Welcome to Gaia! ::

Unashamed - A Christian Discussion Guild

Back to Guilds

 

Tags: Christian, Discussion, Religion, Theology, Philosophy 

Reply Thread Archive {Hot topics}
Absolutism: The perfect system? Goto Page: 1 2 [>] [»|]

Quick Reply

Enter both words below, separated by a space:

Can't read the text? Click here

Submit

OOOoooh!
Spooky language!
100%
 100%  [ 9 ]
Total Votes : 9


Lethkhar

PostPosted: Thu Jan 11, 2007 11:15 pm


Merriam-Webster's Dictionary
Main Entry: ab·so·lut·ism
Pronunciation: 'ab-s&-"lü-"ti-z&m
Function: noun
1 a : a political theory that absolute power should be vested in one or more rulers b : government by an absolute ruler or authority : DESPOTISM


Absolutism is a political theory that involves giving absolute and complete power to (usually) one supreme ruler. It is a very efficient system when implemented correctly (As was the case with King Louis XIV), but it is only as good as its ruler. Because of this, it can also wreak disaster (As was the case with King Louis XV) on the society.

As you can probably conject, the universe we live in by Christian beliefs is an absolutist society. Supreme power is given to God. God controls it all.

Now, God is said to be perfect. This means that the system He rules is perfect.

Essentially, I wanted to compare God to a monarch such as King Louis XIV of France.


Another point I'd like to bring up is the morality of various political systems. Do Christians believe that democracy is an ineffective system? Should we have dictators rather than democratically elected representatives? Why is it the Kingdom of Heaven and not the Republic of Heaven? Does God act as Executive, Legislative, and Judicial branches all in one?

God's system is equivalent to that of Adolf Hitler's. If you did not see the Third Reich as an effective system, then you were executed. By the same token, if you do not believe in the Christian system, you are burned for eternity.

What do you people think?
PostPosted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 11:06 pm


Lethkhar
As you can probably conject, the universe we live in by Christian beliefs is an absolutist society. Supreme power is given to God. God controls it all.

Supreme power is not given to G-d. This would imply that supreme power could be taken away from G-d. The two are hand-in-hand.

Quote:
Now, God is said to be perfect. This means that the system He rules is perfect.

Essentially, I wanted to compare God to a monarch such as King Louis XIV of France.

Okay. G-d's system would be better. Like you said, it's as good as it's ruler, and G-d is perfect.


Quote:
Another point I'd like to bring up is the morality of various political systems. Do Christians believe that democracy is an ineffective system? Should we have dictators rather than democratically elected representatives? Why is it the Kingdom of Heaven and not the Republic of Heaven? Does God act as Executive, Legislative, and Judicial branches all in one?

Systems of governments aren't really talked about in the Bible (at least, the New Testament). I believe that any system is perfectly fine by G-d, so long as it upholds it's people's rights and living conditions, and does not engage in/support sinful acts/

Quote:
God's system is equivalent to that of Adolf Hitler's. If you did not see the Third Reich as an effective system, then you were executed. By the same token, if you do not believe in the Christian system, you are burned for eternity.

No, there is a large difference. G-d doesn't care if you see His system as efficient or not. G-d cares about whether or not you are blameless in the eyes of His system, and, if you are not, whether or not you ask to be forgiven for whatever caused you to not be blameless.

In the Third Reich (which, I might add, was an effective system of government no matter how you look at it), you were just executed.

ioioouiouiouio


Lethkhar

PostPosted: Sat Jan 13, 2007 1:00 am


Cometh The Inquisitor
Quote:
God's system is equivalent to that of Adolf Hitler's. If you did not see the Third Reich as an effective system, then you were executed. By the same token, if you do not believe in the Christian system, you are burned for eternity.

No, there is a large difference. G-d doesn't care if you see His system as efficient or not. G-d cares about whether or not you are blameless in the eyes of His system

It's funny, because that's actually exactly how Nazi Germany worked. If you were blameless in the eyes of the Nazi party, you were fine. If not, you died.

Quote:
, and, if you are not, whether or not you ask to be forgiven for whatever caused you to not be blameless.

Now here's where Nazi Germany seemed to ahve a slightly more just system. See, they told you exactly what to do and what not to do in a specific set of laws. God gave us an old book which most people disagree on which parts to take seriously.

In the Third Reich, you knew to take it all seriously.

