|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2004 1:33 pm
Alright, I've just heard on the news that some ******** is actually selling a book that's supposed to be like a dictionary for leet with new terms that were even more retarded than our current ones. That, and they're giving leet a new name: Weblish. Or some dumbass name like that.
Is this some pile of crap or should I just string my shoelaces around my neck now?
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2004 5:09 pm
Swallow your toes and roll down the hill.
Weblish. lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2004 5:19 pm
Lilith Tsutomo Is this some pile of crap or should I just string my shoelaces around my neck now? They've had them on the Internet for a while now, but I never realized that the abomination would be in print. ******** me hard. I'm going to join you up there, so make some room. eek
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2004 5:51 pm
No. No; no; no. They might as well print an acronym dictionary as well. I can see that in the near future; it'll be called Newspeak. gonk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 14, 2004 3:48 pm
Mouse Pachinkorelli No. No; no; no. They might as well print an acronym dictionary as well. I can see that in the near future; it'll be called Newspeak. gonk That'd be doubleplusungood, comrade Mouse. (I just got the part of O'Brien in my school's upcoming production of 1984, on an ironic note.) Meh, it'll be horrible if they're trying to be serious. However, they could well be doing it as a joke: Making a dictionary of 1337 and 12-year-old AOLer talk just to make fun of it. Tounge-in-cheek sorta thing, you know? Like the Worst Case Survival series, or the Real Ultimate Ninja book, and such. If that's the case, I'm cool with it, 'cause it'll likely be hilarious to read.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 14, 2004 10:53 pm
There is a dictionary of the sorts here in Poland.
But it's not as much fun as English.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 14, 2004 11:12 pm
Sir Magnor Criol That'd be doubleplusungood, comrade Mouse. Tripleplus ungoodly. whee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 16, 2004 2:02 pm
nsudino Sir Magnor Criol That'd be doubleplusungood, comrade Mouse. Tripleplus ungoodly. whee 'Tis tripleplus ungood indeed... gonk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 19, 2004 6:32 pm
Mouse Pachinkorelli No. No; no; no. They might as well print an acronym dictionary as well. I can see that in the near future; it'll be called Newspeak. gonk WAR IS PEACE FREEDOM IS SLAVERY IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 05, 2004 12:08 pm
Krivin Mouse Pachinkorelli No. No; no; no. They might as well print an acronym dictionary as well. I can see that in the near future; it'll be called Newspeak. gonk WAR IS PEACE FREEDOM IS SLAVERY IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH Oh Jeebus. The Newspeak bit of 1984 was the most retarded thing I have ever read. I appologize to Orwell fans, but it drove me mad. >___<
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 05, 2004 4:45 pm
Squinchy Oh Jeebus. The Newspeak bit of 1984 was the most retarded thing I have ever read. I appologize to Orwell fans, but it drove me mad. >___< Ah, I do believe that was the point of Newspeak: to drive us so-called intellectuals insane!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 08, 2004 9:47 pm
Gambol Squinchy Oh Jeebus. The Newspeak bit of 1984 was the most retarded thing I have ever read. I appologize to Orwell fans, but it drove me mad. >___< Ah, I do believe that was the point of Newspeak: to drive us so-called intellectuals insane! We think in words. We have pictures, too, but words are our labels, our comprehension. Newspeak limited the language. It actually got smaller every day, instead of bigger as languages are wont to do naturally. By limiting the words available to the people, a sort of thought control was thus implemented.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 10, 2004 8:13 am
L337 doesn't even require a dictionary. . .
:: shakes head :: I think we should kill the moron. L337 is just English using symbols and numbers. As for new terms, yee-freakin-haw. Who cares? Everybody makes up new s**t in L337 everyday, and thinks it's the most astounding thing ever. rolleyes
Yes. Killing the man marketing this for a profit is definitely the best plan. 3nodding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 30, 2004 5:37 pm
I agree with Sir Magnor Criol. I find it simply mindboggling that anyone can be so stupid. It has to be a joke, or the universe is on the verge of imploding.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 31, 2004 12:00 am
Egads. Newspeak was the worst part of 1984 - made worse by the fact that, through s**t like L337, people are inducing the mind-control bit voluntarily half a century later.
Let's string the creator of L337 up by shoestrings.
Sparkly, curly shoestrings. It's less dignified that way.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
