Welcome to Gaia! ::

Reply The Pro-life Guild
Pro-choice supporters on Gaia seem to be... Goto Page: 1 2 3 ... 4 5 [>] [»|]

Quick Reply

Enter both words below, separated by a space:

Can't read the text? Click here

Submit

Shahada 2

650 Points
  • Gaian 50
  • Member 100
PostPosted: Thu Apr 21, 2005 9:59 pm


I'm not sure how to put this... fanatics.

I just first have to state that before we get into any of this, we have to realize that NO RESEARCH on Abortion is unbiased. This is what happens to most controversial topics, the research becomes unbiased and goes between groups of people.

Scientists will tell only what they researched in the context they are trying to argue, which is the trouble when it comes to researching controversial topics such as abortion.

Anyway, back to the pro-choice; I just wanted to state that most of their arguments are biased based on the idea that their opinions are always correct. They seems to have a foothold in the ED, however, their hold in the Abortion Debate Guild has worn down.

I'm currently not available to argue that much, and I don't have as much time as she does to go on the ED and voice out my opinion (I'm in college right now, and it's tough, extremely tough).

Anyway I want to post some of their statements here:
Quote:
I am pro choice in almost everything, and this includes abortion. I believe in abortion being on demand, for any reason, at any time. After viability (app 24 weeks), a woman may opt to have a Caesarian and have the fetus removed; before viability, abortion should not be questioned and should be as soon as possible to prevent higher risk methods needing to be used. It is no one's business why a woman should need an abortion, their reasons or rationale, how they got pregnant--any of that. One of the most essential rights of being a person is that no other creature--human or not--has the unchallenged right to use your body resources for their survival. If denial means death for the second person...well, so be it.


And she (who's name I won't state) claims to be both pro-choice and pro-life.

Quote:
As for me, I'm pro-choice and pro-life. Every life a wanted life.

Pro-lifers are NOT pro-life, they are pro-fetus. And once the fetus is born, they want nothing to do with it. They did their job in their eyes. They don't want to fix the adoption system, or provide pre-natal and post-natal care to women who can't afford. Just save the 'widdle babies'.

As Former Supreme Court Justice Blackmun (may he rest in peace) stated: "Women will never be fully emancipated until they can control their own reproduction."

Doing otherwise keeps women as they have been for many hundreds of years, kept in slavery due to pregnancy.


Fetus is a life.. they generalize and state that it is not living. I only ask, how can one say one is pro-life if they do not support the life of something that is living?

Quote:
Pro-choice.

Nobody has the right to use a woman's body as life support if she doesn't want them to,whether they're an actual person or merely a potential person


But it forgets to state who started the life?

Quote:
Is it a better use of our medical resources to have women remain pregnant, to be made to pay for prenantal care they don't want, and to give birth to children that they will then not want to take care of? Is it better that a woman who is very high risk be made to stick out a pregnancy because others don't like the idea of her aborting? As it is, no one foots the bill for abortion other than the woman herself unless the abortion is medically necessary.


Pathos arguments have no meaning...

Quote:
I'd actually have to say that the sides is the following:

Pro-choice (Women have the right to choose)
Pro-fetus (As long as the fetus is okay and born, that's all that matters)
Pro-life (Every child a wanted child)


If they go by this logic, there are also unwanted adults. Why don't we get rid of the old people who are just using up our medical resources? As long as they live okay.. that's all that matters...

And why do these pro-choice people deserve to live? Who can determine who is wanted and unwanted? Seriously....

-----------------------------------------------------------

Anyway, if it is to be debated on privacy, it's unfortunate we really do not have a say. If the government chooses to keep abortion open to the public, I suppose there are some loop holes that must be cleared up.

First, determine completely if the Fetus should have the right of life. As seen in another thread, it's been said that if a woman was pregnant and assaulted which resulted in a miscarriage, should the assaulter have to be tried for it's life?

If the government chooses to keep abortion as an option for women, then the fetus technically should not have ANY rights at all. Destroying one should therefore not be a crime, and if in the case a pro-choice woman wants the child, and she is assaulted, there should not be prosecution upon the assaulter for the potential child regardless.

If it is determined the Fetus is human, then abortion would then require doctors to assess the situation before removing the fetus. No life for another life...

If it is determined that the fetus is only partially human... misdemeanors should be applied on women who do make the choice for an abortion. This will allow the law to prosecute those who assault women as well for the death of the fetus.

