|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eccentric Iconoclast Captain
|
 Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2007 2:19 pm
I think most people will agree that ought to be and that ought to be .
However, those aren't enough. Suggest more irregular diphthongs!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2007 6:21 am
...we could use as (as in the Faroese "havn")
(I really don't understand this bracketing scheme yet, so forgive any idiocy I may appear to create with it...it is unintentional)
-shamelessly proud Scandinavian- xd
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2007 2:38 pm
I don't really have any suggestions for irregular diphthongs... That's never been a strong point for me. I tend to stick with logical ones that make sense without having to be memorized. I'm fine with and as EI suggested, though. I'm not sure how that one sounds. neutral
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 4:57 am
close to the 'ow' in gown, but much softer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eccentric Iconoclast Captain
|
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2007 9:15 am
I think he meant that he was unsure of his opinion on it. mad D
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2007 11:52 pm
Actually, you're both right.
1. I wasn't sure what the diphthong sounded like.
2. I wasn't sure if it was a good idea.
Either way, I'm still not too sure. sweatdrop
This collaborative conlang thing has died down to a smolder now. sad
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 01, 2007 12:29 pm
What about ? How would that sound?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 22, 2008 7:24 am
Like, 'wo' in 'wrote,' minus the 'r.'
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
