|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 8:05 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 9:09 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 12:11 am
|
|
|
|
Quote: As time draws nearer to the end of times and as the world worsens....should we really have kids at a time like this? I mean...okay...yes we all suffer during our life time....but compare us to 1950...or 1930....look how much worse it's gotten.
Ah yes. So much worse. Cribdeath is way down, we've got antibiotics, improved medical care, the blacks are even allowed their own bus seats now!
(For those who can't tell: that was sarcasm. You think in the 1930s it was better? Don't be silly. Sanitary conditions were below the bar, pneumonia would kill you, your boss could fire you any day he wanted, and more than half of the kids didn't make it through childhood.)
We've been living at the end of times for quite a while now. Ever since Jesus died we've been waiting. Yes, we should be ready for when He returns. But that doesn't mean we should cower in a corner in fear. It means we should have our business together.
That also means that you shouldn't have kids until you're absolutely sure you're able to provide for them. It's estimated that raising a kid 'til he or she is 18 is more than half a million dollars, and that's not counting all the time you'll invest either.
Sure, I'm not saying that everything is peachy-keen in the world. Far from it. There's plenty of things that could and should be improved. But how bad is your life, really? You've got food in your stomach, an education, a place to sleep, and plenty of free time to waste on Gaia.
But does the world need more kiddies? Nah. Adopt one that's already there, if you really feel the need. Most kiddies are born for the selfishness of the parents, who think it'll be fun, or that it'll enrich their life. Most of the rest of them are 'accidents'.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 8:28 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 2:59 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 05, 2006 12:55 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 05, 2006 1:28 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 05, 2006 3:38 pm
|
|
|
|
Quote: it isn't entirely irradicated there will alway be a problem of racism in the world.
But, y'know, having abolished slavery, equal rights (at least in theory), we're going ahead. My local wal-mart is run entirely by hispanics, turks and moroccans. The boss of our local bank is black. (excuse me, european-african-american.)
Quote: because of so much premarital sex there is the giant spread of STD's.
As a practicing Christian who's not planning to do that, I don't see how that has any effect on you.
Quote: prices are LARGELY higher than back then Numero uno: inflation. A dollar now is hardly as much as a dollar then. Dos; how long did you think your grandparents had to save before they could buy a car or a TV? Right now anyone bagging groceries can do that.
Quote: we have more problems with other countries Nah, I doubt that Bush will be president once you've spawned little ones. (though, his son may be... they've pulled one like that already...)
But who am I kidding. I don't think anyone on Gaia is fit to raise children by default.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 05, 2006 5:07 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 05, 2006 5:38 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 05, 2006 11:19 pm
|
|
|
|
Quote: As a practicing Christian who's not planning to do that, I don't see how that has any effect on you.
i was using that as an EXAMPLE for one of the many problems of the world. even if i wait to have sex until marriage, that doesn't mean my husband will have an STD he doesn't know about and accidentally trasmit to me....and btw fyi, there are STD's that can be transmitted just by skin to skin touch. need i say anything more?
Quote: Numero uno: inflation. A dollar now is hardly as much as a dollar then. Dos; how long did you think your grandparents had to save before they could buy a car or a TV? Right now anyone bagging groceries can do that.
okay as a simple example, an ice cream cone at my work place is 1.39, back then it was 10 cents....10 CENTS.....inflation or not, its still a large difference....especially gas prices....man they've risen.
Quote: Nah, I doubt that Bush will be president once you've spawned little ones. (though, his son may be... they've pulled one like that already...)
excuse me? but why does everything have to pertain to Bush? I said nothing about Bush. i enjoy him as a president first of all, and second of all we've always had problems with other countries, only recently have they gotten bad again...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 06, 2006 2:06 am
|
|
|
|
If you'd like to enjoy social security when you retire, then the answer is yes. Seriously, look at Japan: as the oldest nation on earth (demographically speaking), their welfare state is in very real danger of keeling over and dying within a couple of decades. But beyond that, I don't really think that the world is going downhill, so to speak. Quite the contrary, it's entirely possible that we're at the apex of earthly prosperity, what with global warming and peak oil threatening to shred the very foundation of our modern economy. This may be about as good as it gets, folks. But in the end, the question's kind of moot: the instinct to propagate the species is pretty well ingrained in us humans, and so we'll probably keep breeding regardless of what's happening in the world.
