|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2006 7:53 pm
Well, in school were doing alot of stuff on the Civil war. It's really interesting. I'm learning alot that I didn't know about. Well, were doing a seminar tomorrow and I was wondering how people would respond to this question... If you believe you are right, and your cause is just, is war an acceptable coice? A productive choice? The best choice? By the way, If you would like a good read on the Civil war, Killer Angels by Michael Shaara is awesome.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2006 7:58 pm
War is never an acceptable choice. Humans just happen to be violent by nature and war is one of our mistakes.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2006 8:03 pm
I agree with that. War is very horrible, my dad was in Iraq not too long ago. I think that it is one of the faults with human nature. There will always be someone too closed minded or too stubborn, and unfortunately it leads to war.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2006 9:32 pm
it really depends on the situation when it comes to whether or not war is acceptable and as much as some people dont want to admit it will always be necessary to be ready for war. this is because there will always be someone who is willing to use violence to achieve his or her goals.
As far as war being acceptable i need only to point to world war two. i doubt that there is any one out there that feels that our decision to go to war was unacceptable. it is of course, necessary to look at the culture in which this question is being asked because in our culture life is held sacred and because war involves the loss of life there are going to be less situations in which our culture views war as acceptable. in contrast you need only to look at islam or the culture of ancient Japan in which an honorable death is/was celebrated and thus makes war acceptable in more situations.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2006 10:00 pm
There are no blacks and whites on anything, we only have a bunch of grays.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2006 5:26 am
There are several jingoistic responses to the question but the one that comes closest to the truth is that freedom isn't free. It's a little too simplistic to say that we are just violent by nature and that leads to war. Perhaps in certain hot spot situations like the middle east where it seems to be an eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth but in the global sense we do what we can to avoid war.
I believe World War II was the best example for tactics. In order to have the best battle tactics you have to have real time information on where the enemy is, their strength in arms, armor, and munitions and what tactics they depend upon for offense and defense. With the development of reconnaisance aircraft, radio, radar and sonar giving real time information the planning of battles became an art form.
What's so civil about war anyway?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2006 8:26 am
I know this is off topic, I apologize for that but it seems like the perfect place to post this. Whether you support what is going on in the middle east or not our troops are there. They are our Mothers and Fathers, Sisters and Brothers, Sons and Daughters. They deserve our support throughout the year and especially at this time of the year.
TWAS THE NIGHT BEFORE CHRISTMAS, HE LIVED ALL ALONE, IN A ONE BEDROOM HOUSE MADE OF PLASTER AND STONE.
I HAD COME DOWN THE CHIMNEY WITH PRESENTS TO GIVE, AND TO SEE JUST WHO IN THIS HOME DID LIVE.
I LOOKED ALL ABOUT, A STRANGE SIGHT I DID SEE, NO TINSEL, NO PRESENTS, NOT EVEN A TREE.
NO STOCKING BY MANTLE, JUST BOOTS FILLED WITH SAND, ON THE WALL HUNG PICTURES OF FAR DISTANT LANDS.
WITH MEDALS AND BADGES, AWARDS OF ALL KINDS, A SOBER THOUGHT CAME THROUGH MY MIND.
FOR THIS HOUSE WAS DIFFERENT, IT WAS DARK AND DREARY, I FOUND THE HOME OF A SOLDIER, ONCE I COULD SEE CLEARLY.
THE SOLDIER LAY SLEEPING, SILENT, ALONE, CURLED UP ON THE FLOOR IN THIS ONE BEDROOM HOME.
THE FACE WAS SO GENTLE, THE ROOM IN SUCH DISORDER, NOT HOW I PICTURED A UNITED STATES SOLDIER.
WAS THIS THE HERO OF WHOM I'D JUST READ? CURLED UP ON A PONCHO, THE FLOOR FOR A BED?
I REALIZED THE FAMILIES THAT I SAW THIS NIGHT, OWED THEIR LIVES TO THESE SOLDIERS WHO WERE WILLING TO FIGHT.
SOON ROUND THE WORLD, THE CHILDREN WOULD PLAY, AND GROWNUPS WOULD CELEBRATE A BRIGHT CHRISTMAS DAY.
THEY ALL ENJOYED FREEDOM EACH MONTH OF THE YEAR, BECAUSE OF THE SOLDIERS, LIKE THE ONE LYING HERE.
I COULDN'T HELP WONDER HOW MANY LAY ALONE, ON A COLD CHRISTMAS EVE IN A LAND FAR FROM HOME.
THE VERY THOUGHT BROUGHT A TEAR TO MY EYE, I DROPPED TO MY KNEES AND STARTED TO CRY.
THE SOLDIER AWAKENED AND I HEARD A ROUGH VOICE, "SANTA DON'T CRY, THIS LIFE IS MY CHOICE;
I FIGHT FOR FREEDOM, I DON'T ASK FOR MORE, MY LIFE IS MY GOD, MY COUNTRY, MY CORPS."
