|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sat Feb 24, 2007 8:55 pm
Ok, I really don't know how to say this, but does anyone know for sure if there are more elements (not sub elements). Because I've thought up a theory about elements.
My theory is that there are 4 groups of elements and 5 stages:
Groups contain the exact opposites and affiliates:
Group 1 (Natural): Earth Air Fire Water
Group 2 (personal): Physical Mental Energy Void
Group 3 (Sense): Sight Illusion Sound Silence
Group 4 (Animate/Summons): Total Reality Perception into Reality Faith Science
Group 5 (Constant) biggrin ark Light Time Space
Stages are the steps the base element can move or evolve into:
Stage 1 (Instant): Earth Physical Sight Total Reality Dark
Stage 2 (Intangible): Air Mental Illusion Perception into Reality Light
Stage 3 (Pure): Fire Energy Sound Faith Time
Stage 4 (Absence): Water Void Silence Science Space
I would love to hear any and everyone's criticism. Please help me modify my theory. There are many flaws and I would love some help and opinions.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 25, 2007 9:29 am
What do you think about stuff like electricity? Do you consider it an element on its own, or a combination of air and fire?
Btw. Time isn't constant. 3nodding It's elastic depensing on its environment. For example, time goes so slow it's almost at a complete stop inside a nebula.
Time also goes faster as you move faster, so the closer you travel to the speed of light, the faster your time goes by compared to the time for everyone else. So exploiting this, you'd be able to travel forward in time.
So I think time maybe should be included in the same group as perceptions. That, or Group 5 could be renamed. (If you ask me, just about nothing in the universe is truly constant, unless you count the cycles themselves as a constant). Or I dunno.
Anyways, it's an interesting way to group things together. I like it. Just needs tweaking. mrgreen
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 25, 2007 10:55 am
I'm confused. How can Earth evolve into Air then Fire then Water? Aren't all the elements their own and cant evolve into a different element? How can any of these elements evolve into another? Aren't they all their own separate element?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 25, 2007 4:07 pm
Knola What do you think about stuff like electricity? Do you consider it an element on its own, or a combination of air and fire?
Btw. Time isn't constant. 3nodding It's elastic depensing on its environment. For example, time goes so slow it's almost at a complete stop inside a nebula.
Time also goes faster as you move faster, so the closer you travel to the speed of light, the faster your time goes by compared to the time for everyone else. So exploiting this, you'd be able to travel forward in time.
So I think time maybe should be included in the same group as perceptions. That, or Group 5 could be renamed. (If you ask me, just about nothing in the universe is truly constant, unless you count the cycles themselves as a constant). Or I dunno.
Anyways, it's an interesting way to group things together. I like it. Just needs tweaking. mrgreen Isn't electricity a sub element? ^^ Oh thanks. I really didn't know what to name group 5 and all of them seemed kind of constant. sweatdrop What should we rename it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 25, 2007 4:12 pm
Lunaki3 I'm confused. How can Earth evolve into Air then Fire then Water? Aren't all the elements their own and cant evolve into a different element? How can any of these elements evolve into another? Aren't they all their own separate element? Stages are the evolutions. Groups are alike elements or elements that occur naturally together and naturally oppose one another. That's the theory, at least.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 25, 2007 4:18 pm
What I don't understand is how any of these elements can evolve into another element. I understand the groups but not the stages.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 25, 2007 4:56 pm
My comment is a little off topic but here it is anyway.
Electicity is considered a sub element because it is not created on it's own. It's the difference/friction or conflict between air and earth. Electricity moves from earth to air and it passes through everthing else. The strength of electricity depends on how much of a difference there is between earth and air. After electricity balance comes between earth and air.
I have my faith but I combine it with science. You'd be surprized at how much they suport each other. Though many refuse to acknowledge it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 25, 2007 6:14 pm
Starla Tendimowa My comment is a little off topic but here it is anyway.
Electicity is considered a sub element because it is not created on it's own. It's the difference/friction or conflict between air and earth. Electricity moves from earth to air and it passes through everthing else. The strength of electricity depends on how much of a difference there is between earth and air. After electricity balance comes between earth and air.
I have my faith but I combine it with science. You'd be surprized at how much they suport each other. Though many refuse to acknowledge it. I didn't think I'd ever meet anyone else that combined it with science! I knew I wasn't the only one but...YAY! ^^
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 25, 2007 6:17 pm
Lunaki3 What I don't understand is how any of these elements can evolve into another element. I understand the groups but not the stages. I guess thy don't evolve, but are some what related. I would love to have help to develope this theory or completely disprove it. So if you want to modify it, go ahead. Sorry for the confusion. sweatdrop
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 25, 2007 7:16 pm
MeakoSneezes Starla Tendimowa My comment is a little off topic but here it is anyway.
Electicity is considered a sub element because it is not created on it's own. It's the difference/friction or conflict between air and earth. Electricity moves from earth to air and it passes through everthing else. The strength of electricity depends on how much of a difference there is between earth and air. After electricity balance comes between earth and air.
I have my faith but I combine it with science. You'd be surprized at how much they suport each other. Though many refuse to acknowledge it. I didn't think I'd ever meet anyone else that combined it with science! I knew I wasn't the only one but...YAY! ^^
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 25, 2007 7:30 pm
Starla Tendimowa MeakoSneezes Starla Tendimowa My comment is a little off topic but here it is anyway.
Electicity is considered a sub element because it is not created on it's own. It's the difference/friction or conflict between air and earth. Electricity moves from earth to air and it passes through everthing else. The strength of electricity depends on how much of a difference there is between earth and air. After electricity balance comes between earth and air.
I have my faith but I combine it with science. You'd be surprized at how much they suport each other. Though many refuse to acknowledge it. I didn't think I'd ever meet anyone else that combined it with science! I knew I wasn't the only one but...YAY! ^^ Which one?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 25, 2007 7:44 pm
Sorry. She left. We can just talk here. I don't have long though. Feel free to PM me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 12:41 pm
thats a pretty sound theory but i wouldnt classify them as elements i would classify those as staets of being and plains of existence.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 6:51 pm
WitchyBoy thats a pretty sound theory but i wouldnt classify them as elements i would classify those as staets of being and plains of existence. Could you explain that for me? I'm kinda confused. sweatdrop
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 9:19 am
well to me time flows paralell to each other so those are plains of existence and as for states of being things can be of the light or of the dark.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
