|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Tue Oct 05, 2004 7:59 pm
I mean, come on. Let's look at the facts. People who're prolife don't have abortions. So our children will all live and be taught to value life the way we value it.
People who abort will have more trouble having kids and die more than women die in childbirth. so they won't be able to instill those values of free love (let's face it, RvW was decided with the whole drugs and sex culture) and no worries in their children, because their children are either killed or nonexistant.
So in a few hundred years, it'll all be thinned out and abortion will be a thing of the past.
The prolife solution to fighting abortion?
Make lots of babies. Lots and lots of babies who will have voting power at the age 18........
lol sorry, that was just my little frustrated world domination plan of the day.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 05, 2004 8:11 pm
oh yes. and next time someone says it's my body, my choice, tell them you're driving drunk.
it's your body.
Why should the government have a right to tell you what to do with your body?
"But it's dangerous. you might get killed or kill someone else!"
"Abortion's dangerous. You might get killed and you definitely kill someone else."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 06, 2004 4:09 am
As I stated before, abortion is a human rights issue, it can't be decided by simply a majority. You could have 1% of the population as pro-life and if we proved that a fetus was a person than they would be legally obligated to outlaw abortions.
The reason we fight now, is because of all the people who are dying while we sit and wait for someone else to fight and fix it. Marches aren't going to do anything, you have to get out there and fight for it.
What's to stop your kids from waiting for their kids to do it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 06, 2004 2:12 pm
toxic_lollipop As I stated before, abortion is a human rights issue, it can't be decided by simply a majority. You could have 1% of the population as pro-life and if we proved that a fetus was a person than they would be legally obligated to outlaw abortions.
The reason we fight now, is because of all the people who are dying while we sit and wait for someone else to fight and fix it. Marches aren't going to do anything, you have to get out there and fight for it.
What's to stop your kids from waiting for their kids to do it? I think what Kate's saying is that if we wait long enough, -everyone- will be Pro-Life, because the Pro-'Choice'rs families will all die out by then. Of course, I bet she's just joking too...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 06, 2004 3:54 pm
I.Am toxic_lollipop As I stated before, abortion is a human rights issue, it can't be decided by simply a majority. You could have 1% of the population as pro-life and if we proved that a fetus was a person than they would be legally obligated to outlaw abortions.
The reason we fight now, is because of all the people who are dying while we sit and wait for someone else to fight and fix it. Marches aren't going to do anything, you have to get out there and fight for it.
What's to stop your kids from waiting for their kids to do it? I think what Kate's saying is that if we wait long enough, -everyone- will be Pro-Life, because the Pro-'Choice'rs families will all die out by then. Of course, I bet she's just joking too... yep. lol. don't worry, I'm not giving up. For some very odd reason, prolife is extremely important to me. I haven't been negatively affected by abortion in ways that I'm aware of (although we're all affected by it because people who're supposed to exist don't exist and we never know these people). If I was told "Abortion will be made illegal in all states except for saving the mother's life on one condition. You die a prolonged and excrutiatingly painful death," I'd say, alright. I dunno if I'd do that with anything else I believe. maybe. I doubt it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 06, 2004 6:37 pm
Nice theory, but the only problem with it is that not all Pro-Choicers have abortions or ever want to get abortions. Only real flaw whee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 06, 2004 7:00 pm
i just thinjk that if you are responcible anuff to have sex, that you should be responcible to dill with the conciqinces.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 06, 2004 8:09 pm
original godsmack i just thinjk that if you are responcible anuff to have sex, that you should be responcible to dill with the conciqinces. problem is, because abortion is so easily obtained, you don't have to be responsible to have sex. A fetus is an STD, now, and a cure is easily obtained. If you get pregnant, you can eliminate the "problem"...even without parental consent if you're a minor. Second trimester abortions are legal in many states. We don't have to be responsible anymore! Just try telling someone, you shouldn't have sex until you're ready to have a kid. "WHat? WHat? Not everyone wants kids, should we only have sex if we're having kids?" Doesn't mean that, it means don't start until you're ready to deal with a pregnancy if it ever happens, and I don't mean using abortion. "Why? Why're your morals better than mine?" Because I'm right, you're wrong, have a nice day. lol well...I wish I could say that and get away with it. But seriously, if you're not emotionally, mentally, and physically ready to have a child, it stands to reason you're not ready for sex either. Considering that's what sex is for, procreation. And an expression of love, but it's really not for kids. Too many ways to take the easy way out. sad
