Welcome to Gaia! ::

Reply Extended Discussion
Spare the Rod, Spoil the Child? *read, think, post, NOW* Goto Page: 1 2 3 [>] [»|]

Quick Reply

Enter both words below, separated by a space:

Can't read the text? Click here

Submit

Corporal punishment, effective means of discipline?
  yes
  no
  depends
  undecided
View Results

llo_OllO_oll

PostPosted: Sat May 05, 2007 2:11 pm


rules(read AND obey)
1. No flaming or insulting. You don't agree with someone say? Fine, say why, but be mature about it
2. Follow the ED rules (Kaze has a neat little thread about them)
3. English is your friend, enough said.
4. One line statements like "I agree" or "that’s stupid, lolz" are not appreciated.
5. Please provide proof and sources for your claims, especially if they involve statistics.
6. Please explain the thought behind your reasoning. I don't mind if you write a lot, as long as it is full of quality information.
7.Obey the crew members
8.Follow the basic rules, as well.

definitions

Corporal punishment: physical punishment, such as spanking or a slap on the wrist, inflicted on a child by an adult in authority.

Spanking: To slap on the buttocks with a flat object or with the open hand, as for punishment.

Debate

The purpose of this thread is to discuss the use of corporal punishment at home. Generally there are three seperate views on this issue.

Those against spanking a child believe:
- that it can lead to agression in the child, they also believe that it teached children at young age that violence is the answer.
-They also point out that treating an adult the same way is illegal, and it is not any more moral to spank a child than it is an adult.
-They also view it as an innefective punishment, as it is temporary.
-And they feel that it creates a lack of trust between child and parent

Those in favor Feel:
-parents have the right to raise children as they will
-feel that spanking is temporary and does not cause physciological harm, whereas a struggle for power between child and parent can.
-Point out there is no solid evidence linking corporal punishment with overly aggresive behaviour in children
-Feel the recent decrease in corporal punishment has lead to an increase of behaviour problems

Those in favor of a minimal use of spanking feel:
-Some believe it should only be used if the child does something particularly dangerous
-Children have different temperments, and it is only effective for some children
-It is not abusive, but should only be used if all other forms of punishment are not as effective for the situation
-The form of punishment used should depend on the situation

Please discuss
-Is it an effective form of punishment?
-Which view point is the most correct?
-(for those who are pro or minimal) at what age should it stop?
-Can corporal punishment cause long term physciological problems?

Please remeber to obey all rules, and to support your arguements 4laugh

P.S (This is aimed at crew members, all you regular people ignore this) If my OP is missing anything, or is not satisfactory, please inform me so I can make any neccesary changes.

Sources: exclaim
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spanking#Controversy
http://www.google.com/Top/Society/Issues/Children,_Youth_and_Family/Corporal_Punishment/
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/spanking
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/corporal punishment
PostPosted: Sat May 05, 2007 4:54 pm


I personally am completely for it. A pecking order NEEDS to be established in a home, period, and spanking is an effective means to accomplish it in early childhood. The fact is, parents need to take a more disciplinary role in their child's life; they aren't supposed to be your friends, they are your parents, your caregivers, your guardians-- it's their job to discipline you and prepare you for life, not go and be your "buddy." A perfect example, someone that I know got their parents to buy them beer for the prom after party recently. And why did the parents consent? Because they knew that their child would be drinking anyways, so they figured that they might as well be in on it.

Yeah... that doesn't work! If you know your child will be drinking at an after party, you ******** don't let them go to prom! Again, a pecking order needs to be established, in, and outside of the home. A lack of discipline on the part of the parents is also responsible for all of these little "gangsters" and "emo/goths" running around, disrespecting authority figures and sending common courtesy to Hell in a hand basket. All parents have to do is say no, refuse to let their children wear those clothes, instill some respect for chivalry in them, etc.

But, in today's age of political correctness where everyone's opinion is equal and wot, we can't have that, now can we? Of course not! Well guess what? Not everyone's opinion is valid and parents ought to be stepping all over their kid's freedom of expression when it gets out of hand like that. I said it before and I shall state it again, they are your parents, not your friends, raising you properly should be their first priority, not buying booze for your after party.

Care to argue? One of my teachers spanks his 5 and 6-year-old daughters when they refuse to do what he tells them to. Now, all he has to do is start counting down from three, and they'll be, for lack of a better term, obeying him in a heartbeat. And the thing is, it works! He's established a pecking order, his daughters know their place, and do they think any less of him for it? No! They love him all the same and are perfectly healthy as far as their mental state is concerned. How do I know? I see them every Saturday for two hours!

So, in conclusion, Corporal punishment is really necessary in the household, especially in this day and age. Though I personally was never spanked (Yes, I'm a little goody two shoes. Deal with it), it certainly doesn't hurt if it is deemed appropriate in a child.

