Welcome to Gaia! ::

Science and Beyond- The Science Guild

Back to Guilds

A guild where you come to share ideas or get help on anything science related! 

Tags: science, fiction, help, share, discuss 

Reply Science and Beyond
Science and Religion Goto Page: 1 2 3 ... 4 5 6 7 8 [>] [»|]

Quick Reply

Enter both words below, separated by a space:

Can't read the text? Click here

Submit

A or B
  A?
  B?
View Results

Fatal Crescent

PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 10:47 pm


Hello! I was wondering, on the usual debate of Science versus Religion, who is right? Well, right in the sense of the world, I mean...well, you know, it's hard to explain. But anyway, which is it that has more credibility? Sciences or Religion?

(In no way am I dissing Christianity, Buddhism, or any other religion out there. I just want an opinionated answer)
PostPosted: Wed Apr 25, 2007 12:10 am


Wellll... I think that there is not right or wrong for either - science could be used to support religion - - or not support it... blaugh
So like with most everything different prevails. Pick a side... I personally have a very strong spiritual faith in "God" and some of the philosophies and beliefs that I have been exposed to - including Christianity - Judism - Budism - but I also find science fascinating... I think that Religion is more of a history and science topic than not and should not be viewed as Science vs. Religion - but as how can religion be examined along with science. 3nodding
Have you seen the movie - "What the bleep do we know?" confused xd
Break down matter into atoms - then break down atoms - into energy - "ideas - thoughts" and so ultimately there is not matter - only the thought of it - Can we control matter with our minds? Can we shape the world through thought? rolleyes

sbpoofer


VoijaRisa

PostPosted: Wed Apr 25, 2007 7:26 am


I think the two are completely compatible. They cover entirely different things. Science covers the physical world. Religion the spiritual.

The only time that we really get trouble, is when one or the other stars overstepping their bounds. Science does this with grand claims in terms of some branches of quantum physics (string theory especially). Religion does this whenever it starts making factual claims about the physical world (such as saying the Earth is 6000 years old).

Unfortunately, religion overstepping its bounds is far more dangerous than anything science does. The reason is that religion attempts to assert itself at base levels (ie, get into elementary school classes) which undermines all of science for the entire nation. Meanwhile, when science starts getting too creative, it makes it into science fiction books, pop-sci magazines, and graduate courses.

When it comes to the physical world though, science wins hands down every time. You have to be a complete nut case to say otherwise (I'm thinking of Kent Hovind in particular). Meanwhile, when it comes to the spirit, science doesn't stand a chance.


sbpoofer
"What the bleep do we know" was a horribly incorrect movie. Most of the movie was either highly distorted science, or outright lies. Many of the scientists interviewed have since protested that their interviews were taken out of context to support an argument with which they did not agree.

Rather, the film is meant as an introduction to a cult involving the psychic lady that showed up in the film, claiming she channels an ancient warrior God.
PostPosted: Wed Apr 25, 2007 12:49 pm


Well I don't think anyone has a monopoly on truth.

I think Science does an excellent job explaining the physical universe. I think nothing in science is absolutely true (all theories are continualy refined as we get more and more information, and make new observations).

I always saw Science is the fractured pieces of a mirror, it shows something very clearly but you can't see the whole picture. Whereas religion always seemed more like a big foggy mirror, trying to see the big picture but very blurry on the details.

I think religion does an excellent job of covering matters of faith, and that faith is and should be a very important part of peoples lives. Most religions lay down excellent rules for maintaining a harmonious society, and tellin people to treat each other decently (I always find it sad when people use religion for the opposite purpose, but I think that has more to do with human nature than what any major religion I have looked into says). I do not in fact think science would have been able to develop if it were not for the stabalizing influence of religion on society.

