|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 3:23 pm
I just wanted to get everyones oppinion.This is a thread for everyone even if you dont have kids yet
things to disguss do you believe in vaccsinating children? yes/no and please explain why did your parents get you vaccsinated when you were a child? dose the fact that your parents did/didnt vaccsinat you as a child effect the way you feel about this subject? who much is to much?(in other words to you feel that childeren should only be vaccsinated for some things and others no? explain) if you dont have kids do you think your oppinion has anything to do with the fact that you dont have kids?explain
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 3:45 pm
Ok I guess I will go first.
This is a subject that I am a little torn on first let me say that I do have childeren 3 in fact and the main reason I am so torn on this subject is to put it simply my twin sister.
To start with we were raised in differnet households with two different mothers (long story begans and ends with adoption) my mother was very animate on making sure I was vaccsinated on time every time until I was about 15. Where as on the other hand my sisters mother was totally aginst haveing her vaccsinated after she was about 3. Now I know she had her reasons money being a big one of them and pride being another one. See I am by no means saying that i was raised with money because that wasnt the case at all it just that my mother chose to take me to the heath department for my vaccsines were they dont charge a cent for them were as her mother just simply wouldnt step foot in a place like that due to her pride.
Now so far this whole vaccsination buissness has started a small war between me and my sister because I have chosen to vaccsinate my childeren for the simple fact that I believe it is what is best for them. She on the other hand has NO childeren and is so aginst the whole idea its not even funny any more. Now I do agree with her on some points because lets face facts people in the US today are so over medicated its unreal. As a socity we just keep throwing meds at every problem that comes up and its gotten to the point were our bodies cant even fight off anything on its own. That is why I have elected to only get my kids serten vaccsines. So far they have only had buster shots and they have been vaccsinated against measuls and the mumps. Because in my oppinon its some times good for a kid to get sick it gives their body the chance to fight for its self.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 8:04 pm
It's vaccinations, btw. wink
1) I don't think the vaccination is a belief issue. Personally? I do think it's stupid and irresponsible to not vaccinate your children, but it's the family's choice.
2) Yes, I was vaccinated
3) My parents choice didn't play an impact.
4) The ONLY vaccination I'm iffy on is the varieccella (chicken pox). My ped said a booster is in the works currently. I did choose to vaccinate my son for it because shingles runs in my family and it can reduce the outbreaks. Which it's the only vaccine (besides the flu) I would consider opting out. However, my husband has seen babies who had whooping cough and died from it and other of these diseases. It's not pretty.
I know as a mother, I would never forgive myself if my child died because I could easily have prevented it by getting over my soapbox.
I do not equate the diseases vaccinations exist for remotely on the same level as overmedicating and common cold sicknesses. It's not hard to turn down medications if you chose not to medicate. I'd never want to expose my child to hepatitis just so it gives "their body the chance to fight for itself." Personally, the "homeopathic" remedies people use can be just as bad as the prescription medicines.
And the crap about autism being caused by vaccines is ludicrious. They don't even know the CAUSE of vaccines and simply put, autism just happens to present itself at the same time vaccines are given. The risks of vaccines, to me, FAR outweigh the nasty diseases and their risks. We travel and are only a few hours from Mexico, so I refuse to take the risk.
There are optout forms to sign for schools. The other problem is parents don't bother educating themselves (I know so many who can't even name the vaccinations their children receive) and point the blame game.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 1:04 am
Growing up, in elementary school and the like, I always got the vaccinations with the other kids. I think we got shots for Hepatitis A and/or B? We got them in high school too.
When I went to Japan in the summer of 2003, we had to get vaccinations for certain diseases, and we had to have medical insurance. I don't travel much, but if I did more traveling, I would want to make sure I get vaccinated and am protected against diseases in other parts of the world.
My mother found out in the summer of 2006 that she has breast cancer, and so she wants me to also get a shot to protect against HPV, which is the leading cause of uterine cancer (it's also the virus that causes genital warts, but I'm not sure whether or not she's aware that it's also an STD ninja ). So I will be getting that vaccination at some point as well.
When I have children one day, they will be getting their boosters and shots. Until scientists can prove that certain diseases and disorders are caused by specific vaccinations, then I will continue to allow my children to get vaccinated. Like Luna, I don't think it has anything to do with beliefs either.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 12:50 pm
I am one of those moms that wants my kid to get dirty and collect germs so he will build immunities against them and be healthy but that doesnt mean I dont want him to have vaccines, I was also sceptical about the varicella because it is so new there is no telling if getting it will cause him to at higher risk for shingles when he is older. He did get it because it is required for school though. I have educated myself on the side effects of the vaccines just so I was prepared. Of course my kid has never shown any side effect from any of them not even a fever. the only one I really opt out for is the flu shot because I got it once and was sick as a dog for a week and my dad is the same way. With that track record in my family I would rather just have the flu risk and deal with that if it comes.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 4:40 pm
I do get all of your points but I do know people who chose not to vaccinate their children because of their religious belifes and I also know people who chose not to vaccinate their kids because of their own personal belifes. And I would like to clarify(because Im not trying to come out looking like the bad parent for not fully vaccinating my kids) the reason my kids have not had their hep A/B shots is because tthey are to young to get them and the reason they havent had other shot is because they have gotten vielently ill from the few vaccines they have had with the exception of booster shots.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 4:48 pm
Quick question who many of you out there know what the vaccines your children are getting are made of? If so dose it bother you in any why knowing that they are putting that into your childs body?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Feb 23, 2007 8:30 am
However, in order to get the BOOSTERS, you have to get the inital vaccine. wink It's different if your child has problems like allergies to eggs, thus cannot receive certain vaccines. So which is it? Your kids have "violent" reactions or you want your kids to develop natural immunities to polio, etc?
