|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 2:12 pm
Ok, for those who don't have a very extended vocabulary, or were just never tought, abstinance is waiting untill your married loose your virginity. Now in a very mature state of mind I wish to hear from you people, your thoughts on this.
My thoughts are although abstinance has good intintions, I feel that you shouldn't have to wait to have intercourse with a person you really think you are going to be with. Me and my girlfriend, for example, we have been together for 7 months. Though we are not of age, we have before. Its just life. I do honestly feel we will be together for ever. Though this sounds predictable, I feel its true. Now, I'm not saying the first girl you get up with and have feelings for you should do it. I'm saying you will know when the right person comes, and you shouldn't have to wait just to do that. I also realize there are other ways to express your love such as a harmless kiss, or perhaps a gift. I as well do those things for my girlfriend. There is just nothing wrong with not being abstinant in my opinion.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 4:41 pm
I believe that you can have it before marriage if you're mature enough, and you're doing it with a person you love.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
Psycho Maniac Bubble Crew
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pyromaniacal Wave Captain
|
Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 6:13 pm
Actually... abstinance is not having sex, period, whether it's for a week or for the rest of your life that you choose to be abstinant.
Personally, I think most - empahsis on most - teenagers should be abstinant. However, I have no problems with sex before marriage. What if you don't get married until you're 30? I certainly think that most 20-somethings are mature enough to deal with having a sexual relationship.
As long as you know the dangers, both the emotional and physical and how to protect yourself, even more casual-ish stuff can be fun as long as you handle it maturely and make sure you don't go overboard with the number of partners and such. That depends on the person, though. I think don't think I could sleep with someone if I didn't love them. One night stands aren't my thing.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2006 8:48 am
Moonlit Shadowess I believe that you can have it before marriage if you're mature enough, and you're doing it with a person you love. Totally QFE! My boyfriend and I have been together for 11 months (hell of a long time for us fickle teenagers, eh? biggrin ), and if it weren't for me being only 14 I probably would have screwed him by now or be seriously considering doing it. As is, I consider myself a mature person (I mean, I sure don't always act like it, but I'm mature on the inside XD), and I could definitely handle it before marriage and maybe even before 18 >.> I tend to move pretty quickly in all aspects of my life (I'm pretty much always the youngest in any sort of group), so why not sex? I'm gonna graduate from high school at age 16, and I'll be damned if I'm going to spend the first two whole years of my college life without having sex XD And Matt -- high-five for deep teenage relationships! biggrin
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2006 4:46 pm
Yes it is true abstinace is a 100 percent way to prevent STD's and what not, but seriously, if your with the gilr you are seriously going to marry, why wait? Why wait if you love someone enough? Sex is a good thing, and it always will be. By the way, I'm 16, and my gf is 14. Were only 1 year and 2 months apart so no one jump on me and call me child molester. We did this when I was 15 anyway. Being young isn't bad. Yes it will wind up worse if she was to get pregnant, but thats what birth controll is for. Your not supposed to be dense and have sex without it. The only problem is it is scary, waiting to know if she is or not. We thought she was in the beginning. She was late by like 5 days. She said she was late and was going to tell her mom everything. I told her to wait, and so she did. Thank god she finally started. We were relieved. I guess we didn't learn though. Then again it is our choice? Our parents in my opinion are too over protective. Can they really expect teens not to even though its influance is EVERYWHERE? I can't even go in a public batrhroom without fliers about sex in the stalls. Its crazy. And condoms are free at Heath Cliniks. It's like they are giving us the opportunity but wont let us have it at the same time. Its a tes is all it is! I failed, but my parents don't know this...
*High fives all dorky like and trips*
Ok, that does not change the dramatic impact my speech has inflicted on your lives!
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2006 10:00 pm
It was probably the stress of wondering if she was preganant that caused her to be late. It's weird how that works.
I think yes, parents can be overbearing, but at the same time, I think they have reason to be. What if she really was pregnant? I bet you'd agree with them, at least in part. Even if you use BC, it's not a hundred percent. I'd hate to be that one or two percent that gets stuck with a kid, talk about ruining the rest of your teenage life.
