|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Thu May 10, 2007 9:11 am
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1590395/posts
Do you think this editorial makes good points?
1. Is Roe likely to be overturned?
2. Would it be so bad if control over abortion was returned to the individual states?
2. Should America be alarmed at declining birthrates?
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu May 10, 2007 10:15 am
Wow, what a bunch of wackos...
0. It doesn't make many points at all.
1. I'd say no, but:
2. I think that's a better option. Plus, some states *would* ban abortion if this were the case. Unfortunately, given party lines, these are probably not states I'd want to live in.
2 #2. Not overall, and as for some birthrates declining faster than others, not unless you're a racist. What's wrong with Latino and African immigrants? I like European cultures and languages, and I don't want them to disappear, but I doubt they ever would. People adapt. They're capable of being bilingual. French culture is not superior to Eritrean culture, nor vice versa.
I would say the one "good" thing about abortion is the decline in birth rate. Of course, that's the same "good" thing about the Ebola virus. I wouldn't wish either on anyone.
I just wish people would think more globally and learn to put on a damn condom.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu May 10, 2007 1:32 pm
well, makes sense in a way. I mean it's hard to believe that political figures are more moral now then they were 35 years or so ago. These restrictions that are 'threatening' to change abortion laws are likely more about the money then about doing the right thing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