The concept is, there should be no in betweens. I've come to the point where I think there is no more hope for humanity, and the world is truly going to end soon with all the tensions among the super powers. I just feel sometimes like I've given up on life...

I just.... nevermind...
PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2005 5:11 am


Don't let them get you down. I love the pro-fetus argument. Especially when someone tells me I"m po-fetus...in case no one's seen my rather lengthy rant on the current state of adoption system, what's wrong with it, and that it needs reform. Also that we've got an obligation as human beings to do everything in our power to give the baby the best shot at life, meaning going beyond making sure he or she is born, that's why prolifers have set up many programs to help women and get their children adopted outside of the normal fostercare system to avoid abuse, I am VERY pro-quality-of-life....and it makes me laugh. I am pro-quality-of-life and pro-baby-being-born-not-killed and I don't see why the two need interfere. Research is, as you say, biased, but....not all research is solely on abortion but growing evidence to support an abortion-related issue mounts up on other studies. And we tend to be fanatics too, it's emotionally-driven reasoning, there's a need to defend this point more than something like the color red is better than the color orange or w/e, this is about life and safety and both sides are very passionate.

Women can control their own reproduction by not having sex unless they want to, and when they do, to be ready to accept the consequences. Abortion hasn't freed women, it's further objectified them. Bah. If she doesn't understand that, she's either young and ignorant or old and foolish. If I go by her logic, I shouldn't be here now, as I've had many suicidal periods and I am a bit ill and it costs a hell of a lotta money for my parents and insurance company to keep me alive...do I really matter enough to keep being a drain on society? I think so, considering once this is over I've got plans to go on and do great things in the world, maybe quietly, without my name being recognized. I want to work to reform the special education system in religious education. I want to work to improve the lives of people, I want to work to reform the adoption system, maybe I'm only a drop in a bucket but sometimes that's all it takes to add to the rest to make it spill over. I think I'm worth investing in and I think I can do a good deal for a lot of people.

Pro-choice (one out of three people involved has the right to choose and the other two have no say whatsoever)
Pro-life (every child a wanted child, every child a person before birth and in need of love and care as well as a right to live)

I have found no one in here who supports the dump, run, okay, next fetus to be saved! method.

I'm with you on humanity, but then sometimes I meet people who make me feel differently. ED draws in kids waiting to make a point. Some are good at debating and have so much talent. Others are just plain stupid and like to flame anyone who disagrees with them. I've stopped going in there. If there's one thing I hate about some humans, it's how little they care. When I come up against a choicer who has no sympathy for the men or the children lost or anyone BUT the mother, I'm saddened. Same goes when I come up against a lifer who has none for anyone but the fetus. Haven't met anyone in here like that, thank goodness. I tend to care deeply for people, all people I think, like, one thing I love about this guild is that people in here express concern for the mother's well-being and the future of the child as well, and brainstorm ways to help all parties concerned, including the parents. That's prolife. I dunno where she gets the idea prolifers are only profetus, but it's not from here. If it is....ermm....I dunno. Maybe she needs glasses and isn't reading correctly? sweatdrop

lymelady
Vice Captain


DCVI
Vice Captain

PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2005 8:34 am


From the first sentence alone, yeah they kind of are. I don't tell it to their face though. sweatdrop
PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2005 8:56 am


Lymelady, your posts seems to state that the pro-choice supporters who only care for the mother are feminazi's to the point where only the female's life is most important even if it isn't on the verge of death.

Shahada 2

650 Points
  • Gaian 50
  • Member 100

DCVI
Vice Captain

PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2005 9:42 am


Quote:
Pathos arguments have no meaning...


Congratualations! You just refuted the entire Pro-Abortion Movement blaugh
PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2005 10:09 am


kp606
Quote:
Pathos arguments have no meaning...


Congratualations! You just refuted the entire Pro-Abortion Movement blaugh


Wow really? I did? eek
xp

Shahada 2

650 Points
  • Gaian 50
  • Member 100

lymelady
Vice Captain

PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2005 10:22 am


No. I just feel that the feminazis are complete hypocrites. PLENTY of normal people only care about the mother, but they don't bug me as much as feminazis because they haven't made it their agenda to complain about women being mistreated and gone on to make the problem worse. And I've been called pro-fetus too many times when I"m pretty much....annoyingly persistant in stating the flaws in prolife arguments sweatdrop Including adoption. I don't like hypocrites. Most likely why I don't like myself.
PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:39 am


I don't believe it's hypocritical if your beliefs do not contradict yourself. Contradicting statements are usually found in many religious doctrines... which is why I define my own religion, however I feel that the only thing that is uncontradictory about the Abortion argument is that we believe the fetus in itself is a LIFE.