Kazemuki
Captain


Raven11492

PostPosted: Sat May 05, 2007 5:04 pm


Hitting the child should be a last resort if punishment like grounding the child does not work mabey a smack or two will set the child straight
PostPosted: Sat May 05, 2007 5:38 pm


Raven11492
Hitting the child should be a last resort if punishment like grounding the child does not work maybe a smack or two will set the child straight

So in-depth! I really get where you're coming from! -_-

Justify your answer.

Kazemuki
Captain


Raven11492

PostPosted: Sat May 05, 2007 5:41 pm


Shouyou Kaze
Raven11492
Hitting the child should be a last resort if punishment like grounding the child does not work maybe a smack or two will set the child straight

So in-depth! I really get where you're coming from! -_-

Justify your answer.


I dont think i need to justify my answer if the child keeps on doing the same bad things over and over and the child doesnt care about being punished the only other way is too hit the child then the child will be too scared to do anything bad
PostPosted: Sat May 05, 2007 5:45 pm


Raven11492
I dont think i need to justify my answer if the child keeps on doing the same bad things over and over and the child doesnt care about being punished the only other way is too hit the child then the child will be too scared to do anything bad

This is the ED. If you do not justify yourself, then get the ******** out. I don't care if you cite authorities or personal experiences, just post more than two sentences when you're participating in a debate.

Kazemuki
Captain


Raven11492

PostPosted: Sat May 05, 2007 5:48 pm


Shouyou Kaze
Raven11492
I dont think i need to justify my answer if the child keeps on doing the same bad things over and over and the child doesnt care about being punished the only other way is too hit the child then the child will be too scared to do anything bad

This is the ED. If you do not justify yourself, then get the ******** out. I don't care if you cite authorities or personal experiences, just post more than two sentences when you're participating in a debate.


Alright take it easy I just dont feel like typing alot today dont worry ill post more than two sentences tommorow
PostPosted: Sat May 05, 2007 5:50 pm


Sorry, I'm not yelling at you, mad at you, whatever. I just get touchy when my ED standards aren't met... especially in a guild like this. *gets back on topic now*

Kazemuki
Captain


llo_OllO_oll

PostPosted: Sun May 06, 2007 6:55 am


Raven11492
Shouyou Kaze
Raven11492
I dont think i need to justify my answer if the child keeps on doing the same bad things over and over and the child doesnt care about being punished the only other way is too hit the child then the child will be too scared to do anything bad

This is the ED. If you do not justify yourself, then get the ******** out. I don't care if you cite authorities or personal experiences, just post more than two sentences when you're participating in a debate.


Alright take it easy I just dont feel like typing alot today dont worry ill post more than two sentences tommorow


Please do, Raven. I would love to hear why you feel it is harmful too spank a child to often, and when you deem it appropriate to spank a child. In fact, I would be thrilled to get as many different opinions on this matter as possible. 3nodding

And Shoyou, thank you for your wonderful reply. One thing though, I am curious: at what age do you feel corporal punishment should be stopped? To what severity is spanking appropriate; open hand, ruler, what? And when do you think that corporal punishment is appropriate over something like grounding, or do you feel its up to the parents to decide?
PostPosted: Sun May 06, 2007 8:03 am


terrabakachan
And Shoyou, thank you for your wonderful reply. One thing though, I am curious: at what age do you feel corporal punishment should be stopped? To what severity is spanking appropriate; open hand, ruler, what? And when do you think that corporal punishment is appropriate over something like grounding, or do you feel its up to the parents to decide?

Age limit: 10 or 11
Severity: Open hand unless they're Satan's spawn razz
When it is appropriate: Up to parental digression

Kazemuki
Captain


llo_OllO_oll

PostPosted: Sun May 06, 2007 10:26 am


ohh... someone voted no. I would love to hear your view point, seeing as to how everyone who has posted so far is at least partially in favor of it. (including me)

To actually add something to the thread (so Shoyou Kaze doesn't bite my head off for only posting one sentence stare blaugh )

Personally, I probably fall under the "minimal" category. My parents never spanked me or my brothers and sisters, and that worked for us. However, I know some parents who make me think "just spank them all ready, that'll wake em' up"

On the other hand, I do feel that it is better to use a non physical punishment when ever possible. If you spank your child too often, or for silly reasons, a child may be less likely to come to you if they are in trouble. Yes, the parent is the boss, but their should be a level of trust and even respect for the child.

To me, it seems ideal to use spankings only on the occasion. An method of discipline is most effective when its used rarely. Lets say your toddler manages to escape out of the house and runs across the street, worried, you run after him/her. You managed to catch her. You COULD explain why its bad "you could get hit" and give her a time out. Problem is, that punishment is no more severe than if her where to pull his sisters hair, or if he threw his vegetables. In his/her mind, there needs to be a distinction, something that lets him know "I did something worse than pulling hair". A slap on the wrist sends that message. It also allows him to associate running across the road with pain.

Sometimes children can also get very unruly and out of control. Sometimes they will throw unusually bad temper tantrums, and a slap on the butt or the wrist may be the only way to get them to stop.

