|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2007 5:03 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2007 5:25 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2007 5:54 pm
Yessir, got it for a hell of a deal too. They usually run about $700, got it for $330.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2007 6:05 pm
Quote: I'm the only person left in the world that doesn't own a digital camera... i don`t own one eather,badass bass you got there,man!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2007 6:59 pm
wow thats beautiful. ur lucky man.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2007 3:10 pm
wow...that bass is hot...i need to print these pictures and take them to my room for further studies...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2007 7:05 pm
Now THAT is a thing of Beauty biggrin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 10:07 am
It looks nice..
But does it sounds good too? surprised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 11:28 am
Fuzzysham It looks nice.. But does it sounds good too? surprised Hell yeah bro, essentially like an EBMM Stingray. I'm digging it hard. I'll post some sound clips when I get a chance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 12:00 pm
beautiful, is it your first 5-string?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 12:28 pm
BassMann95 beautiful, is it your first 5-string? Yeah, I usually stick to 4-strings (I have 3), but I decided I needed a bass with some extended range for some covers my new band is playing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 4:39 pm
angrymalazar Yessir, got it for a hell of a deal too. They usually run about $700, got it for $330. Nice!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 8:07 pm
nice
don't worry don't have a digital camera niether
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2007 10:37 am
My camera is broken and still being fixed its taking ages. I like the bass, though I would never play out of two 15s, when a 4x10 stack as way more speaker area then that, and would sound way less muddy and have a way faster response and have less chance of exploding. The bass is nice though I think that it was a good deal I love the red and the pick gard so sexy. heart
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2007 3:50 pm
flowergirl01 My camera is broken and still being fixed its taking ages. I like the bass, though I would never play out of two 15s, when a 4x10 stack as way more speaker area then that, and would sound way less muddy and have a way faster response and have less chance of exploding. The bass is nice though I think that it was a good deal I love the red and the pick gard so sexy. heart That's why I play through a 4x10 and a 1x15, the 4x10 and it's tweeter cover my mids and highs while the 1x15 covers my lows, nice for the low B, should I decide to keep it instead of stringing it with the high C. If you're playing through 8x10s, it doesn't matter how much speaker area you have, each speaker plays the same frequencies, so your lows are going to be lacking somewhat compared to a rig with 1x15, or hell, even a 1x18.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