I consider myself a mature person, but I couldn't have handled it when I was 13 or 14. I freaked out when I was late, even knowing I was abstinant, God knows why, I thought I was sick or sperm could fly or something - but then again, I used to be off by months - damn periods when you're younger are so irregular.
Anyway... I consider 11 months more than serious. Like you said, if you weren't 14, I'd be rooting you on. Iunno what age I'd say, okay go for it, though... 18, 19 maybe? But I'm semi-conservative when it comes to sex.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
Pyromaniacal Wave Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 9:02 am
Starblasted I freaked out when I was late, even knowing I was abstinant, God knows why, I thought I was sick or sperm could fly or something I've done that on occasion XD I'm usually pretty regular, but a couple months ago I was 5 days late and I really started freaking out. I had to keep reminding myself you can't get pregnant off a toilet seat or anything... I think the reasons places hand out free condoms is because they're afraid that despite their badgering to abstain, we won't, and if we're gonna have sex ANYWAY they might as well help us do it safely. It does kinda send a mixed message, though :/ The fact that getting pregnant at my age would be way worse than at 17 or 18 is one of the reasons there's no way in hell I'd have sex yet. I mean, sure, you can use birth control, but what if there's a hole in the condom or you forget to take a pill or something? I mean, sure, if you use multiple forms of contraceptives at once it's a slim, slim chance, but I think even a slim, slim chance isn't worth it right now. Also, consider that once you start having sex you're going to keep having sex, and the earlier you start the longer you'll have until you're old enough to really care for a baby, and the more times you have sex before then the more chances something'll go wrong. (Did that make sense?) Lol Matt I'm 14 and my boyfriend's 16! High-five again xd And dude, this thread is an actual DISCUSSION. We haven't had a real discussion around here in ages. I like this. biggrin
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 12:57 pm
Ok, well lets think for a minute. She gets pregnant..I'm not the type of person to leave her high and dry and pregnant. I'm going to stay with her, and we will have the baby. (Yes, we have discussed this.) I love her, and I feel it is ok to do it if you know the risks. Yes her and I understand those risks, we understand she may get pregnant. Why let that stop us? Will she not get pregnant anyway eventually? I'm going to be honest, though my parents want me to go to college, I don't want to. I want to become a firefighter, and I don't need college to do that. I wouldn't ruin my college because I may not go. A baby isn't a bad thing, nor is sex. If you really feel you and your "mate" are mature enough to handle the physical and emotional pains that come with sex, as well as the pleasures, then go for it. Yes, it is true there is more psychological effects than physical when it comes to sex. But honestly, it does bring you closer. Think, for those brief few moments, your are one. For those brief few moments, you are touching, skin on skin, sharing something special that only 2 people who care alot about eachother should do. Now, I'm not saying sex is gauranteed to keep a relationship together eaither. That is a problem in itself. What if me and my girlfriend were to break up? Then we through away our virginity for nothing. Honestly, if you were to hook up with a guy/gilr and found out he/she wasn't a virgin at 14 would you even consider staying with them? That is a big problem. But I still say, if you know the risks abstinance isn't all its cracked up to be. There is some pleasure to sex. Now, once again, I'm NOT telling you to go have sex just because you think you love your "mate" enough. Do it because you both see it fit.
Yes it is true as well, when you have sex once, you want it again which unfortunitly only greatens the chance of her getting pregnant. But it is worth it in my opinion.
I think it is crap that sex influance is everywhere. Why? Why put it out there if we can't have it? Honestly, does that not make a teen want it more? My parents told me they don't want me having sex, but if I must, use a condom. They would give me the condom. Mixed signals so bad. But seriously, maybe your right brainrape. Perhaps they wish you not to, but if you are going to, then help you do it safely. Fortunitly, my friends give me the condom's I use which is another problem. How well was it taken care of before I got it? Another problem..My last one was too small. How can I know if this one is the right size. Sex is very complicated, but worht the risks I think.
