|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 15, 2007 10:02 am
here is how you would play:
ie. English would be better if it had musical tones (like Norwegian or Swedish)
be sure to use these words: Prettier, More Beautiful, Worse, Absolutely awful, better, more difficult etc....
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 15, 2007 12:28 pm
Irish would be better if it wasn't taught as crappily as it is.
English would be better if it sounded more gutteral, like Irish and German.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eccentric Iconoclast Vice Captain
|
Posted: Mon Jan 15, 2007 6:10 pm
French would be prettier if it sounded more clear and less smushed.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 15, 2007 6:53 pm
English would sound prettier if it weren't spoken in every friggin continent! (If you hear it so much, it's just not that great anymore)
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 15, 2007 10:03 pm
English would be more difficult if the rules were more general. xp
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 16, 2007 6:14 am
English would be more difficult if it used cases but still kept all of it's original grammar as well
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 16, 2007 2:08 pm
Hindi would be better if somebody taught it on this freaking continent! But no..
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 16, 2007 2:13 pm
Swedish would be more difficult if it had russian grammar rules added to it.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 17, 2007 2:03 am
German would be less difficult if it simplified its case system.
Dutch would be more difficult if it even had a case system.
English would be weirder if it suddenly gained gender articles.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 17, 2007 9:23 am
English would be cooler if it were written in characters. biggrin ( IN FACT... )
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 17, 2007 5:58 pm
English would be more confusing and incomprehensible than ever if it were written in characters. xp
Asian languages would be cooler if they were alphabetized.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 18, 2007 6:17 am
Italian would be better with 2 musical tones French would be more difficult with 14 cases, and if the spelling system changed
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 18, 2007 11:12 am
Kokoroki Italian would be better with 2 musical tones what do you mean? Italian would be better (for non-native speakers, but sadly per un sacco di italiani sgrammaticati, to learn) if it didn't have the subjonctif = congiuntivo
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 18, 2007 11:48 am
Firewolfblue Kokoroki Italian would be better with 2 musical tones what do you mean? Italian would be better (for non-native speakers, but sadly per un sacco di italiani sgrammaticati, to learn) if it didn't have the subjonctif = congiuntivoacute and grave tones used in Norwegian and Swedish french would be better with a trilled "r" and not a throaty one
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 23, 2007 3:53 pm
French would be oodles easier if it was spelled the way it sounds.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|