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2004 6:47 pm
lymelady original godsmack i just thinjk that if you are responcible anuff to have sex, that you should be responcible to dill with the conciqinces. problem is, because abortion is so easily obtained, you don't have to be responsible to have sex. A fetus is an STD, now, and a cure is easily obtained. If you get pregnant, you can eliminate the "problem"...even without parental consent if you're a minor. Second trimester abortions are legal in many states. We don't have to be responsible anymore! Just try telling someone, you shouldn't have sex until you're ready to have a kid. "WHat? WHat? Not everyone wants kids, should we only have sex if we're having kids?" Doesn't mean that, it means don't start until you're ready to deal with a pregnancy if it ever happens, and I don't mean using abortion. "Why? Why're your morals better than mine?" Because I'm right, you're wrong, have a nice day. lol well...I wish I could say that and get away with it. But seriously, if you're not emotionally, mentally, and physically ready to have a child, it stands to reason you're not ready for sex either. Considering that's what sex is for, procreation. And an expression of love, but it's really not for kids. Too many ways to take the easy way out. sad Yea, thats pretty true. I just get pissed how young people have sex so irresponsibly, and then just abort just like that, as if it were a sick game, or its just easy to have an abortion. Blah, just like that, now your parents won't find out, etc etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 22, 2004 4:07 pm
I.Am toxic_lollipop As I stated before, abortion is a human rights issue, it can't be decided by simply a majority. You could have 1% of the population as pro-life and if we proved that a fetus was a person than they would be legally obligated to outlaw abortions.
The reason we fight now, is because of all the people who are dying while we sit and wait for someone else to fight and fix it. Marches aren't going to do anything, you have to get out there and fight for it.
What's to stop your kids from waiting for their kids to do it? I think what Kate's saying is that if we wait long enough, -everyone- will be Pro-Life, because the Pro-'Choice'rs families will all die out by then. Of course, I bet she's just joking too... This needs to go in a sig
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 07, 2004 5:56 pm
Jacki Jinx Nice theory, but the only problem with it is that not all Pro-Choicers have abortions or ever want to get abortions. Only real flaw whee Yeah. The ones who don't have abortions are the ones with the most annoying and hipocritical argument: I don't think it's right; I would never do it myself, but the woman has the right to choose. So, they teach that to their kids...and we've got a problem...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 07, 2004 7:34 pm
There are several types of abortionists.
-Promiscuous people
-People who wish they had been aborted
-Nihilists
-People who think it will get them votes
-People who think it will get them money
-The Zero Population Growth types
-Moral Relativists
-People who seem to think it's their right to decide for the unborn whether the world is worth entering
Given these facts, it's no wonder we can't get them to listen to reason.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 07, 2004 11:14 pm
Diadema Jacki Jinx Nice theory, but the only problem with it is that not all Pro-Choicers have abortions or ever want to get abortions. Only real flaw whee Yeah. The ones who don't have abortions are the ones with the most annoying and hipocritical argument: I don't think it's right; I would never do it myself, but the woman has the right to choose. So, they teach that to their kids...and we've got a problem... What are you talking about, hypocritical? It makes just as much sense as my good old standby, "I myself would never stab my teacher with a knife if I failed, but other students have a right to choose." Gotten out of a lot of F's that way, doncha know... I'm jk, I hate that argument. Mm, but then the only people pro-abortion think it's a woman's right to choose but wouldn't ever do it. so once it dropped down to about 7 abortions a year, they'd start realizing what a prolife crowd it is that's voting for them and overturn it.....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2005 9:33 am
I should read more often.
They took me seriously in another guild.....
Gotta love satire.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2005 9:47 am
As long as the concept of Pro-Choice exists, there will always be pro-choice people. The very idea of it is what we will have to constantly fight against.
The fact is, there will always be children who disagree with their parents, and as sex becomes more and more liberal, it's definitely going to continually be an issue of pro-choice vs pro-life.
People want to keep having sex, so they will ask for individualistic benefits for it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