If you take all of God's rules seriously, you're not going to have a very pleasant life, and you'll probably break quite a few without even realising it.

Quote:
In the Third Reich (which, I might add, was an effective system of government no matter how you look at it), you were just executed.

Well, you got a trial first.

I mean, they basically had the judge yell at you for five minutes before sending you off to be executed...

And yes, it was an effective system that lifted Germany out of economic turmoil and turned them into a prominant, leading nation that was a threat to the world. Just like France and King Louis XIV.

It just stopped being so effective when the Fuhrer went insane and thought he had five times the forces he actually had...
PostPosted: Sat Jan 13, 2007 9:03 pm


Lethkhar

It's funny, because that's actually exactly how Nazi Germany worked. If you were blameless in the eyes of the Nazi party, you were fine. If not, you died.

Well then it, again, goes back to G-d = perfect and humans =/= perfect.

Quote:
Now here's where Nazi Germany seemed to ahve a slightly more just system. See, they told you exactly what to do and what not to do in a specific set of laws. God gave us an old book which most people disagree on which parts to take seriously.

In the Third Reich, you knew to take it all seriously.

If you take all of God's rules seriously, you're not going to have a very pleasant life, and you'll probably break quite a few without even realizing it.

You missed the point of my post. in G-d's system, no matter what rules you break (save for one, which we know exactly what it is), you can and will be forgiven if you ask sincerely.

Quote:
Well, you got a trial first.

I mean, they basically had the judge yell at you for five minutes before sending you off to be executed...

And you get a trial in G-d's system. So we're still G-d > Nazis.

Quote:
And yes, it was an effective system that lifted Germany out of economic turmoil and turned them into a prominant, leading nation that was a threat to the world. Just like France and King Louis XIV.

Eh, France wasn't that bad off before King Louis, and it never threatened the world as well. It just sorta Enlightened.

Quote:
It just stopped being so effective when the Fuhrer went insane and thought he had five times the forces he actually had...

Eh, if he'dve taken out Russia first, then he would've gotten away with it and won the world war.

ioioouiouiouio


Lethkhar

PostPosted: Sat Jan 13, 2007 11:59 pm


Cometh The Inquisitor
Lethkhar

It's funny, because that's actually exactly how Nazi Germany worked. If you were blameless in the eyes of the Nazi party, you were fine. If not, you died.

Well then it, again, goes back to G-d = perfect and humans =/= perfect.

How so?

Quote:
Quote:
Now here's where Nazi Germany seemed to have a slightly more just system. See, they told you exactly what to do and what not to do in a specific set of laws. God gave us an old book which most people disagree on which parts to take seriously.

In the Third Reich, you knew to take it all seriously.

If you take all of God's rules seriously, you're not going to have a very pleasant life, and you'll probably break quite a few without even realizing it.

You missed the point of my post. in G-d's system, no matter what rules you break (save for one, which we know exactly what it is), you can and will be forgiven if you ask sincerely.

But only if you ask for forgiveness before you actually knew you comitted a crime.

Quote:
Quote:
Well, you got a trial first.

I mean, they basically had the judge yell at you for five minutes before sending you off to be executed...

And you get a trial in G-d's system. So we're still G-d > Nazis.

Not really. It sounds like pretty much the same kind of trial as the Nazis'.

Quote:
Quote:
And yes, it was an effective system that lifted Germany out of economic turmoil and turned them into a prominant, leading nation that was a threat to the world. Just like France and King Louis XIV.

Eh, France wasn't that bad off before King Louis, and it never threatened the world as well. It just sorta Enlightened.

Are you kidding? If it weren't for the British and Holy Roman Empires allying in order to resist him, plus a series of plagues that swept through France, we'd probably all be speaking French right now.

Quote:
Quote:
It just stopped being so effective when the Fuhrer went insane and thought he had five times the forces he actually had...

Eh, if he'dve taken out Russia first, then he would've gotten away with it and won the world war.

He bit off more than he could chew...
PostPosted: Sun Jan 14, 2007 10:15 pm


Lethkhar

How so?

Perfection entails never being wrong. Therefore, if you were not blameless in the eyes of G-d, then you were not blameless.

Quote:

But only if you ask for forgiveness before you actually knew you committed a crime.

No, you can ask for forgiveness after you've done the crime. Just before you die.

Quote:

Not really. It sounds like pretty much the same kind of trial as the Nazis'.