The way you worded the question, you mean religious beliefs, not do I believe vaccines work. The science is there and unless you're an idiot who believes science is out to get you and is the anti-God, they work--point blank. On average, it tends to be a choice, not religious beliefs that cause people not to get their children vaccinated.
I think you need to research the timeframes for Hep B. Your children can receive that one at birth. Also, some of the "boosters" are the same dosage as the first vaccine, the reactions just subside as they get used to it. http://www.immunize.org/catg.d/when1.pdf http://www.vaccineinformation.org/tetanus/qandavax.asp
No, it doesn't bother me the ingredient they put in. Research is the key. At least you can positively look up what's in the vaccines. Those famed homeopathic "remedies" that people claim are better aren't even FDA regulated, approved, etc. They could have rat feces in it and you could be putting that in your child's body. Yes, the FDA makes mistakes, but the companies that release those homeopathic remedies have ZERO liability if you get sick. Really, I think that arguement is weak. There's alloted amounts for bugs, eggs, droppings for our food. Bottom line, crap goes in our bodies everyday. You can't put your kids in a bubble and control their breathing, eating, defecating (although some wacko parents would love that). It'd be one thing if these vaccinations were to "control" our children, good grief, they're not. Hopefully, the myth that aborted fetii are in vaccines will not be brought up.
Another good site for reading: http://www.autismvox.com/the-vaccine-autism-urban-myth/
About mercury in vaccines: http://www.cdc.gov/od/science/iso/concerns/thimerosal.htm
Also, more information about the ingredients: http://www.cdc.gov/n**/vaccine/components/additives.htm
Really, I recommend reading the CDC's website about vaccines. If your children had that bad of a reaction to the vaccines, you are entitled to compensation (depending on how "severe" the reaction was). The great thing is now, you do have control over how much and when your children get immunized. They have the combined ones or you can spread them out individually.
It's your choice to not vaccinate and take the risks with your children, why should you care if people think you are a "bad parent"? I'd come off as a "bad parent" to those who chose to not vaccinate, who cares. Do what you want, but get educated. I don't care what a family does for themselves as long as they don't put MINE at risk. It's the choices we make, bottom line.
And an add, no I don't think it's right for schools to lie and use scare tactics liek saying your kid can't attend school without vaccines. A lot of people don't know they can opt out for whatever reason (WY you can write your own exemption). For us, my husband being military and medical profession, he gets exposed to illegal immigrants and diseases on a daily basis. It's vital to have a good repetoire with your pediatricians and finding a good middle ground, even if it means spending more money. Generally, the reasons they are "mandatory" is because by doing it this way, states can fund vaccines so low-income families don't have to shell out hundreds, even thousands of dollars on vaccines they normally couldn't afford.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 25, 2007 3:53 am
Yes, I defiantly believe in vaccinating children. I know that some things may not work but in the long run, it's better to be safe than sorry, right? Mike was vaccinated against chicken pox as a kid and he never got it. I was vaccinated against a whole bunch of stuff and the only thing I've ever got was chicken pox xP
I was kept up to date on every shot and booster I needed.
I think it's wrong not to get your children their shots and vaccinations, personally. It's worse to get something like measles than to get a simple shot for it.
Kids should be vaccinated against anything that could be life threatening, I think. Chicken pox can be dangerous if you get it later in life. My mom got it when she was in her early to middle thirties and she had it really, really bad, I remember.
I will defiantly get my kids vaccinated to whatever is available if they are healthy enough to do so.
The only problem is the HEP A and B shots is that you need to get them at a certain age, mos school systems require it. And it's a very dangerous thing to get so it's much better to get the shot than to get the thing itself.
But pride should NEVER get in the way of raising your children. Children are far more important than a bruised ego, that's for sure.
The only shot I probably wouldn't get my kids is the chicken pox one. I'd rather them just get it and get it over with. It's rare that you get it twice, right? I had it once when I was 12 or younger, wasn't too bad. And I have yet to get it again =D
Some things should be left to the body, depending on family history and how the child reacts to things.
When I had the tummy flu as a kid, I dehydrated three years in a row and had to be in the hospital, so I probably should have had protection from that. But like I said, my chicken pox weren't bad so I wouldn't worry too much.