For me, I've come to the single mindedness that abortion should be legal, but should not be taken advantaged of in small, minimal and otherwise stupid situations... Such as... "I'm not ready for children."

I just feel that before the government should legalize abortion, it should be made clear that getting one is ethically wrong because it disregards the respect for life in itself. However, with different cultures comes different ethics, and with different ethics different beliefs, and this is probably the problem.

I guess it's safe to say... if every pro-choice fanatic was aborted before birth, there would be no unwanted children in the world....

Based off the idea that children are only unwanted because someone says they are unwanted.

Shahada 2

650 Points
  • Gaian 50
  • Member 100

lymelady
Vice Captain

PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2005 12:02 pm


I always wondered about the fairness of deciding a child is/is not wanted and will/will not have a good life before he or she's even born. We can't know. A child born to parents who want it very much and are rich and is healthy might be utterly MISERABLE. An orphan adopted and raised in not the best conditions might be extremely happy. There's no choice except for the person deciding who is wanted/will have a good life and who isn't/won't. DOn't give the child a choice, don't even give the child a chance. Bah.


I know I rant, sorry, I get upset and carried away sweatdrop
PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2005 12:09 pm


lymelady
I always wondered about the fairness of deciding a child is/is not wanted and will/will not have a good life before he or she's even born. We can't know. A child born to parents who want it very much and are rich and is healthy might be utterly MISERABLE. An orphan adopted and raised in not the best conditions might be extremely happy. There's no choice except for the person deciding who is wanted/will have a good life and who isn't/won't. DOn't give the child a choice, don't even give the child a chance. Bah.


I know I rant, sorry, I get upset and carried away sweatdrop


It's funny really because you can never tell if a child will have a good life or not. For me, I was born to a family that didn't really treat me well, I'm teased by my father and he is very immature... my mom is also caring less and less, and I'm pretty much in a position where nothing really matters anymore.

Yet, I'm still not going to have a bad life. Showing that even in adversity people can develop a will and means on their own.

Shahada 2

650 Points
  • Gaian 50
  • Member 100

lymelady
Vice Captain

PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2005 12:14 pm


I love life...even though for the past year I haven't been able to do much more than sit at home and my body keeps hurting. I'm so happy. I enjoy life so much. Made me happier, if anything, now I know how to enjoy things while I can and think positively. You can never tell.
PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2005 12:17 pm


Anyway, I'm not going to argue with facts anymore against these people. I'm only going to see how logical they are... the pro-choice on the ED.

Shahada 2

650 Points
  • Gaian 50
  • Member 100

La Veuve Zin

Rainbow Smoker

5,650 Points
  • Mega Tipsy 100
  • Forum Sophomore 300
  • Ultimate Player 200
PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2005 2:27 pm


"Like screaming at a wall" is what I just said. I'm willing to bet the reason no one agreed with my statement about preventing unwanted pregnancy is just because they don't want to agree with OMG TEH EVOL!1! anti-choicer. People like that are the ones hurting women--why grant paid maternity leave and free day care when you can just say, well, should've had an abortion, dumbass. Legalised abortion is the perfect solution for any man who didn't want to take responsibility for getting a woman pregnant.
PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2005 2:35 pm


Quote:
Pro-lifers are NOT pro-life, they are pro-fetus. And once the fetus is born, they want nothing to do with it. They did their job in their eyes. They don't want to fix the adoption system, or provide pre-natal and post-natal care to women who can't afford.


Yes I do.

pro-choicers
LALALA I'M NOT LISTENING!!!11


rolleyes

La Veuve Zin

Rainbow Smoker

5,650 Points
  • Mega Tipsy 100
  • Forum Sophomore 300
  • Ultimate Player 200

Shahada 2

650 Points
  • Gaian 50
  • Member 100
PostPosted: Mon May 02, 2005 9:43 am


I don't really see the point of intelligent debate. Anything can be argued over, and I doubt that anyone would care to argue for what's best for society on the whole rather than what's for themselves.
Reply
The Pro-life Guild

Goto Page: 1 2 3 ... 4 5 [>] [»|]
 
Manage Your Items
Other Stuff
Get GCash
Offers
Get Items
More Items
Where Everyone Hangs Out
Other Community Areas
Virtual Spaces
Fun Stuff
Gaia's Games
Mini-Games
Play with GCash
Play with Platinum