THE SOLDIER ROLLED OVER AND DRIFTED TO SLEEP, I COULDN'T CONTROL IT, I CONTINUED TO WEEP.
I KEPT WATCH FOR HOURS, SO SILENT AND STILL AND WE BOTH SHIVERED FROM THE COLD NIGHT'S CHILL.
I DIDN'T WANT TO LEAVE ON THAT COLD, DARK, NIGHT, THIS GUARDIAN OF HONOR SO WILLING TO FIGHT.
THEN THE SOLDIER ROLLED OVER, WITH A VOICE SOFT AND PURE, WHISPERED, "CARRY ON SANTA, IT'S CHRISTMAS DAY, ALL IS SECURE."
ONE LOOK AT MY WATCH, AND I KNEW HE WAS RIGHT. "MERRY CHRISTMAS MY FRIEND, AND TO ALL A GOOD NIGHT."
This poem was written by a Marine stationed in Okinawa Japan.
Christmas will be coming soon and some credit is due to our U.S. service men and women for our being able to celebrate these festivities. Let's try in a small way to pay a tiny bit of what we owe. Make people stop and think of our heroes, living and dead, who sacrificed themselves for us.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2006 11:57 am
Chief Chaos There are several jingoistic responses to the question but the one that comes closest to the truth is that freedom isn't free. It's a little too simplistic to say that we are just violent by nature and that leads to war. Perhaps in certain hot spot situations like the middle east where it seems to be an eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth but in the global sense we do what we can to avoid war. Ditto biggrin
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2006 4:00 pm
That was a very touching poem. I liked it alot. Like I said before, totally getting rid of war is just an impossible fantasy, war has been around ever since men have but we do try to avoid it whenever possible. I would like to know however, when is war an acceptable of even a good alternative? And what is a good alternative when negotiations fail? We had that seminar that I mentioned earlier today and some interesting views came up, including this question. One conclusion I came up with was that war is justifyable when a communities/countrys/peoples way of life, or just plain exststance is in jepordy, but I'd like to know what others think of this question, because my little theory is kind of shaky and I'd love to hear inputs and discuss more.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2006 3:42 pm
War may be unacceptable, but sometimes it's completely necessary. Human nature... we're naturally violent and all that bad stuff. Each of us is an individual; we all have varying opinions. When these opinions conflict, we go to war because to us, we are the ones in the right. War in some cases is the only way to institute a change in society, it also teaches us how stupid war actually is.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 03, 2006 1:41 am
I'm pretty much against war but I concede that sometimes it's the only way. I've also noticed that when major wars happen humanity seems to leap forward in one way or another. For example, in World War 2 we saw the development of the first computer, not for the uses it has now but primarily as a tool for war, to crack the German codes. Now days it's altered the very way we live and allowed us to leap forward technologically. But if World War 2 didn't happen, even if the computer still was invented, we'd likely be years behind what we are today. The internet was designed for warfare use as well, but was adapted for everyday use just like the computer. Which begs the question, if you could go back and stop any war in history, would you, knowing you could save many lives (depending on the war) but also possibly destroy life as we know it today?
As for battle strategies, I'll stick with medievil war strategies for now, much simpler, haven't caught up with using all the new technology yet.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 03, 2006 9:36 am
To me, killing in any way is a final effort of survival. I would onyl kill in self deffense, and the same goes with war. War should only be a last resort. For a long time now I thought it was never right to start a fight, because the person to throw the first punch shows a great lack of discipline and respect. The same applies to an entire country. You only do what you need to.
To me...something like WW2 was necesary for us to be involved in, if we didn't fight there was a good chance the nazi's would have had more success. But things like vietnam, Iraq, Korea...these are NOT our fights and I feel like we really shouldn't have started any of them.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2006 12:02 pm
Vietnam was always a questionable action from the start, however when you consider that the war began because of a "reported" attack on an US Navy ship, which later proved false, at least you can understand how we got from adviser status to combatant. Korea was fought to stop the spread of communism and at least prove we were up to it. As much as it was a stalemate it was a necessary war.
The only way to truly prevent/stop war is to make sure that all segments of society are committed to it. There should be no deferments for college, taxes should be levied to pay for it. We're in the fix we're in because none of us are sacrificing. If this was costing us personally we'd feel much stronger than we already do.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2006 9:35 pm
susiowong is correct, it's in our human nature to resort to violence or blaming someone else... after all, we are human.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2006 9:49 pm
ms.celestial susiowong is correct, it's in our human nature to resort to violence or blaming someone else... after all, we are human. yeah i have to agree on the natural violence becaucse all philosophies on the "state of nature" is that all humans have the willingness to use violence to achieve their goals which are going to be selfcentered because of what the "state of nature" is like
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|