Imagine, you're in the supper market and your child wants to get the new spider man action figure, you say no though. For whatever reason, he has been praticularily fiesty that day, and suddenly he starts to throw a fit. Screaming and yelling and kicking, and knocking cereal off the shelf. You threaten him with time out, doesn't work, you threaten to take away his leftover piece of birthday cake, doesn't work, you threaten to take his "The Hulk' action figure, doesn't work. Frustrated, you attempt to pick him up (which isn't fun with his little fist flailing) so you give his butt a firm smack. Startled, he stops his screaming.

In the above circumstances (and others like them) corporal punishment can be an effective (or even the most effective) tools for discipline. In my experience, however, I do find that the more it is used, the less effective it is when used.

In conclusion, corporal punishment can be an effective part of raising some children. However, it is important to be aware that it is not the best means for all children, and using it to much will lower it effecieny. It is also important to govern yourself so that you do not hurt them severly or leave a mark.
PostPosted: Sun May 06, 2007 10:36 am


I wouldn't bite your head off, silly! I'm a vegetarian! I would; however, relieve you of it with my katana. biggrin

Quote:
To me, it seems ideal to use spankings only on the occasion. An method of discipline is most effective when its used rarely. Lets say your toddler manages to escape out of the house and runs across the street, worried, you run after him/her. You managed to catch her. You COULD explain why its bad "you could get hit" and give her a time out. Problem is, that punishment is no more severe than if her where to pull his sisters hair, or if he threw his vegetables. In his/her mind, there needs to be a distinction, something that lets him know "I did something worse than pulling hair". A slap on the wrist sends that message. It also allows him to associate running across the road with pain.

Pain association... a technique used in Brave New World. When applied correctly, it works wonders; however, if one applies the method incorrectly, it will just mentally scar and debilitate your child for a good ling while.

Quote:
In conclusion, corporal punishment can be an effective part of raising some children. However, it is important to be aware that it is not the best means for all children, and using it to much will lower it efficiency.

Nonsense, pain never looses its effectiveness, that's one of the beauties of it! The human mind is coded to avoid it at all costs, end of story. Your children might resent you for excessively spanking them, but they'll always respect your authority for it.

Quote:
It is also important to govern yourself so that you do not hurt them severely or leave a mark.

And that is why you use pressure points! Incredibly painful, yet no marks and generally no lasting effects! biggrin (I'm joking for those of you who think I'm some sick, child-beating, sadist.)

Kazemuki
Captain


llo_OllO_oll

PostPosted: Sun May 06, 2007 11:17 am


Shouyou Kaze
I wouldn't bite your head off, silly! I'm a vegetarian! I would; however, relieve you of it with my katana. biggrin

No! you discovered my one true weakness! Curses, while no motorcycle of metal pole is a match for my thick skull, a katana is to me as a wooden stake is to a vampire. (analogies for the win)
Shouyou Kaze

Pain association... a technique used in Brave New World. When applied correctly, it works wonders; however, if one applies the method incorrectly, it will just mentally scar and debilitate your child for a good ling while.

Which is why should be careful you don't hurt them too severly, and you should never strike a child in rage. Besides which, it is just as easily to scar (or at least alienate) your child through other punishments like time-outs or yelling as it is to scar them through a spanking. I myself have never been close, nor truly liked my father for this reason. Call me shallow, but memories of him pinning me to the wall and yelling in my face(and emmiting lots of spit) don't give me warm fuzzy feelings.
Shouyou Kaze

Nonsense, pain never looses its effectiveness, that's one of the beauties of it! The human mind is coded to avoid it at all costs, end of story. Your children might resent you for excessively spanking them, but they'll always respect your authority for it.

au, contraire, I find that it does. Or, in the very least, their is a difference between the effectiveness when someone uses it often versus very rarely. If a a child parent hardly ever spanks them, and in the middle of a tantrum, they do get spanked, they are going to be more startled into obedience than a child who is used to it, who, because they are prepared for the punishment, just like they are prepared to lose their leftover slice of birthday cake, may not care. If I was 8 again, and being a particularily bratty, and my mom (who hardly ever spanked me) gave me a good *slap*, I would take more notice and think about it, more than I would if she sent me to my room (which to me, was worse than a spanking) simply because what she did was unusual and a different form of punishment.

I am still hoping someone who thinks "no" will post, simply for the diversity
PostPosted: Sun May 06, 2007 4:24 pm


I say that spanking is permissable, but only in certain circumstances- lying, mainly.

*doesn't have much else to say*

Ruingaraf
Vice Captain

Reply
Extended Discussion

Goto Page: 1 2 3 [>] [»|]
 
Manage Your Items
Other Stuff
Get GCash
Offers
Get Items
More Items
Where Everyone Hangs Out
Other Community Areas
Virtual Spaces
Fun Stuff
Gaia's Games
Mini-Games
Play with GCash
Play with Platinum