Welcome to Gaia! ::

Since the movie's been out, there seems to be a growing amount of Christian propaganda pointing out each and every inaccuracy in the movie and the book. I've read several of these books claiming to "break Da Vinci's Code" and have been repeatedly disappointed over how the authors make many attacks against the story but in no way give you evidence that any elements of the story may be true.

However, while Opus Dei humbly points out inaccuracies concerning their own organization, the Catholic Church in general remained silent.

By the way, from here on I will be assuming you've read the book or at least seen the movie, so if you haven't stop reading.

To understand the situation, you will need to understand one fact. The fact that fundamentalist Christians don't want revealed:

In mystic Christianity, Christ was said to be married to Mary Magdalen, and to have fathered a sacred lineage.

It should also be understood however that Christianity was never a goddess worshiping cult. There is not a dualistic God/Goddess godhead in Christianity.

If the marriage of Jesus can be proven through apocryphal scripture and other historical clues, why wouldn't the Church speak out more against Dan Brown and his writings?

Because at the end of the book, the Grail fanatic turns out to be the bad guy and the Church comes out on the good side. Dan Brown, while not agreeing with the teachings of the Church, has friends in the Vatican. Those of you who have read Angels & Demons know that throughout that book, Langdon is on the Church's side. Take a look at the acknowledgments at the end of that book, and you will see that Brown used inside information when doing his research. He even met with the pope privately.

The Church didn't speak out against the Da Vinci Code because they didn't have to. Enough hype has been driven into this story that the public is now likely to treat it as a passing fad. It can even be argued that some people have even become more faithful, asking their pastors if the allegations are indeed true.

True believers of the grail story will have to continue to be a small, nearly unheard of group.

(This article was my inspiration for this thread.)

Not only have I heard of Holy Blood, Holy Grail, but I also have a copy sitting on my shelf. That book, however, seems "stretched" in places... I find it very hard to believe that Christ was NOT crucified, as the authors assert. Even followers of the Gnostic traditions that do believe in a bloodline of Christ, find that book somewhat embellished. It contains interesting theories though.

That said, I'm afraid I don't quite follow what you're trying to say in your post... sweatdrop I do agree that Da Vinci has become over commercialized though.

what people dont seem to relize is that dan brown acctualy said time and time again that he never once claimed that any thing in either the da vinci code or angels and demons was real or factual.

yeah...he says that all the time in the interveiws he gets

There is such a thing as "historical fiction". Yes, some of the groups in the book like Opus Dei and the Illuminati and so forth do exist, however there is no reason to believe that the story is true.

Besides, back when the Gnostics were around, they were an incredibly small sect of mystics who took quite a number of liberties with already establish Christian theology, and were denounced as heretics many many times by the Catholic church. The reason, I suppose, the church isn't bothering to point out all of the flaws and inaccuracies in the book(s) is because they assume that people are smart enough to know the difference between fiction and history. Your first guess should be which section the book is in the bookstore....

And, Axeman, you would be surprised to find out just how many people do believe that The DaVinci Code is a history book.

Holy Blood, Holy Grail is a real book, but most scholars and Historians consider it "Pseudohistory," meaning a fictionalized account of real history. The book claims that Christ did NOT die on the cross, but that he and Mary Magdalene were married and had at least one child after escaping across the Mediterranean Sea and ending up in France. The child, a girl names Sarah, went on to be one of the founding members of the Merovingian bloodline, the earliest kings of France. The authors of the book further claim that after the Merovingian bloodline fell out of rulership of the country, a secret order was formed to protect the bloodline of Christ, called the Priory of Sion. They further claimed that they knew who some of the supposed modern day living descendants of Christ were.

There are few or no books outside of Holy Blood, Holy Grail that claim the Priory of Sion to be real. The majority of scholarly works disprove the Priory as being fiction. And there is well-documented evidence of Christ's crucifixion from non-Christian sources. Dan Brown borrowed heavily from this book, but the book from the very beginning was nothing more than a story written to gain money and attention.