|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 6:23 pm
Allright, I'm gonna make this quick and simple. You all have read the books obviously or else you wouldn't really be here. If you have any Questions you can contact me via pm. Rules are relatively easy, if there are any problems or if they are well too how we say leniant then we can make a subforum or whatever. problem solved.
1. Keep it Redwall related ( examples for those who need them: no magic, species divergent from those in the series...)
2. No God Modding ( Sincerely Hate that )
3. Well there is obviously a story but I'd prefer if you didn't just rampantly just go around killing. Gore is allowed though just not too much.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 3:05 pm
What of Emporer Ublaz "Mad-Eyes"? Didn't he have a magical power?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 3:18 pm
Ublaz did how we say have a power. He could basically control other creatures simply by looking into their eyes. I wouldn't really consider it a special thing though as Martin the Second was unaffected by this trick of his. In short it probably only works on well dim witted creatures.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 3:23 pm
I don't recall him even attempting it on Martin. However, how could you say that a serpent of any kind, in terms of Redwall, is dull-witted?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 3:26 pm
Well, if I remember right, the serpent that killedUblaz was a small one. At least in comparison to Asmodeous and other such serpentlike creatures like Deathcoiler. Plus, i believe the idea comes from a snake charmer. Though, I agree that you can't call a serpent dull witted but lizards and snakes belong to the same group and some of them might actually fall in that boundary when you read the books.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 3:47 pm
You have a point there. However, wasn't the coral snake he charmed near the beginning of the book a particularly large specimen?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 4:51 pm
I haven't read the book in awhile, but I think it was just a long snake really. Not a big one. I'd have to read it really. Been so long. I'm working on mossflower right now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 5:09 pm
I hated Tsarmina. She was so stupid! Gingivere would've done a better job than her! I tend to judge a Redwall book on how formidable the enemies are, and she was pitiful.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 5:15 pm
Two words for her. Mentally insane. Hard to believe she was related to the other wildcats almost. I judge a book based on the heros and plot.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 5:16 pm
Ungatt Trunn is my favorite; the only character in all of Redwall (as far as I know) to have wielded a trident. To think Tsarmina is his niece is revolting to me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 5:24 pm
Really? I thought there was more. Sagitar and her Trident rats. That has to give it away. It was a nice idea to make them related, but the way Tsarmina acted in comparison was a bit hard to believe. She was a good laugh though...occasionally.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 5:28 pm
Oops, I forgot about the trident rats. Oh well, Sagitar was a two-faced coward. Ungatt Trunn could've taken them all single-pawed. As far as I know or can tell, he is the only villain to have conquered Salamandastron, however briefly. He was also very clever, using his army to create cunning illusions to scare his foes, and it was effective.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 5:33 pm
It would depend on what you would consider as capturing though. I mean others have breached the walls and gotten inside the mountain, but he was clever in the trick to amke the stars vanish. Plus he met a well cool death.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 5:45 pm
In all actuality, he may not have died. He could've washed up on shore somewhere and lived out the remainder of his life. It kind of leaves his fate to the imagination, and I like that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 5:48 pm
But doesn't he become paralyzed when Brocktree does whatever he does? If that's the case, he'd have a miserable life.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
