|
|
| naniniwala ka ba sa speech ni GMA? |
| oo |
|
41% |
[ 5 ] |
| hindi..mukha kaseng scripted |
|
58% |
[ 7 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2005 4:04 am
siguro naman napanood niyong lahat yung speech ni GMA sa tv..kagabi..tungkol dun sa hello garci na isyu??...anong masasabi niyo...?mukha bang maktotohanan?...o scripted?...
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2005 4:13 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2005 4:26 am
Of course
At gusto niya pa na tumulong pa tayo sa kanya? Like, ang loyalty rating nalang sa kanya is .1% nalang!
I WILL NEVER HELP A THIEF!! THIEVES BELONG IN THE PRISON NOT IN THE PALACE!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2005 6:00 am
flashpoint Of course At gusto niya pa na tumulong pa tayo sa kanya? Like, ang loyalty rating nalang sa kanya is .1% nalang! I WILL NEVER HELP A THIEF!! THIEVES BELONG IN THE PRISON NOT IN THE PALACE!! I am proud to be the as you say .1% loyal. She was the best choice in the last election and should stay as the president.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2005 6:54 am
Katsumoto_Ryusaki89 flashpoint Of course At gusto niya pa na tumulong pa tayo sa kanya? Like, ang loyalty rating nalang sa kanya is .1% nalang! I WILL NEVER HELP A THIEF!! THIEVES BELONG IN THE PRISON NOT IN THE PALACE!! I am proud to be the as you say .1% loyal. She was the best choice in the last election and should stay as the president. best? Let us take a look at her track record. In 1994, promising more jobs and sustained economic growth, then Senator GMA placed the country under WTO rule. The result: rising unemployment, low wages and job loss for millions of workers due to company closures, privatization, and the devastation of the agriculture sector due to the influx of agricultural imports. The devastation continues up to now. In 2001, she promised to work on a platform of new politics and pro-poor economic program. But inreality, the same old trapo politics remained while her economic policies bent further towards foreign, as well as to corporate and landlord interests. It was also during that time when she forced the passage of EPIRA which ensured the speedy privatization of Napocor. In response to the widespread protests against the PPA, GMA reduced the power rates by almost P0.85/kwh. Only to take it back later by approving Napocor and Meralco rates increases.Ironically, under a woman presidency, women have assumed increased burden with privatization of basic public services. GMA has further defrauded the farmers by misspending the P38B Marcos wealth in misallocating the coco levy to agribusiness in cahoots with Danding Cojuanco. From 2001 up to now, the GMA administration has embarked on a borrowing spree, pushing the government deeply more into debt. And aside from these new borrowings, GMA has perpetuated the policy of prioritizing debt payments over social and economic services, allocating almost 95% of our total tax revenue to debt service. The result: Deteriorating social services; lack of budget for economic development; VAT and more taxes.
The Arroyo administration is also a consistent human rights violator. Moreover, it is also as brutal as the past administrations in the use of force against legitimate protests as shown in the case of Hacienda Luisita, the summary killings of activists, the continuous scapegoating and human rights violations on Muslims labelled as terrorists, and in maintaining the war policy in addressing the struggle for self-determination of the Moro people in Mindanao. Its gross inaction in solving the killings of media people is condemnable. Moreover, the GMA administration has adopted a shameful policy of denying full reproductive health services critical to womens health and lives. Clearly, the records speak for themselves. GMA and the rotten system she
perpetuates are more of a scourge to the people rather than a source of inspiration.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2005 10:26 am
I think she raised taxes so that she can suppress inflation. Also, she borrowed more money and allocated like majority of taxes to debt service in order to rid us of inflation faster. You can't ignore the fact that 2003's inflation rate of 8.8% went down to 2004's 5.3%. That is just my approach as an economist, but don't get your hopes up in what I just said.
I have limited knowledge about economics.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Talumpati at Sinta Vice Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2005 10:35 am
wasn't able to see it..or hear it..nasa paaralan siguro ako noon..saan po ba makakakuha ng kopya ng speech niya na iyon?! salamas po in advance.. domokun
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2005 11:32 am
wala na... kung patatalsikin si GMA, sino papalit? si Noli? o si Susan Roces? o si Erap uli?
kailangan nang ireporma ang constitution.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2005 12:22 pm
para syang robot na nagsasalita...
inamin na nya ung mali nya...di pa ba dapat lubusin na nya at umalis na sya sa palasyo?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2005 1:51 pm
eychbee wala na... kung patatalsikin si GMA, sino papalit? si Noli? o si Susan Roces? o si Erap uli? kailangan nang ireporma ang constitution. Tama ka nga, sino ngang papalit? Ako na lang kaya... Ano bang requirements para maging presidente? Hindi ko napanood yung speech nya. Sa Pilipinas lang ba brinoadcast? Aienne, nandito ka rin pala sa guild na ito! LOL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2005 6:25 pm
flashpoint Katsumoto_Ryusaki89 flashpoint Of course At gusto niya pa na tumulong pa tayo sa kanya? Like, ang loyalty rating nalang sa kanya is .1% nalang! I WILL NEVER HELP A THIEF!! THIEVES BELONG IN THE PRISON NOT IN THE PALACE!! I am proud to be the as you say .1% loyal. She was the best choice in the last election and should stay as the president. best? Let us take a look at her track record. In 1994, promising more jobs and sustained economic growth, then Senator GMA placed the country under WTO rule. The result: rising unemployment, low wages and job loss for millions of workers due to company closures, privatization, and the devastation of the agriculture sector due to the influx of agricultural imports. The devastation continues up to now. In 2001, she promised to work on a platform of new politics and pro-poor economic program. But inreality, the same old trapo politics remained while her economic policies bent further towards foreign, as well as to corporate and landlord interests. It was also during that time when she forced the passage of EPIRA which ensured the speedy privatization of Napocor. In response to the widespread protests against the PPA, GMA reduced the power rates by almost P0.85/kwh. Only to take it back later by approving Napocor and Meralco rates increases.Ironically, under a woman presidency, women have assumed increased burden with privatization of basic public services. GMA has further defrauded the farmers by misspending the P38B Marcos wealth in misallocating the coco levy to agribusiness in cahoots with Danding Cojuanco. From 2001 up to now, the GMA administration has embarked on a borrowing spree, pushing the government deeply more into debt. And aside from these new borrowings, GMA has perpetuated the policy of prioritizing debt payments over social and economic services, allocating almost 95% of our total tax revenue to debt service. The result: Deteriorating social services; lack of budget for economic development; VAT and more taxes.