Except an infallible one.

Quote:
Are you kidding? If it weren't for the British and Holy Roman Empires allying in order to resist him, plus a series of plagues that swept through France, we'd probably all be speaking French right now.

Eh, Louis was a threat to the other European nations, not Europe. Heck, life'd probably been better for most people had Louis won the war.

Quote:
He bit off more than he could chew...

Definitely.

ioioouiouiouio


freelance lover
Crew

PostPosted: Mon Jan 15, 2007 10:34 am


Ohhh, this is a good question... let's see...

Quote:
Absolutism is a political theory that involves giving absolute and complete power to (usually) one supreme ruler. It is a very efficient system when implemented correctly (As was the case with King Louis XIV), but it is only as good as its ruler. Because of this, it can also wreak disaster (As was the case with King Louis XV) on the society.

As you can probably conject, the universe we live in by Christian beliefs is an absolutist society. Supreme power is given to God. God controls it all.

Now, God is said to be perfect. This means that the system He rules is perfect.

Essentially, I wanted to compare God to a monarch such as King Louis XIV of France.


Under this assumption, God's society would be perfect, and by that I mean heaven is perfect. We can't really apply that to earth since there are other forces at work in the world besides God.


Quote:
Another point I'd like to bring up is the morality of various political systems. Do Christians believe that democracy is an ineffective system? Should we have dictators rather than democratically elected representatives? Why is it the Kingdom of Heaven and not the Republic of Heaven? Does God act as Executive, Legislative, and Judicial branches all in one?


This question kind of made me laugh... I believe democracy is a good system, but I don't believe in a perfect political system. As you said, most systems are only as good as their rulers, and that applies to democracy too. I suppose it would be Kingdom of Heaven for several reasons. The most obvious would be that in the society that the Bible was written in, they didn't have a republic, and they may not have even known what one was. I suppose during the NT they had some Roman background which would have led to some exposure, but by the time Christianity was a full fledged religion we were back to a emporer again.

You can't compare God's society to a form of government you don't know anything about, and they were most farmiliar with kingdoms. I also do suppose God would be the supreme ruler, which would make it more like a kingdom than a republic.

Quote:
God's system is equivalent to that of Adolf Hitler's. If you did not see the Third Reich as an effective system, then you were executed. By the same token, if you do not believe in the Christian system, you are burned for eternity.


This is an interesting point to make. However, I would say there's a bit less brutality in God's method than Hitler's. Hitler would excecute certain groups such as Jews, gypsys, and the handicapped regardless of if they believed in his system or not. The difference is that God is completely good and Hitler was well... not.
PostPosted: Mon Jan 15, 2007 12:08 pm


thelovelyLIZ
Ohhh, this is a good question... let's see...

Quote:
Absolutism is a political theory that involves giving absolute and complete power to (usually) one supreme ruler. It is a very efficient system when implemented correctly (As was the case with King Louis XIV), but it is only as good as its ruler. Because of this, it can also wreak disaster (As was the case with King Louis XV) on the society.

As you can probably conject, the universe we live in by Christian beliefs is an absolutist society. Supreme power is given to God. God controls it all.

Now, God is said to be perfect. This means that the system He rules is perfect.

Essentially, I wanted to compare God to a monarch such as King Louis XIV of France.


Under this assumption, God's society would be perfect, and by that I mean heaven is perfect. We can't really apply that to earth since there are other forces at work in the world besides God.

But God is omnipotent. Those other forces should be insignificant.


Quote:
Quote:
Another point I'd like to bring up is the morality of various political systems. Do Christians believe that democracy is an ineffective system? Should we have dictators rather than democratically elected representatives? Why is it the Kingdom of Heaven and not the Republic of Heaven? Does God act as Executive, Legislative, and Judicial branches all in one?


This question kind of made me laugh... I believe democracy is a good system, but I don't believe in a perfect political system. As you said, most systems are only as good as their rulers, and that applies to democracy too. I suppose it would be Kingdom of Heaven for several reasons. The most obvious would be that in the society that the Bible was written in, they didn't have a republic, and they may not have even known what one was. I suppose during the NT they had some Roman background which would have led to some exposure, but by the time Christianity was a full fledged religion we were back to a emporer again.

You can't compare God's society to a form of government you don't know anything about, and they were most farmiliar with kingdoms. I also do suppose God would be the supreme ruler, which would make it more like a kingdom than a republic.

