|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sat Jul 22, 2006 8:38 am
To my dismay, Smeg wasnt a word in the new word bump game, although many non-sensical words were. Do you think we should start up a pettition to get Smeg as a word bump word or not? What is your view? Bare in mind, even if you see this as an offencive words, many other words that are offence have been included in the game.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 24, 2006 10:00 am
key_1 To my dismay, Smeg wasnt a word in the new word bump game, although many non-sensical words were. Do you think we should start up a pettition to get Smeg as a word bump word or not? What is your view? Bare in mind, even if you see this as an offencive words, many other words that are offence have been included in the game. What is word bump?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 26, 2006 1:43 am
OliviaOblivia key_1 To my dismay, Smeg wasnt a word in the new word bump game, although many non-sensical words were. Do you think we should start up a pettition to get Smeg as a word bump word or not? What is your view? Bare in mind, even if you see this as an offencive words, many other words that are offence have been included in the game. What is word bump? Its the new Gaian Game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 26, 2006 12:48 pm
I think no one would care. So no one would sign. I'd like it to be in it though because I've made up words and they've allowed it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 26, 2006 8:33 pm
redshirt42 I think no one would care. So no one would sign. I'd like it to be in it though because I've made up words and they've allowed it. Yep. And they let us use slut, rape, rapist and the likes. So why not smeg. But, they also left out a few none offensive words too. Like ment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 28, 2006 5:20 am
Aragosnat redshirt42 I think no one would care. So no one would sign. I'd like it to be in it though because I've made up words and they've allowed it. Yep. And they let us use slut, rape, rapist and the likes. So why not smeg. But, they also left out a few none offensive words too. Like ment. Hopefully they work it all out soon. I would sign the petition. The more smeg the better as far as I'm concerned. biggrin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:06 pm
OliviaOblivia Aragosnat redshirt42 I think no one would care. So no one would sign. I'd like it to be in it though because I've made up words and they've allowed it. Yep. And they let us use slut, rape, rapist and the likes. So why not smeg. But, they also left out a few none offensive words too. Like ment. Hopefully they work it all out soon. I would sign the petition. The more smeg the better as far as I'm concerned. biggrin Agreed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 9:27 am
I don't see what's wrong with the word 'f**' either. Whatever connotaions it has in America, it's a perfectly good word in most parts of the world, with nothing to do with sexuality.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 7:56 pm
evabh I don't see what's wrong with the word 'f**' either. Whatever connotaions it has in America, it's a perfectly good word in most parts of the world, with nothing to do with sexuality. It had to do with the end of cigerets. And besides. f** is something just about everyone knows how to spell.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 9:39 am
Exactly. I wonder why they won't include it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 1:42 pm
OliviaOblivia Exactly. I wonder why they won't include it. Well, they are American, which means they probably don't think of it as a very good word. It might be perfectly fine everywhere else, but we're in the middle of a huge debate over human rights and gay marriage and all those other things over here and they probably think it would just be inflammatory. If they include it they'd likely get all sorts of "Gaia's totally against gays OMG" complaints. gonk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 8:04 am
Yeah, you're probably right. Too bad though, it's a very conveinant word. sad
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 7:10 pm
It is a very conveinant word. I can spell it more times them most of the other words I use.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 10:50 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2006 6:21 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