As far as making claims about the physical Universe religion has a very very poor track record and thus poor credibility. (if anyone wants to contest this I can start a new thread and post ~ 100 examples with lots of factual proof to back them up)

I think it is natural for religion and science to overlap since they are both an attempt to explain everything. Religion looks at the big picture and tries to intuitivly (or with divine guidance as some would say) grasp the truth of existance and apply it to everyday life. When there wasn't such a thing as science around (or when it was very young, chemistry started out as alchemy which was pretty mystically influenced) it made sense for religion to try to explain everything since that was the best tool we had for doing so.

Science on the other hand starts with observation. You try to understand how things work bases on your observations, then you create an experiment to see if you can generalize those understandings to a broader range of situations, then you have to be able to repeat, to show that these observations do indeed hold. Once you begin to really understand something with science you have a very clear idea of how it functions with relation to you, although you may not understand the big picture (we understood the basic laws of motion a long time before Einstien came up with relativity, which in turn showed that all of our basic equations of motion were in fact incorrect [or at least imcomplete]). Theories of course just start out as ideas and sometimes science goes out on a far limb when someone makes a theory that cannot be falsified at present (Some theories we just don't have to technology to design experiments to test, and some like string theory keep getting redone [refined] around even after their first several predictions have been shown to be false).

And of course we can't really take the human element out of this. Both science and religion get massive funding, and are run by fallible human beings who enjoy the prestige and power their positions bring them. Religion wields huge influence over everyday peoples lives without regard for nation, wealth, or race, and it does this because of the positive role it plays in their lives. Science likewise has huge power because of its excellent track record in making accurate predictions (although bad science has led to scientists making more than a few bad ones as well). Science has a tendany to lead to very useful technology (like airplanes and television and computers). The problem with science is that very few people overall have enough background and training to understand it, and scientists like anyone else can let preconcieved notions color their opinions, beliefs, and work. So on most important topics special interests can get a "scientist " to come up with an explanation for whatever they want and through out enough technical stuff to confuse anyone without the knowledge to make the decision for themselves. (the moon hoax thread really brought this point home to me, especially the part about personal beliefs since initially I wouldn't even consider the argument for it being a hoax before responding.)

In conclusion the world is complicated and confusing. Both religion and science have a place in it. Science is generally correct about physical phenomena, but you better know something about it yourself or you might be being decived by a salesman in a lab coat.

Jad-Hoven


Fatal Crescent

PostPosted: Wed Apr 25, 2007 8:49 pm


Hmm...it's kind of like:

BIG PICTURE > Religion

and

Science < BIG PICTURE

right?
PostPosted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 8:22 am


I think religion should stay within their territory of spirituality.

The problem is that religion was a leading instance on spiritual and political and other surfaces... They had to shape a reality that a Midieval citizen had to understand.

Science now has taken the place on determing how the world funtions around us.

Ndude


sbpoofer

PostPosted: Fri Apr 27, 2007 11:20 pm


VoijaRisa
I think the two are completely compatible. They cover entirely different things. Science covers the physical world. Religion the spiritual.

The only time that we really get trouble, is when one or the other stars overstepping their bounds. Science does this with grand claims in terms of some branches of quantum physics (string theory especially). Religion does this whenever it starts making factual claims about the physical world (such as saying the Earth is 6000 years old).

Unfortunately, religion overstepping its bounds is far more dangerous than anything science does. The reason is that religion attempts to assert itself at base levels (ie, get into elementary school classes) which undermines all of science for the entire nation. Meanwhile, when science starts getting too creative, it makes it into science fiction books, pop-sci magazines, and graduate courses.

When it comes to the physical world though, science wins hands down every time. You have to be a complete nut case to say otherwise (I'm thinking of Kent Hovind in particular). Meanwhile, when it comes to the spirit, science doesn't stand a chance.


sbpoofer
"What the bleep do we know" was a horribly incorrect movie. Most of the movie was either highly distorted science, or outright lies. Many of the scientists interviewed have since protested that their interviews were taken out of context to support an argument with which they did not agree.