So you blame the organization of the universe on human error? lol

This reminds me of the time that Fushigi blamed God for bad traffic...

Quote:
Quote:
God's system is equivalent to that of Adolf Hitler's. If you did not see the Third Reich as an effective system, then you were executed. By the same token, if you do not believe in the Christian system, you are burned for eternity.


This is an interesting point to make. However, I would say there's a bit less brutality in God's method than Hitler's. Hitler would excecute certain groups such as Jews, gypsys, and the handicapped regardless of if they believed in his system or not. The difference is that God is completely good and Hitler was well... not.

rofl

Actually, God "executes" certain groups as well. You know: Jews, atheists, Hindus, Muslims, Wiccans, Taoists, Confucianists, Baha'is, Voodoos...

Basically anyone who isn't Christian. In fact, the majority. Hitler at least targetted minorities.

Lethkhar


freelance lover
Crew

PostPosted: Tue Jan 16, 2007 4:23 pm


Quote:
But God is omnipotent. Those other forces should be insignificant.

In theory, but by some method that I don't pretend to understand, they're still at work. Also free will plays into it as well, since we choose to sin.


Quote:
So you blame the organization of the universe on human error? lol

This reminds me of the time that Fushigi blamed God for bad traffic...

I don't really understand how you got that from my argument. In case you can't tell, I usually have something to say but I don't know how to word it... I think the point was I don't believe in a perfect form of government because humans are flawed, but Heaven was compared to a kingdom because it's essentially all the authors of the Bible knew at the time.


Quote:
Actually, God "executes" certain groups as well. You know: Jews, atheists, Hindus, Muslims, Wiccans, Taoists, Confucianists, Baha'is, Voodoos...

Basically anyone who isn't Christian. In fact, the majority. Hitler at least targetted minorities.

But it's not like he executes them without warning. He's given us the tools and means to follow him like he wants, we just have to choose to follow him. Hitler just started killing people.
PostPosted: Tue Jan 16, 2007 5:27 pm


thelovelyLIZ
Quote:
But God is omnipotent. Those other forces should be insignificant.

In theory, but by some method that I don't pretend to understand, they're still at work. Also free will plays into it as well, since we choose to sin.

Oh, the "big black box" argument. *applauds*

This is one of my favorites! lol It's hilarious!

Anyways, I guess we should get back to the discussion. Good one, though. wink

Quote:
Quote:
So you blame the organization of the universe on human error? lol

This reminds me of the time that Fushigi blamed God for bad traffic...

I don't really understand how you got that from my argument. In case you can't tell, I usually have something to say but I don't know how to word it... I think the point was I don't believe in a perfect form of government because humans are flawed, but Heaven was compared to a kingdom because it's essentially all the authors of the Bible knew at the time.

See, that's my point.

God's system of government is only as good as humanity's at the time the Bible was written. Doesn't that say something to you?

God is only as complex and intelligent as His creators were. We created God in our own image and likeness.

Quote:
Quote:
Actually, God "executes" certain groups as well. You know: Jews, atheists, Hindus, Muslims, Wiccans, Taoists, Confucianists, Baha'is, Voodoos...

Basically anyone who isn't Christian. In fact, the majority. Hitler at least targetted minorities.

But it's not like he executes them without warning. He's given us the tools and means to follow him like he wants, we just have to choose to follow him. Hitler just started killing people.

Do you honestly think he gives everyone a chance? We're predestined to Hell and Heaven.

If I grew up in a Hindu household, I doubt I would convert to Christianity. Even if I had heard of Christ, (trust me on this) Hinduism makes a lot more sense. Why would I convert?

At least the Jews had a chance to escape...

Lethkhar


freelance lover
Crew

PostPosted: Tue Jan 16, 2007 7:28 pm


Lethkhar
thelovelyLIZ
Quote:
But God is omnipotent. Those other forces should be insignificant.

In theory, but by some method that I don't pretend to understand, they're still at work. Also free will plays into it as well, since we choose to sin.

Oh, the "big black box" argument. *applauds*

This is one of my favorites! lol It's hilarious!

Anyways, I guess we should get back to the discussion. Good one, though. wink

Quote:
Quote:
So you blame the organization of the universe on human error? lol

This reminds me of the time that Fushigi blamed God for bad traffic...