Wow, these are all just big coincidences..Or not, perhaps the government has planned this all brainrape. I'm glad you like the discussion, it is nice to discuss things with your peers at a mature level.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shadow of an Illusion Crew
|
Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 2:49 pm
To be completely honest, I don't really think sex at 13 or 14 is a good idea. (Yep, I'm a spoil sport) I know some people might be mature enough but it's hard to tell when you're that age, everyone thinks they're mature. But if you do, well then you may as well have the free condom. I've got 6th year conference next week. We should get handed out condoms. It sounds... interesting. I can't quite remember what I've signed up for but I'm avoiding the testicular cancer one and I'm going to an aromatherapy and massage one.
You know if they didn't tell you to use a condom you'd still have the sex anyway. It's much better to know about it and teaching you about it is NOT giving approval. Some people need taught, I've heard of crisp packets being used instead of condoms. A few months ago a 12 yr old had a baby. That's her life ruined becuase she didn't know that you could get pregnant first time.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 5:06 pm
I'm not even suggesting that there will be a problem, in you leaving her (the following is not meant to be an attack against you personally, just reasons why I think teenagers shouldn't perhaps wait.)
If she gets pregnant, it'll be HER who has to deal with caryring the baby, the humiliation of having everyone who knows her KNOW that she's a teenage mother, having to give birth, and then raise a child. You don't have to deal with exactly the same thing, as a male - if she gets pregnant, no random stranger can see who got her pregnant, they can only see that she's the one who's pregnant - hence all the blame is on her shoulders. I think this is why GIRLS are more conservative and wary about having sex, they're the ones guaranteed to be stuck with consequences. If a guy really freaks out, he can get out of the situation, he's not tied to the kid after his donation.
This is something the girl has to have to live with for the rest of her life. And I'd hate to think of because of one night of passion she ends up resenting a poor little baby who did nothing wrong but be conceived. It's the child who stands to lose a lot here, What kind of life can they have if they have parents wo can't even care for themselves? Going back to school is near impossible when you have a baby to care for - and you can't have a great job for the same reasons - no education and no time.
So I guess my point would be, I think once you finish highschool, it'd be worth, considering sex - because at least you have a decent amount of education and a shot at a good life, kid or no kid. Up until then, no matter how slight a chance there is you'll get pregnant, the risk isn't worth screwing up your or your child's or your own life. Imagine how many people think - Oh, it won't happen to me. I'd hate to be the one it does happen to.
I think giving out condoms is a great thing to do, because we know no matter how stupid it is, that teenagers are going to have sex. Fact of life. Like Kori said, safe sex is better than the alternative, which of course is having sex unprotected, rather than not at all as people would like to think
As for sex being used to show affection between two people - I think this argument is wasted. If you have to have sex with them in order to show someone you care, then you never really cared at all. Making out and other sexual things, like oral - which personally I think is completely different than intercourse, and okay for teenagers to do, because pregnancy is out of the question and VERY few teens have STIs compared to other age groups, and they can be protected against on the small off chance they are there - are good for that too, and I hope you wouldn't do that with anyone other than your mate.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
Pyromaniacal Wave Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 5:56 pm
Starblasted Going back to school is near impossible when you have a baby to care for Yes. A girl who goes to my school got pregnant last year, but she was still going to school and all. She hasn't been to school at ALL this year, though. She had the baby a few days after labor day. She came in one day during lunch just to show us the baby, but hasn't actually BEEN to school at all, even though I had the impression she was going to come back once she had the kid. Also, I'm pretty sure the guy who got her pregnant is now out of the picture... so she's pretty much stuck with a kid and no education confused Starblasted As for sex being used to show affection between two people - I think this argument is wasted. If you have to have sex with them in order to show someone you care, then you never really cared at all. I think that's a decent point, but not completely true, either. Sex is a natural drive. Some people honestly need sex. If you really love someone, you should be able to wait as long as they need you to, but if you really honestly have a powerful biological