Welcome to Gaia! ::

Reply The Pro-life Guild
catch 22 Goto Page: 1 2 [>] [»|]

Quick Reply

Enter both words below, separated by a space:

Can't read the text? Click here

Submit

andyz cool

PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 6:59 am


Ok, so here's the thing, lets go back to what America was like pre the Row V Wade disaster:

If a girl got pregnant before she was married, she was considered a slut, and was viewed as a social outcast. Churches and religious organizations were hesitant to help out people like that because it was their fault they got in this mess in the first place. I'm not saying they didn't help, i'm quite sure people did, but not to the extent they do today, and not without a lot of judgment. I'm sure more was done to help the child then the mother to any extent.

Ok, now today, abortion is legal, and as a result, people are a lot more compassionate and caring toward women who have gotten pregnant. A lot more helpful and a lot less judgmental. In a way, abortion has forced charitable organizations to step up and respect people reguardless of their circumstance. As far as religious stuff goes, everybody likes to forget that little story about the prostitute that was going to have rocks hurled at her until she died because of her sins before Jesus told them 'whoever is without sin can cast the first stone.' Translation: one sin is no worse then another, just the results of such. Me calling in 'sick' to work when i just don't want to come in is just as bad a sin as the person who has sex and becomes, or causes someone to become pregnant. Nobody had that kind of an atitude toward women back in the 60's, and probably there's quite a few that don't get it today. In a very real way, these people are responsible for the abortion disaster we're experiencing today.

All that to say this: Would we have had such a cultural shift in awareness if not for abortion becoming legal? and do you think, if it becomes illegal, we run the risk of becoming a society like that again?
PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 7:08 am


I doubt we would have had such a shift in awareness if it was not legal, however I doubt that if we were to make abortion illegal that we would completely revert back to that. In all honestly, that change has been made. And now the church will be more keen to help the mother and child through councelling, prenatal care, etc. So that she doesn't become hopeless, or prompted to get an ''illegal abortion'' or cause herself to miscarry. Although I do believe that they will put slightly more value on the baby then on the mother. As is natural, due to the fact that she got herself into the situation in the first place.

If that makes sense.

Honestly I have mixed views on this discussion. I'll post again after I've thought a bit more about it.

Madame Macabre


Broorel

PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 7:14 am


I honestly don't think abortion has made Christians more tolerant of sexual promiscuity, I just think the fact that we now have to worry about women killing their children has eclipsed the worry of casual sex.

Of course the sex is leading to the abortions, so it's still an issue, but stopping a woman from having an abortion is more dire than beratting her for having sex.

I think that had abortion remained illegal, views on promiscuity would have remained the same. Honestly, I don't think views on promiscuity have changed even with the legalization of abortion. The only thing that's changed is priorities.
PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 8:53 am


That and *sounding like a broken record XD*, we all know that society still isn't quite there yet regarding pregnant women. They may not be thrown out of the house ot locked in their bedrooms anymore but they are still getting abortions. If things are supposed to be better for pregnant women....something is not adding up since so many women are still trying to stop being pregnant.

Cyanna


andyz cool

PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 9:06 am


Broorel
I honestly don't think abortion has made Christians more tolerant of sexual promiscuity, I just think the fact that we now have to worry about women killing their children has eclipsed the worry of casual sex.

Of course the sex is leading to the abortions, so it's still an issue, but stopping a woman from having an abortion is more dire than beratting her for having sex.

I think that had abortion remained illegal, views on promiscuity would have remained the same. Honestly, I don't think views on promiscuity have changed even with the legalization of abortion. The only thing that's changed is priorities.


Well, science and logic always have and always will favor abstinance until marriage, and i think poor philosophies about things like casual sex SHOULD be discriminated against by society as a whole, but, one sin does not trump the other according to the bible, just the repercussions for the actions. I think there are positive sides to frowning on poor sexual practices, as long as it's aimed at males and females, but i don't think we have the right to shove that in their faces, or to say their sin is worse then any other.

Honestly though, a lot of the problem is with women. I'm sorry if this offends you, but men have always discriminated against women with poor sexual histories, where as women don't usualy even question men about theirs. If you want it to cut both ways, you have to start treating the men who behave poorly the same way as they do women. It only makes sense.
PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 10:22 am


MiNdCaNdY

Well, science and logic always have and always will favor abstinance until marriage, and i think poor philosophies about things like casual sex SHOULD be discriminated against by society as a whole, but, one sin does not trump the other according to the bible, just the repercussions for the actions. I think there are positive sides to frowning on poor sexual practices, as long as it's aimed at males and females, but i don't think we have the right to shove that in their faces, or to say their sin is worse then any other.

Honestly though, a lot of the problem is with women. I'm sorry if this offends you, but men have always discriminated against women with poor sexual histories, where as women don't usualy even question men about theirs. If you want it to cut both ways, you have to start treating the men who behave poorly the same way as they do women. It only makes sense.


Offensive or not, you're right. As a society, men being sexually promiscuous is viewed as "ok" or not as big a deal as women having casual sex. Women are viewed as the ones who are supposed to be first and foremost, emotional. Which leads to the whole emotional attachment deal, which depending on the argument could lead into the abortion debate.

However, women can't always be the ones to do all the work. Women can't be expected to change the way they're conditioned to view men, and their sexual history, if society doesn't change it either. And society has had a huge impact on how casual sex and abortions are viewed by both men and women.

Quote:
Would we have had such a cultural shift in awareness if not for abortion becoming legal? and do you think, if it becomes illegal, we run the risk of becoming a society like that again?