I don't really understand how you got that from my argument. In case you can't tell, I usually have something to say but I don't know how to word it... I think the point was I don't believe in a perfect form of government because humans are flawed, but Heaven was compared to a kingdom because it's essentially all the authors of the Bible knew at the time.

See, that's my point.

God's system of government is only as good as humanity's at the time the Bible was written. Doesn't that say something to you?

God is only as complex and intelligent as His creators were. We created God in our own image and likeness.

Quote:
Quote:
Actually, God "executes" certain groups as well. You know: Jews, atheists, Hindus, Muslims, Wiccans, Taoists, Confucianists, Baha'is, Voodoos...

Basically anyone who isn't Christian. In fact, the majority. Hitler at least targetted minorities.

But it's not like he executes them without warning. He's given us the tools and means to follow him like he wants, we just have to choose to follow him. Hitler just started killing people.

Do you honestly think he gives everyone a chance? We're predestined to Hell and Heaven.

If I grew up in a Hindu household, I doubt I would convert to Christianity. Even if I had heard of Christ, (trust me on this) Hinduism makes a lot more sense. Why would I convert?

At least the Jews had a chance to escape...


First part: Naive question: what is the big black box argument? It's a term I'm not farmiliar with.

Second part: God is inconcievable to humans He is everywhere and everything and humans cannot wrap their minds around the vastness of God. He's often pictured looking like a man, but I think that's ridiculous. Like putting God in a box, if you will. But since we can't completely understand it, we relate it to the best things we know how. In reality no one really knows what Heaven is like, some guy just assumed it would be like a perfect kingdom where God is the ruler. God is equated with a king since he rules over everything, like the ruler of a country.

Random thought: would God really even need to "rule" Heaven? If it's a perfect system then there's no need to have a judicual system... because no one will do anything wrong. Everyone would just know how God calls us to "live" and do that in Heaven I guess. So actually anarchy seems the most probable of all methods of government, that or the absolutism that this thread is based off of.

Something to ponder I guess

Third thing: Okay, see I don't believe in predestination so that kind of declares your argument null and void. I personally find it a ridiculous argument and it just doesn't even make sense to me. It's like God's setting you up for failure, and he defiently does not want you to suck at life.

BUT I do acknowledge someone born in a society highly dominated by another religion may ir may not be screwed. I know people who have converted to and from Christianity, so it happens quite a bit. There's actually a very nice Indian woman at my church who I believe was formerly Hindu. Your comment about Hindu making more sense is an opinion so again, null and void. I've studied Hinduism and I think it's a great religion, but that's not the point. Also multiple paths comes into this subject but... whatev.

I think that's it for now.
PostPosted: Tue Jan 16, 2007 7:53 pm


thelovelyLIZ
Lethkhar
thelovelyLIZ
Quote:
But God is omnipotent. Those other forces should be insignificant.

In theory, but by some method that I don't pretend to understand, they're still at work. Also free will plays into it as well, since we choose to sin.

Oh, the "big black box" argument. *applauds*

This is one of my favorites! lol It's hilarious!

Anyways, I guess we should get back to the discussion. Good one, though. wink

Quote:
Quote:
So you blame the organization of the universe on human error? lol

This reminds me of the time that Fushigi blamed God for bad traffic...

I don't really understand how you got that from my argument. In case you can't tell, I usually have something to say but I don't know how to word it... I think the point was I don't believe in a perfect form of government because humans are flawed, but Heaven was compared to a kingdom because it's essentially all the authors of the Bible knew at the time.

See, that's my point.

God's system of government is only as good as humanity's at the time the Bible was written. Doesn't that say something to you?

God is only as complex and intelligent as His creators were. We created God in our own image and likeness.

Quote:
Quote:
Actually, God "executes" certain groups as well. You know: Jews, atheists, Hindus, Muslims, Wiccans, Taoists, Confucianists, Baha'is, Voodoos...

Basically anyone who isn't Christian. In fact, the majority. Hitler at least targetted minorities.

But it's not like he executes them without warning. He's given us the tools and means to follow him like he wants, we just have to choose to follow him. Hitler just started killing people.

Do you honestly think he gives everyone a chance? We're predestined to Hell and Heaven.

If I grew up in a Hindu household, I doubt I would convert to Christianity. Even if I had heard of Christ, (trust me on this) Hinduism makes a lot more sense. Why would I convert?

At least the Jews had a chance to escape...


