hand this time in his thread. Everything affects the whole group- a new rule, new mods, new members. We can't all vote for everything, it just isn't practical.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 20, 2004 6:59 am
We don't vote on the deletion of thread, or the removal of posts. But we all paid and the banning of a member is a huge thing. We happily let the mods take control of most situations because we acknowledge the fact we voted them in and we need them there to keep control of things, but the effects the banning of bunnah will have is huge.
Surely you can forsee the huge issues it will cause? The rift that is sure to occur once he is gone? Why break up the AA?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
