|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SimpleSimples Vice Captain
|
 Posted: Wed May 23, 2007 12:49 pm
We require your feedback;
You can comment on whatever, attitude of mods, format and layout, wording, lack of role playing rules....etc.
You can complain, suggest or just leave a comment saying what you like...that'd be a real self esteem booster... whee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue May 29, 2007 4:36 pm
I just have to say that Blueraven, you did a good clean up job. I don't even see a trace of the old set up here except for the basics that we decided to keep
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu May 31, 2007 6:23 am
Sorry, but this is a complain/suggestion. I the battles the pages are taken up quickly. We might save a few pages (and some time) if people didn't have such large signatures. I think we shouldn't post with our sigs in here. (Like so)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu May 31, 2007 1:58 pm
Steel Cat 007 Sorry, but this is a complain/suggestion. I the battles the pages are taken up quickly. We might save a few pages (and some time) if people didn't have such large signatures. I think we shouldn't post with our sigs in here. (Like so)
Sounds fair, I'll add it to Battle Thread construction as strong advice. I will also turn off the sigs of those in a battle if they leave it on.
|
|
|
|
|
|
BlueRaven990 Vice Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2008 9:32 pm
I have a concern, with the two pets Creepy and Arthur. They give the same stats and cost 1600 gold difference. I would waive this if arthur had a good enough attack for that, but Creepy's ability is better, yet he costs less. If I may, as former owner of this guild, I suggest that Arthur's stat bonuses be bumped up to +4 or +5 each and maybe +120 Hp and MP to compensate for the 1600 gold difference, otherwise everyone would downgrade to Creepy and have an auto revive every battle. I would also say that either STR or SPD be added to the 1d12 attack so that people are more inclined to spend 4000 on him
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
