|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 4:10 pm
Sooo... which one do you prefer? Classic Kane or Classic Undertaker?
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 5:06 pm
I thought It'd be clear by now what's with Undertaker beating Kane in TWO, not one, but TWO Wrestlemanias. Come on.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 4:24 am
true. undertaker's better!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 10:32 am
i like kane better but undertakers not bad so i would go for kane but it think undertaker is better or maybe... gonk i cant choose
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 6:31 pm
I have to say that i like classic Kane better. I like the red and black gear better than his current look. Plus, undertaker really hasn't changed that much, besides the fact they dropped the urn and master stuff.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 6:56 pm
Armads the Doom Bringer I have to say that i like classic Kane better. I like the red and black gear better than his current look. Plus, undertaker really hasn't changed that much, besides the fact they dropped the urn and master stuff. Yeah, the American Badass/ Big Evil gimmick is basically the same as his current gimmick. Yeah, completely similar.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2007 12:51 pm
classic kane cause he was wwe Champion for one night then stone cold beat him the next night xd i think wwe tries to make it seem like he never won it
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 12, 2007 9:47 pm
Uh both
OR
Classic undertaker is AWESOME....YEP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