SaintChaos okay as a simple example, an ice cream cone at my work place is 1.39, back then it was 10 cents....10 CENTS.....inflation or not, its still a large difference....especially gas prices....man they've risen. Yeah, prices are higher, but that really doesn't matter. What's important is wage/price ratios (i.e. real value). Yes, 'back then' prices were lower, but so were wages. As such, our parents and grandparents didn't actually have more buying power than we do today. In fact, quite a few modern items, such as televisions, are less expensive than their latter-day counterparts, although that's largely due to technological and manufacturing advances and not improved purchasing power. As for gasoline, that's a simply supply/demand problem, one which has been significantly complicated by the fact that much of the world's oil is in the politically volatile Middle East. See Real versus nominal value.
Quote: But who am I kidding. I don't think anyone on Gaia is fit to raise children by default. A bit harsh, don't you think? Most of the people on this site are pretty young. Isn't it a bit premature to judge their eventual parenting abilities based on their current behavior? That'd be rather like looking at a toddler and saying, 'Well he'll clearly never be qualified to drive'.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 06, 2006 2:32 am
|
|
|
|
SaintChaos fyi, there are STD's that can be transmitted just by skin to skin touch. need i say anything more?
No, those are regular diseases, since their transmission doesn't require sex. I do hope you see how you ridiculous you sound; if they can be transmitted by skin contact, they have nothing to do with any sexual behavior we may have or lack, including premarital sex.
Quote: excuse me? but why does everything have to pertain to Bush? I said nothing about Bush. i enjoy him as a president first of all, and second of all we've always had problems with other countries, only recently have they gotten bad again...
Yeah, that was around that time Jeb walked in. Are you old enough to remember the first Persian gulf war? Bush I kicked some Iraqi a** with superior technology and manpower, simply to distract the public from domestic issues.
Bush II tried the same under false pretenses (How many years 'til we find those WMDs?), which horribly backfired. As a result he's got half the world pissed at America.
But we've beaten this dead horse millions of times before. I doubt either one of us will change their opinion on this issue.
Quote: Quote: But who am I kidding. I don't think anyone on Gaia is fit to raise children by default. A bit harsh, don't you think? Most of the people on this site are pretty young. Isn't it a bit premature to judge their eventual parenting abilities based on their current behavior?
I'm sure Gaians can grow to be wonderful parents, given time. However, when most of them are discussing having children here, it seems like they can hardly wait and have no idea what they'd be getting themselves into. It seems we agree on this point.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 7:31 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 9:38 am
|
|
|
|
Quote: No, those are regular diseases, since their transmission doesn't require sex. I do hope you see how you ridiculous you sound; if they can be transmitted by skin contact, they have nothing to do with any sexual behavior we may have or lack, including premarital sex.
excuse me if i base my knowledge off my human sexuality professor >_> the HPV can be transmitted by simple genital to gential contact...and i believe there was another one that was done in the same way. So if you think "I' sound ridiculous, my knowledge comes from a different source other than my own.
Quote: it should be a choice of yours wether or not you have kids, but not the the extreme where if you decide not to you feel the need to kill it. if you want kids, go for it. if not, well, avoid sex or otherwise try not to get pregnant. i am pro-life, so i despise abortion. however, i am not for "mother farms" as some would assume. i just want people to deal with the responsibility that comes with consentual acts of the sexual persuasion, without killing their young.
i dont know about other people, but after watching explicit Birth Giving videos in my human sexuality class....i REALLy dont want to go through pregnancy >_> im allergic to pain.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|