Unfortunately, no, I don't think society runs the risk of becoming like that again. In my opinion, its really no different than certain drugs being illegal. It's not stopping anyone from participating in that practice. And as much as I want abortion illeaglized, its still not going to stop the practice simply because people will still have the attitude conditioned by society that its "ok". Oh sure, it may deter a small mass of people who wouldn't do anything to break the law because they find breaking the law morally wrong (which makes no sense when you consider the whole murder aspect of it); but then you'll have the people who think it should've still be legal and will continue to practice or aid others in the practice of abortion.

As a society we have a long way to go before all the kinks will be worked out of the idea of illegalizing abortion.

FYI: the woman in the bible story was commiting adultery not prostitution.

Hillbilly Hikari

Sarcastic Bibliophile

31,600 Points
  • Partygoer 500
  • Attending the Ball 25
  • Happy Birthday! 100

divineseraph

PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 10:29 am


illegalizing it will make the corporate structure of abortion crumble. since it will be illegal, the clinics will not be open long. there may be some "back alley" abortions, but there will be stings, undoubtedly. and they will likely be dangerous. which i honestly don't mind. if a woman is willing to die to kill the life inside her, which she consensually created, let her.
PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 10:42 am


divineseraph
illegalizing it will make the corporate structure of abortion crumble. since it will be illegal, the clinics will not be open long. there may be some "back alley" abortions, but there will be stings, undoubtedly. and they will likely be dangerous. which i honestly don't mind. if a woman is willing to die to kill the life inside her, which she consensually created, let her.


But that's really no different compared to how things are going now. Women are killing the life she consentually created and the law lets her. Seeing her die doing the same thing isn't good at all because now both lives are lost. Even if you think the one party "deserved it" you still have lost the innocent. Two lives lost...I just don't see the justification in the whole thing.

Not all legal abortions are safe....and not all illegal "back alley" abortions were dirty, dangerous ones involving coat hangers. You could say that for a number of abortion cases, the only difference was that women stopped going in through the back door and started using the front one....and in greater numbers.

Cyanna


divineseraph

PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 10:59 am


but it would be foolhardy to believe that there would be the same amount of abortions when it is illegal. there would be no more clinics, it simply couldn't happen as often. there may be a few hundred thousand per year, if that. and even that is a dramatic victory compared to the one and a half million now.
PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 3:37 pm


Oh no, certianly no where near the same amount of abortions would be done for the simple reason that it wouldn't be legal. But it doesn't change the fact that there would still be back alley abortions, both dangerous and non-dangerous. If people want something badly enouigh, they'll find a way to get it whether or not its illegal.

Hillbilly Hikari

Sarcastic Bibliophile

31,600 Points
  • Partygoer 500
  • Attending the Ball 25
  • Happy Birthday! 100

andyz cool

PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 7:53 pm


Hell i can choose to run a red light too if i want, the thing is the government that i pay my taxes to dosn't support such action and will act to stop it.
PostPosted: Thu Aug 17, 2006 10:19 am


Yes but people still run red lights. So while the government may be acting to stop this act they don't support, its still not stopping it completely. Again, the same arghument can go for illegal drugs and for abortion. If the government doesn't support a specific action, yes they will take action to stop it. But that doesn't mean its going to stop completely. Once again stated, if someone wants something bad enough they'll find a way to get it.

Hillbilly Hikari

Sarcastic Bibliophile

31,600 Points
  • Partygoer 500
  • Attending the Ball 25
  • Happy Birthday! 100

andyz cool

PostPosted: Thu Aug 17, 2006 10:34 am


i think we're arguing two different things. I'm arguing government responsibility, you're arguing people's own responsibility. I have to admit that i can't control what people do on their own, nor would i want to. (although having an army of human/robot minions would be cool) I'm saying the government has an obligation to ban abortion, and what should we do to keep the backlash from turning the world into what it was before all these changes came about?
PostPosted: Thu Aug 17, 2006 10:44 am


MiNdCaNdY
(although having an army of human/robot minions would be cool)

^_^ Heh, yeah it would. Course then you'd have to deal with the whole possibility of the world being taken over by robots........ pirate

MiNdCaNdY

I'm saying the government has an obligation to ban abortion, and what should we do to keep the backlash from turning the world into what it was before all these changes came about?


The government does have an obligation to ban abortion, but not in the stead of something worse happening. When you've got the possibilty of losing twice as many lives because of a rash decision to ban abortion through government action. They do need to ban abortion, but it also needs to have the right timing and when other options are available for people to truly engage in safe sex.

Hell, just a few years ago a bill went through congress for people to be licensed to have children. Thankfully it didn't pass, but how scary a thought would that have been??

Then there's the new laws being passed throughout certain states that pharmacists can refuse to fill prescription birth control or sell safe sex items if it goes against their ideals as either Pro-Choice/Life.

So, yes the government needs to just ban abortion. But they need to make it during the right time when other venues and options are available to people who don't necessarily share the Pro-Life view.

Hillbilly Hikari

Sarcastic Bibliophile

31,600 Points
  • Partygoer 500
  • Attending the Ball 25
  • Happy Birthday! 100

andyz cool

PostPosted: Thu Aug 17, 2006 11:20 am


that's where my girlfriend stands, which is the only way i can justify dating someone pro choice. otherwise if i made her pregnant i could be arrested for endangering the welfare of a child blaugh
Reply
The Pro-life Guild

Goto Page: 1 2 [>] [»|]
 
Manage Your Items
Other Stuff
Get GCash
Offers
Get Items
More Items
Where Everyone Hangs Out
Other Community Areas
Virtual Spaces
Fun Stuff
Gaia's Games
Mini-Games
Play with GCash
Play with Platinum