The Arroyo administration is also a consistent human rights violator. Moreover, it is also as brutal as the past administrations in the use of force against legitimate protests as shown in the case of Hacienda Luisita, the summary killings of activists, the continuous scapegoating and human rights violations on Muslims labelled as terrorists, and in maintaining the war policy in addressing the struggle for self-determination of the Moro people in Mindanao. Its gross inaction in solving the killings of media people is condemnable. Moreover, the GMA administration has adopted a shameful policy of denying full reproductive health services critical to womens health and lives. Clearly, the records speak for themselves. GMA and the rotten system she
perpetuates are more of a scourge to the people rather than a source of inspiration.Right then... Let us review the last candidates for presidents shall we? 1.FPJ 90% of class E citizen support 2.Ping didn't have a chance fo winning 3.GMA had the best chance against FPJ 4.Bro Eddie didn't have a chance 5.Roco didn't have a chance Also, all those programs could have worked if we just had supported her instead of whining and whining. Nothing would ever work if we just sit there and whine all the time. Nobody is perfect. you cannot have a perfect leader. I am only asking for a good one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2005 10:33 pm
Katsumoto_Ryusaki89 flashpoint Katsumoto_Ryusaki89 flashpoint Of course At gusto niya pa na tumulong pa tayo sa kanya? Like, ang loyalty rating nalang sa kanya is .1% nalang! I WILL NEVER HELP A THIEF!! THIEVES BELONG IN THE PRISON NOT IN THE PALACE!! I am proud to be the as you say .1% loyal. She was the best choice in the last election and should stay as the president. best? Let us take a look at her track record. In 1994, promising more jobs and sustained economic growth, then Senator GMA placed the country under WTO rule. The result: rising unemployment, low wages and job loss for millions of workers due to company closures, privatization, and the devastation of the agriculture sector due to the influx of agricultural imports. The devastation continues up to now. In 2001, she promised to work on a platform of new politics and pro-poor economic program. But inreality, the same old trapo politics remained while her economic policies bent further towards foreign, as well as to corporate and landlord interests. It was also during that time when she forced the passage of EPIRA which ensured the speedy privatization of Napocor. In response to the widespread protests against the PPA, GMA reduced the power rates by almost P0.85/kwh. Only to take it back later by approving Napocor and Meralco rates increases.Ironically, under a woman presidency, women have assumed increased burden with privatization of basic public services. GMA has further defrauded the farmers by misspending the P38B Marcos wealth in misallocating the coco levy to agribusiness in cahoots with Danding Cojuanco. From 2001 up to now, the GMA administration has embarked on a borrowing spree, pushing the government deeply more into debt. And aside from these new borrowings, GMA has perpetuated the policy of prioritizing debt payments over social and economic services, allocating almost 95% of our total tax revenue to debt service. The result: Deteriorating social services; lack of budget for economic development; VAT and more taxes.
The Arroyo administration is also a consistent human rights violator. Moreover, it is also as brutal as the past administrations in the use of force against legitimate protests as shown in the case of Hacienda Luisita, the summary killings of activists, the continuous scapegoating and human rights violations on Muslims labelled as terrorists, and in maintaining the war policy in addressing the struggle for self-determination of the Moro people in Mindanao. Its gross inaction in solving the killings of media people is condemnable. Moreover, the GMA administration has adopted a shameful policy of denying full reproductive health services critical to womens health and lives. Clearly, the records speak for themselves. GMA and the rotten system she
perpetuates are more of a scourge to the people rather than a source of inspiration.Right then... Let us review the last candidates for presidents shall we? 1.FPJ 90% of class E citizen support 2.Ping didn't have a chance fo winning 3.GMA had the best chance against FPJ 4.Bro Eddie didn't have a chance 5.Roco didn't have a chance Also, all those programs could have worked if we just had supported her instead of whining and whining. Nothing would ever work if we just sit there and whine all the time. Nobody is perfect. you cannot have a perfect leader. I am only asking for a good one. psst... sama mo naman sa listahan si eddie gil...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2005 4:33 am
FPJ wasn't perfect either... but can you prove that he was a bad president?
Sayang, pwede sana.... kaya lang patay na siya eh. sobrang na stress kasi sa eleksyon tapos ngayon dinaya pa siya ni GMA.
haaaaaay buhay, gagawin ko na nga assignment ko, bata pa ako pasan ko na problema ng bansa. uwi na ako
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2005 5:19 am
go katsu! you're my spokesperson!! 3nodding
right behind you, man! heart
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2005 6:33 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