But, all in all, my belief is that it depends on the child's body. Allergies to some things should make shots a big 'no-no'. But if the child is healthy, a few vaccinations wouldn't hurt =D
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 12:31 am
I'm iffy on the chicken pox vaccination. On one hand, I do think children should experience it so they can't get it again in the future. However I know some things like shingles can come from the same virus, and like Bell's Palsy from the herpes/chicken pox virus (I think it's herpes, but can't remember for sure). Also just throwing this in here: http://abcnews.go.com/2020/print?id=2892683
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 01, 2007 4:19 pm
Nikolita I'm iffy on the chicken pox vaccination. On one hand, I do think children should experience it so they can't get it again in the future. However I know some things like shingles can come from the same virus, and like Bell's Palsy from the herpes/chicken pox virus (I think it's herpes, but can't remember for sure). Also just throwing this in here: ]http://abcnews.go.com/2020/print?id=2892683You know, when I found out Rowan needed to get the chicken pox vaccination, I thought about it for a bit. But... he's got it, because when you're little, you can DIE from it. If he were 10 and they wanted to give it to him, I'd say no... but he's not, he's 2. I vaccinate Rowan. What pisses me off it people who don't. We almost had polio eliminated until people started relying on the "herd mentality"... "If everyone else is vaccinated against it, we can't catch it anyway." All it takes is one foreign person to come over and have it to pass it to ALL those people who think it's not possible to get. Right now, this is what our scientists and chemists and doctors think is best for our children and our population as a whole. You just look at rates of illness and death since we started requiring them, and I think that's enough to make me do it. Some people argue that what if you find out later that it's harmful to your child? Well... then there's a gigantic, country-wide mass lawsuit, and we deal with it and get all the medical help we can. I'd much rather vaccinate him now and have him not get deadly ill, than worry it MIGHT be bad and have him die of something I could have easily prevented. After all, I'm not a doctor. So, when most of the lead people in this country tell me to vaccinate, who am I to say they're wrong?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 02, 2007 10:32 am
Savina Nikolita I'm iffy on the chicken pox vaccination. On one hand, I do think children should experience it so they can't get it again in the future. However I know some things like shingles can come from the same virus, and like Bell's Palsy from the herpes/chicken pox virus (I think it's herpes, but can't remember for sure). Also just throwing this in here: ]http://abcnews.go.com/2020/print?id=2892683You know, when I found out Rowan needed to get the chicken pox vaccination, I thought about it for a bit. But... he's got it, because when you're little, you can DIE from it. If he were 10 and they wanted to give it to him, I'd say no... but he's not, he's 2. I vaccinate Rowan. What pisses me off it people who don't. We almost had polio eliminated until people started relying on the "herd mentality"... "If everyone else is vaccinated against it, we can't catch it anyway." All it takes is one foreign person to come over and have it to pass it to ALL those people who think it's not possible to get. Right now, this is what our scientists and chemists and doctors think is best for our children and our population as a whole. You just look at rates of illness and death since we started requiring them, and I think that's enough to make me do it. Some people argue that what if you find out later that it's harmful to your child? Well... then there's a gigantic, country-wide mass lawsuit, and we deal with it and get all the medical help we can. I'd much rather vaccinate him now and have him not get deadly ill, than worry it MIGHT be bad and have him die of something I could have easily prevented. After all, I'm not a doctor. So, when most of the lead people in this country tell me to vaccinate, who am I to say they're wrong? I would never suggest a 2 year old experience the chicken pox, sorry. By "children", I meant kids who have sufficient immune systems and are usually a little older - like 10, as you suggested, somewhere around there. But not a toddler or young child.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 02, 2007 2:10 pm
Nikolita I would never suggest a 2 year old experience the chicken pox, sorry. By "children", I meant kids who have sufficient immune systems and are usually a little older - like 10, as you suggested, somewhere around there. But not a toddler or young child. How many times do I have to tell you to stop apologizing? biggrin
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2007 12:22 am
Savina Nikolita I would never suggest a 2 year old experience the chicken pox, sorry. By "children", I meant kids who have sufficient immune systems and are usually a little older - like 10, as you suggested, somewhere around there. But not a toddler or young child. How many times do I have to tell you to stop apologizing? biggrin Forever and ever. biggrin I just didn't want you to think I was intentionally trying to offend you or anything. I know you are the mother of a young child, and just wanted to clarify my post after you got specific with ages. ^^ Didn't want anyone else to get the wrong idea.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2007 10:01 pm
Nikolita Forever and ever. biggrin I just didn't want you to think I was intentionally trying to offend you or anything. I know you are the mother of a young child, and just wanted to clarify my post after you got specific with ages. ^^ Didn't want anyone else to get the wrong idea. The day you intentionally try to offend me is the day pigs grow wings, honey! biggrin I understood what you meant. smile Boils down to, essentially, when they're little (infant to about 5-6 or so), it's dangerous for them to get chicken pox. Potentially fatal. But... after that, I'm iffy on the vax because hell, everyone I know went through it juuuust fine. A few pock mark scars, but fine. However, I try not to live by that standard, but I don't neccessarily feel at that point that it falls into a category of diseases that I'm terrified of. The other vaccinations are for things that are almost always life threatening or disabling... after a point, chicken pox is just not that way.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|