Rather, the film is meant as an introduction to a cult involving the psychic lady that showed up in the film, claiming she channels an ancient warrior God.


eeekkk--- interesting. Well out of context for selfish purposes - using religion or science for money and power - - What else is new?? So take out the movie - -
There are studies in health and medicine with the power of prayer speeding or enabling recovery. Laughing = better health & longer lives.
@Jad - yeah the human element - it sure screws stuff up - but also makes life interesting!!! rofl
PostPosted: Sat Apr 28, 2007 5:15 am


sbpoofer
VoijaRisa
I think the two are completely compatible. They cover entirely different things. Science covers the physical world. Religion the spiritual.

The only time that we really get trouble, is when one or the other stars overstepping their bounds. Science does this with grand claims in terms of some branches of quantum physics (string theory especially). Religion does this whenever it starts making factual claims about the physical world (such as saying the Earth is 6000 years old).

Unfortunately, religion overstepping its bounds is far more dangerous than anything science does. The reason is that religion attempts to assert itself at base levels (ie, get into elementary school classes) which undermines all of science for the entire nation. Meanwhile, when science starts getting too creative, it makes it into science fiction books, pop-sci magazines, and graduate courses.

When it comes to the physical world though, science wins hands down every time. You have to be a complete nut case to say otherwise (I'm thinking of Kent Hovind in particular). Meanwhile, when it comes to the spirit, science doesn't stand a chance.


sbpoofer
"What the bleep do we know" was a horribly incorrect movie. Most of the movie was either highly distorted science, or outright lies. Many of the scientists interviewed have since protested that their interviews were taken out of context to support an argument with which they did not agree.

Rather, the film is meant as an introduction to a cult involving the psychic lady that showed up in the film, claiming she channels an ancient warrior God.


eeekkk--- interesting. Well out of context for selfish purposes - using religion or science for money and power - - What else is new?? So take out the movie - -
There are studies in health and medicine with the power of prayer speeding or enabling recovery. Laughing = better health & longer lives.
@Jad - yeah the human element - it sure screws stuff up - but also makes life interesting!!! rofl


Oh yes. Fallible as we may be, we humans make life interesting! 3nodding

Fatal Crescent


Gioiama

11,550 Points
  • Nudist Colony 200
  • Megathread 100
  • Bidding War 100
PostPosted: Sat Apr 28, 2007 10:49 am


No right, no wrong.

Science try to give for each thing, each phenomen, a logical reason. Science is knowledge.

Religion try to keep Science outside, it explain each thing in relation with one or many gods. Religion is just a stupid thing to believe in a god where no one try to explain otherwise. Religion is a good thing for those high-placed that can have money, power, and a very good life compared to the one that believe on something that not exist.

It's my point of view, just mine. yours is similar or just backward in time...
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2007 10:43 am


Miss TiramiZu
No right, no wrong.

Science try to give for each thing, each phenomen, a logical reason. Science is knowledge.

Religion try to keep Science outside, it explain each thing in relation with one or many gods. Religion is just a stupid thing to believe in a god where no one try to explain otherwise. Religion is a good thing for those high-placed that can have money, power, and a very good life compared to the one that believe on something that not exist.

It's my point of view, just mine. yours is similar or just backward in time...

perhaps or maybe forward?? - - Or culturally influenced - - politically & power driven at times??? Religion is not good if left to those idle with money and power - - = war - repression - Who would change their point of view if threatened by death - -

sbpoofer


Gioiama

11,550 Points
  • Nudist Colony 200
  • Megathread 100
  • Bidding War 100
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2007 3:10 pm


I preffer certainly have knowledge in a world of science, even if there are some wars, in place of living in a religion world, with no knowledge, and no science.

Because religion is just a matter of ignorance, and a matter of no access to books, to the truth. With no instruction or school, or just a modification of it, for be in the way of what the religion want to be.