First part: Naive question: what is the big black box argument? It's a term I'm not farmiliar with.

"God is inconcievable. Therefore, He exists."

Quote:
Second part: God is inconcievable to humans He is everywhere and everything and humans cannot wrap their minds around the vastness of God. He's often pictured looking like a man, but I think that's ridiculous. Like putting God in a box, if you will. But since we can't completely understand it, we relate it to the best things we know how. In reality no one really knows what Heaven is like, some guy just assumed it would be like a perfect kingdom where God is the ruler. God is equated with a king since he rules over everything, like the ruler of a country.

So God didn't actually speak to any of these people?

Quote:
Random thought: would God really even need to "rule" Heaven? If it's a perfect system then there's no need to have a judicual system... because no one will do anything wrong. Everyone would just know how God calls us to "live" and do that in Heaven I guess. So actually anarchy seems the most probable of all methods of government, that or the absolutism that this thread is based off of.

Something to ponder I guess

But then there wouldn't be a Hell... confused

Quote:
Third thing: Okay, see I don't believe in predestination so that kind of declares your argument null and void. I personally find it a ridiculous argument and it just doesn't even make sense to me. It's like God's setting you up for failure, and he defiently does not want you to suck at life.

Christians believe in predestination. It's sort of part of the contract.

Quote:
BUT I do acknowledge someone born in a society highly dominated by another religion may ir may not be screwed. I know people who have converted to and from Christianity, so it happens quite a bit. There's actually a very nice Indian woman at my church who I believe was formerly Hindu. Your comment about Hindu making more sense is an opinion so again, null and void. I've studied Hinduism and I think it's a great religion, but that's not the point. Also multiple paths comes into this subject but... whatev.

I think that's it for now.

Ok, so you understand and refuse to concede. "Whatev."

Lethkhar


freelance lover
Crew

PostPosted: Wed Jan 17, 2007 12:05 pm


Quote:
"God is inconcievable. Therefore, He exists."


A) You didn't answer my question. B) That's not what I said. I said that we can't understand him completely, so we compare him to what we know best.

Quote:
So God didn't actually speak to any of these people?


What people?

Quote:
But then there wouldn't be a Hell...


Admittedly, I didn't think that whole thing through. It was just me kinda pondering. I meant in Heaven though. What I was trying to say was if Heaven is perfect and everyone knows and follows the "laws" (for lack of a better word) then does it really need a ruler? So in theory doesn'y anarchy make the most sense? It was just a random thought.

Quote:
Christians believe in predestination. It's sort of part of the contract.


On the contrary, I don't. There's a passage from Moby d**k that explains very nicely the way I feel about all that, but I'm too lazy to summarize the whole thing right now. It's basically a combination of fate, free will, and chance. I think God will always know the outcome of our choices, but we have the ability to make our own choices. It's kinda like a giant web; you start from one part and it spilts off between the varying choices you can make. God knows the outcome to all of them, but we make the choice ourselves.

Quote:
Ok, so you understand and refuse to concede. "Whatev."


First of all, do not mock my laziness to type the last two letters xd Bad habit I picked up from a friend. Second, I do realize what your saying and that's where multiple paths comes into play, where I'm kinda on the fence with what I believe on that subject. As I said, they may or may not be screwed. They still have the means and the tools to convert, so it's not like they weren't given an opportunity, but I do acknowledge your point. I don't pretend to know all of God's inner workings, so I can't give you a definite answer.
PostPosted: Wed Jan 17, 2007 3:28 pm


thelovelyLIZ
Quote:
"God is inconcievable. Therefore, He exists."


A) You didn't answer my question. B) That's not what I said. I said that we can't understand him completely, so we compare him to what we know best.

A) Yes I did. That essentially is the black box argument. The idea that God is so complex and inconcievable that He must exist.

It's more of an argument against evolution, but you seem to have implemented it in a completely unrelated manner. Again, I applaud you.

B) But it wasn't people comparing God to something, it was God comparing Himself to something. Surely He has a greater imagination than that? I mean, I was writing with metaphors like those in the Bible when I was in seventh grade...

Quote:
Quote:
So God didn't actually speak to any of these people?


What people?

The people who wrote the Bible. stare

Where did they get these ideas of kingdoms? God gave it to them, right? The creativity of God's "kingdom" was just the only conievable form of societal structure back then. Before the Enlightenment and such. What a coincidence that God should be in complete agreement with how society was structured at the time the Bible was written... rolleyes

"You can safely say that you created God in your own likeness when He agrees with everything you believe."