sex drive you can't wait forever. And us teenagers sure as hell have a powerful sex drive lol Starblasted Making out and other sexual things, like oral - which personally I think is completely different than intercourse, and okay for teenagers to do, because pregnancy is out of the question and VERY few teens have STIs compared to other age groups, and they can be protected against on the small off chance they are there - are good for that too, and I hope you wouldn't do that with anyone other than your mate. This is something I wanted to say but forgot to in my last post on this thread. I agree that manual and oral sex are very different from intercourse because of the no-pregnancy thing (assuming, of course, you're very careful to clean up thoroughly afterwards and keep all sperm away from all vaginas). I think non-intercourse teen sex is very different from intercourse teen sex, but still requires a lot of thought and careful consideration before anything actually happens. This discussion has made me think a lot about this stuff, and I think I've decided I'd be willing to have non-intercourse sex sooner that I'd previously predicted ( ninja ), but intercourse is definitely waiting until I'm at least out of high school. Here's some more food for thought! What do you guys consider losing one's virginity? Does oral count? What if you've had a**l sex but not vaginal? Are you still a virgin? How far can you go without losing the title? I've sat down and thought about this before and decided that I actually couldn't consider someone a virgin if they've done anything intended to lead to orgasm. That'd be vaginal, a**l, oral, manual, pretty much anything. Obviously, there's a big difference between someone who's only done oral and someone who's gone the whole 9 yards, but I couldn't in good conscience call myself a real virgin if I'd done any of that stuff. Wow, I sure can ramble on about this gonk Edit: lol, I think Kristy actually rambled more. pervert rofl
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 6:49 pm
Not once did I directly say that sex is the only way to show affection. I realize there are less drastic ways to show affection. That was a decision we as a couple decided was a good one. As it was, I wouldn't say it brought us closer, it did far from that. Perhaps I used the wrong terminology last post. It made us see things differently. We looked at eachother differently. We were no longer a couple who claimed they loved eachother. We are now a couple whom has proven our love. Yes you can prove love in other fashions. I understand. We just decided to prove our love in a higher, more serious approach. Its not like we have sex constantly either. We do it about once every 3 to 4 months. And we have currently only done it once.
If she was to get pregnant, I would stand beside her. I realize it was my "donation" and I would definantly feel responsible. I don't think it is right that the gilr is left with the kid, the financial problems, and the loss of a life that could have actually went somewhere. I feel it takes two to make a baby, so it takes to to raise on properly. And I will stay with her if she were to get pregnant, and even if she isn't or wont get pregnant, I still want to be with her. And if anyone wants to pin the blame on her, they will talk to me first, and I will speak my mind. (I'm really good at that, hince why I joined this guild. Its just I usually don't have a civil tongue.) I can honestly say I love my girlfriend. I can honestly say we are going to get married. We have both talked about all of this for the past 2 months or so.
To be honest we have also had unprotected sex. It was after I through my condom off because someone walked in. I'll tell the story if anyone is interested. Otherwise, I'm not going to waste my time. But anyways, she said ow every time I put it in. I realize it hurts, but we were doing better with the condom, which is why I gots another one.
We have also done the oral and the what not. We have done it all except a**l which is the dumbest for of sex in the world!
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 6:58 pm
Matt, I'd like to hear that story (toned down to stay in PG13 limits, of course). I'm wondering why you'd take the risks of unprotected sex at such a young age...
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 9:57 pm
Of course, it's all your choice, I'm not trying to preech to you, here, I'm just stating what I personally think the right thing to do is.
I, too, wonder why you'd have unprotected sex? I understand if she did get pregnant you plan to stand by her, but shouldn't your goal be to not get her pregnant at all? Why bother take the chance, when changing a condom is fairly easy?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
Pyromaniacal Wave Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 8:36 am
Starblasted Why bother take the chance, when changing a condom is fairly easy? There's also a possibility they didn't have any more condoms... But in that case, I'd say they should've given up on having intercourse right then and there, maybe done something else, and had proper protected sex another time confused
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|