Overall, don't even forget than religion cause wars, cause millions of deaths in the humanity story, and cause also deaths because of the unknowledge, or because of what the religion don't want to show (inquisition is a part ot it, burn-kill pretended sorcerer and magicians, or simply the people who discovered some things the religions cannot allow, the fact that the earth is not the center of the universe, or that the earth is spheric... )

All parts of the new knowledge, quite almost of the religions reject them. And it's certainly religion (especially one) fault is AIDS is getting more damage in some part of the world (Pope say "no condom"...)
PostPosted: Thu May 03, 2007 4:28 pm


It seems that many people have confused science with religion.

But, the Bible actually speaks of scientific facts that was already written before Christopher Columbus realized that the Earth was round.

The Bible has verses pointing out that the Earth is round and all these other things. I am looking for the verses right now, so don't expect evidence just yet.

YHVHApostle


YHVHApostle

PostPosted: Thu May 03, 2007 4:34 pm


Here's one. Remember how doctors just a few centuries ago thought that bleeding the patients would help them with certain diseases? Well, the verse already states that blood is important, and that bleeding someone would rather kill the person in most cases:

The book of Leviticus (written prior to 1400 BC) describes the value of blood.

Leviticus 17:11
‘For the life of the flesh is in the blood, and I have given it to you upon the altar to make atonement for your souls; for it is the blood that makes atonement for the soul.’

Yes, I dragged this from a website, so don't think I'm plagiarizing.
PostPosted: Thu May 03, 2007 5:00 pm


In my own opinion, science is the only thing that makes sense. Also, religion is just a way of controlling people (not like brainwashing, okay?). Religion was made during a time when mankind was ignorant and primitive. Also, it's a cause for many disputes in history. For example:
Nothern Ireland
the Spanish Inquisition
9/11
The Crusades
The Divine Right of Kings
Witch Trials in Europe and Asia
the perpetuation of slavery
The Dehumanization of other religious believers(and non-believers)
The Subjugation of Women
The refusal of some parents to give their children medical treatment, relying only on prayer and faith-healers
the supression of science and indeed reason itself
the decades of violence in the Middle East
capital crimes against Women's Health care
the war terror that we are currently in now

See, the Bible potrays God as all-loving, all-knowing, and all-powerful. But when you look at society now, and read the bible closely, you'll notice that this is false. If God allows children to get cancer, sick men to rape women, and people attacking us, then he allows evil. So either he isn't all loving, so he doesn't care, he isn't all powerful, which means he can't do anything about it, or he isn't all knowing, meaning he doesn't know about it. You can have two outta three, but you can't have all three. There are many other ways to bust religious questions. For more info, go to youtube.com and search for An Atheist Answers Common Religious Questions. This is the source for my examples.(just wanted to say that so it isn't copyright or something sweatdrop )

RaventhePenguinNinja

4,150 Points
  • Tycoon 200
  • Money Never Sleeps 200
  • Brandisher 100

Jad-Hoven

PostPosted: Thu May 03, 2007 9:51 pm


EternalSoul_175
It seems that many people have confused science with religion.

But, the Bible actually speaks of scientific facts that was already written before Christopher Columbus realized that the Earth was round.

The Bible has verses pointing out that the Earth is round and all these other things. I am looking for the verses right now, so don't expect evidence just yet.


Yes but the bible also states things as fact which can in fact be proven untrue.

For example Human being have 24 ribs (12 sets) in both males and females. This is directly observable and testable (if you bother to look at a skeleton, people had some taboos against this in certain cultures in the past).

The biblical story of the creation of woman states that men will have one less set of ribs than women...
Reply
Science and Beyond

Goto Page: 1 2 3 ... 4 5 6 7 8 [>] [»|]
 
Manage Your Items
Other Stuff
Get GCash
Offers
Get Items
More Items
Where Everyone Hangs Out
Other Community Areas
Virtual Spaces
Fun Stuff
Gaia's Games
Mini-Games
Play with GCash
Play with Platinum