|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2006 3:49 pm
do you guys think Papi and the others will reach at least 60 home runs this year? why or why not?
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2006 3:55 pm
here´s a list of the home run leaders in the MLB:
David Ortiz- 41
Ryan Howard- 41
Alfonso Soriano- 38
Adam Dunn-35
Travis Hafner- 35
Albert Pujols- 35
Jim Thome- 35
Jason Giambi- 34
Carlos Beltran- 33
Lance Berkman- 32
Manny Ramirez- 32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 15, 2006 8:58 am
no one will get 50 or more except howard and big papi there isnt anyone this year that will get 60.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 15, 2006 1:27 pm
At the rate he's going, Ortiz would only hit 56 or 57 HRs (I love math). Same goes for Ryan Howard. I was hoping Pujols would do it, but his injury set him back just a bit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 15, 2006 2:11 pm
NinjaKirby1322 At the rate he's going, Ortiz would only hit 56 or 57 HRs (I love math). Same goes for Ryan Howard. I was hoping Pujols would do it, but his injury set him back just a bit. and yet Pujols remains one of the league leaders! the sports writers said before that injury, he was on pace to break Bonds´record. they said he could´ve hit like 80. surprised well, maybe next season...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 15, 2006 7:43 pm
yeah he was on pace to beating bonds but i dont think next year he will be able to pass barry bonds because all there going to do is walk him.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 3:55 pm
that´s true, he is gonna be a lot more feared next year. same with Papi.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 4:01 pm
no, you need to start out greatto have 60 HRs. you would need like 46 right now to even have a shot at maybe being within one of getting it
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 4:09 pm
icedog123 no, you need to start out greatto have 60 HRs. you would need like 46 right now to even have a shot at maybe being within one of getting it that´s true, but players like Ortiz, Beltran, Pujols, and Howard are known for their performance in the last part of the season. personally, i´m fed up with 60-HR seasons, but this is a new crop of players who might continue to surprise me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 4:18 pm
they are known for that but hitting 60 homers isnt that easy as much as i like those guys i dont think they will make it
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2006 12:47 pm
true, it´s a huge task. sweatdrop
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2006 1:00 pm
who voted for 60 homers is gross?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 18, 2006 3:16 pm
me, i don´t like 60 homers, it´s too many. Roger Maris was an exception, but Mac, Sosa and Bonds just made me feel sick when they did it in close years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 18, 2006 3:17 pm
doc.hyphae me, i don´t like 60 homers, it´s too many. Roger Maris was an exception, but Mac, Sosa and Bonds just made me feel sick when they did it in close years. yes expecially because they all used steroids and Mac and bonds did 70 not 60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 18, 2006 3:30 pm
[[Cloud Strife]] doc.hyphae me, i don´t like 60 homers, it´s too many. Roger Maris was an exception, but Mac, Sosa and Bonds just made me feel sick when they did it in close years. yes expecially because they all used steroids and Mac and bonds did 70 not 60 augh, 70! evil i think i´m gonna be sick! wahmbulance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