Quote:
Quote:
But then there wouldn't be a Hell...


Admittedly, I didn't think that whole thing through. It was just me kinda pondering. I meant in Heaven though. What I was trying to say was if Heaven is perfect and everyone knows and follows the "laws" (for lack of a better word) then does it really need a ruler? So in theory doesn'y anarchy make the most sense? It was just a random thought.

Who's to say that everyone will follow the rules? They're already in Heaven, so there's really no incentive for them to do so.

Speculation...

Quote:
Quote:
Christians believe in predestination. It's sort of part of the contract.


On the contrary, I don't. There's a passage from Moby d**k that explains very nicely the way I feel about all that, but I'm too lazy to summarize the whole thing right now. It's basically a combination of fate, free will, and chance. I think God will always know the outcome of our choices, but we have the ability to make our own choices. It's kinda like a giant web; you start from one part and it spilts off between the varying choices you can make. God knows the outcome to all of them, but we make the choice ourselves.

But don't our own decisions impose upon the free will of others?

There's also a passage from The Holy Bible that explains very nicely how you, as a Christian, are supposed to feel about that:

Romans 8:28-30
And we know that all things work together for good to them that love God, to them who are the called according to his purpose.
[29] For whom he did foreknow, he also did predestinate to be conformed to the image of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brethren.
[30] Moreover whom he did predestinate, them he also called: and whom he called, them he also justified: and whom he justified, them he also glorified.


God also predestined Jeremiah's purpose in life:
Jeremiah 1:5
Before I formed thee in the belly I knew thee; and before thou camest forth out of the womb I sanctified thee, and I ordained thee a prophet unto the nations.


Quote:
Quote:
Ok, so you understand and refuse to concede. "Whatev."


First of all, do not mock my laziness to type the last two letters xd Bad habit I picked up from a friend. Second, I do realize what your saying and that's where multiple paths comes into play, where I'm kinda on the fence with what I believe on that subject. As I said, they may or may not be screwed. They still have the means and the tools to convert, so it's not like they weren't given an opportunity, but I do acknowledge your point. I don't pretend to know all of God's inner workings, so I can't give you a definite answer.

A chance, maybe. But some people have a lot better of a chance than others. (I smell injustice...)

The bottom line is that the very nature of the Abrahamic God is fundamentally fallable.

Lethkhar


freelance lover
Crew

PostPosted: Wed Jan 17, 2007 4:13 pm


Okay, in case you can't tell, you usually have to be a little more thorough with me xD Especially today, since I didn't have school.

I still don't really understand how I'm applying the black box arguement to it. I don't recall saying that since God is inconcievable he exists. I believe we can't understand him, but that's not why I believe in him.

God didn't write the Bible. It's based off people's expereinces, visions, etc. so in a lot of it God didn't really do the talking. When he did, prehaps he was just describing it in a way he thought we'd understand. You know, like how you talk to children who may not understand something. I mean, he knows us pretty well.

My point is, the authors of the Bible compared God's society in Heaven to a kingdom because that's what they knew. Had they lived in a republic it would probably be the Republic of Heaven.

Theoretically heaven is paradise. It's a perfect society, so that would mean no one would be doing anything wrong. Heaven isn't something I've studied because my church doesn't focus on it. I don't think I've ever heard a sermon preached on it in my church, come to think of it. Anyway, the whole bit about heaven being anarchy was just a random thought I was throwing out there.

Yes, our free will can impose upon others. That's an aspect of fate: something we can't control. I'm curious, you don't believe in God but you talk like you believe in predestination. I'm just wondering about your personal beliefs on the subject.

Good verses, btw. As I said, I think God will know the outcomes of all the choices we make, no matter what choice we make but it's up to us to choose which way we go.

I wouldn't say his nature is fallable. It's just no one said life was fair.

Another random question: are you always online xD You always have a new post everytime I pop back in here... it blows my mind.
Reply
Thread Archive {Hot topics}

Goto Page: 1 2 [>] [»|]
 
Manage Your Items
Other Stuff
Get GCash
Offers
Get Items
More Items
Where Everyone Hangs Out
Other Community Areas
Virtual Spaces
Fun Stuff
Gaia's Games
Mini-Games
Play with GCash
Play with Platinum