|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fear My Bloody Fangs. Vice Captain
|
 Posted: Fri Jul 01, 2005 7:36 pm
I won't be posting much in here, the movies disapoint me. But I figured I should make a topic for you guys who like the movies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:28 pm
It was sad, they left out so much. The one that made me most confused was the prisoner of azkaban. I mean what was up with the huge clock? Alfanso shouldn't have had the students in regular clothing half the movie, and he could have atleast tried to make the landscaping similar to the movies before him.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:31 pm
Ugh, the clothes were horrible in the 3rd movie. Harry couldn't afford clothes like that, Hermione wouldn't have cared enough, and Ron can barely even dress 'Muggle'. It was yucky.
Then again, I have no love for any of the movies at all.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:33 pm
I agree, and what was Hermione doing with her hair up in Lupins class? Harry and Ron or anyone for that fact doesn't see her with her hair up untill the Yule Ball!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2005 3:33 pm
Although I do agree with your points, something to consider is the fact that each book covers a full year, and it is hard to get all of that into a two hour movie. To get everything in its entire detain you would be sitting through a 12 hour movie. Although I did not love the movies, I liked them and I think that the two directors (Chris Columbus, Alfonso) did a good job with what they had.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2005 3:40 pm
DarkAngel65 Although I do agree with your points, something to consider is the fact that each book covers a full year, and it is hard to get all of that into a two hour movie. To get everything in its entire detain you would be sitting through a 12 hour movie. Although I did not love the movies, I liked them and I think that the two directors (Chris Columbus, Alfonso) did a good job with what they had. Couldn't had said it better. heart
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2005 3:42 pm
DarkAngel65 Although I do agree with your points, something to consider is the fact that each book covers a full year, and it is hard to get all of that into a two hour movie. To get everything in its entire detain you would be sitting through a 12 hour movie. Although I did not love the movies, I liked them and I think that the two directors (Chris Columbus, Alfonso) did a good job with what they had.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2005 3:46 pm
KimCL DarkAngel65 Although I do agree with your points, something to consider is the fact that each book covers a full year, and it is hard to get all of that into a two hour movie. To get everything in its entire detain you would be sitting through a 12 hour movie. Although I did not love the movies, I liked them and I think that the two directors (Chris Columbus, Alfonso) did a good job with what they had. Yes, he did. I thought that the 4th one was also going to be directed by Alfonso?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2005 3:47 pm
DarkAngel65 KimCL DarkAngel65 Although I do agree with your points, something to consider is the fact that each book covers a full year, and it is hard to get all of that into a two hour movie. To get everything in its entire detain you would be sitting through a 12 hour movie. Although I did not love the movies, I liked them and I think that the two directors (Chris Columbus, Alfonso) did a good job with what they had. Yes, he did. I thought that the 4th one was also going to be directed by Alfonso?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2005 3:48 pm
chibi_chan DarkAngel65 Although I do agree with your points, something to consider is the fact that each book covers a full year, and it is hard to get all of that into a two hour movie. To get everything in its entire detain you would be sitting through a 12 hour movie. Although I did not love the movies, I liked them and I think that the two directors (Chris Columbus, Alfonso) did a good job with what they had. Couldn't had said it better. heart I'm glad that you agree. smile
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2005 3:48 pm
DarkAngel65 Although I do agree with your points, something to consider is the fact that each book covers a full year, and it is hard to get all of that into a two hour movie. To get everything in its entire detain you would be sitting through a 12 hour movie. Although I did not love the movies, I liked them and I think that the two directors (Chris Columbus, Alfonso) did a good job with what they had. No, I disagree. The Lord of the Rings movies were covering much larger books then HP, and they still managed to do a beautiful job. Although Columbus did do a better job then Alfonso, none of the movies really seemed to capture the spirit of the books, to me. I mean, when I read the books, I really believe, not so when watching those movies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2005 3:49 pm
KimCL DarkAngel65 KimCL DarkAngel65 Although I do agree with your points, something to consider is the fact that each book covers a full year, and it is hard to get all of that into a two hour movie. To get everything in its entire detain you would be sitting through a 12 hour movie. Although I did not love the movies, I liked them and I think that the two directors (Chris Columbus, Alfonso) did a good job with what they had. Yes, he did. I thought that the 4th one was also going to be directed by Alfonso? JKR didn't like the way Alfonso made the film to be?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2005 3:49 pm
Empress_Kat DarkAngel65 Although I do agree with your points, something to consider is the fact that each book covers a full year, and it is hard to get all of that into a two hour movie. To get everything in its entire detain you would be sitting through a 12 hour movie. Although I did not love the movies, I liked them and I think that the two directors (Chris Columbus, Alfonso) did a good job with what they had. No, I disagree. The Lord of the Rings movies were covering much larger books then HP, and they still managed to do a beautiful job. Although Columbus did do a better job then Alfonso, none of the movies really seemed to capture the spirit of the books, to me. I mean, when I read the books, I really believe, not so when watching those movies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2005 3:50 pm
The first two movies are better directed. But I still like the third better.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2005 3:51 pm
DarkAngel65 KimCL DarkAngel65 KimCL DarkAngel65 Although I do agree with your points, something to consider is the fact that each book covers a full year, and it is hard to get all of that into a two hour movie. To get everything in its entire detain you would be sitting through a 12 hour movie. Although I did not love the movies, I liked them and I think that the two directors (Chris Columbus, Alfonso) did a good job with what they had. Yes, he did. I thought that the 4th one was also going to be directed by Alfonso? JKR didn't like the way Alfonso made the film to be?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
