|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Tue Jun 20, 2006 9:54 pm
They disabled my sig because it was 871 BYTES over the limit
BYTES, not KiloBYTES
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 20, 2006 9:55 pm
Lame doesn't describe it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 20, 2006 9:56 pm
wow.... that makes it seem like they went out of their way to find a reason they could disable it
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 20, 2006 9:58 pm
Dampylle wow.... that makes it seem like they went out of their way to find a reason they could disable it BINGO
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 20, 2006 10:05 pm
My computer took 50 minutes longer to load because of those 871 bytes you masochistist a*****e.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 20, 2006 10:16 pm
Neo X-Death My computer took 50 minutes longer to load because of those 871 bytes you masochistist a*****e. ...and we have found the person who reported it. xd
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 20, 2006 10:17 pm
Lame, but rules are rules. sweatdrop
At least they didn't ban you for it, since technicly any violations are enough for that for you now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 20, 2006 10:33 pm
But.....I loved your siggy... crying
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 20, 2006 11:19 pm
NiGHTS Chao589 They disabled my sig because it was 871 BYTES over the limit BYTES, not KiloBYTES Wow NiGHTS... thats just petty. I feel your pain.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 20, 2006 11:26 pm
Ouch. Poor neko-chan.... You'll be replacing it soon though, right?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 20, 2006 11:29 pm
Safe to say that if they pull this on me, I got them in a corner.
Sig width: 499px
Sig Hieght: 304 px
Sig Filesize: 76.73 kb
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 20, 2006 11:32 pm
The Eternal Safe to say that if they pull this on me, I got them in a corner. Sig width: 499px Sig Hieght: 304 px Sig Filesize: 76.73 kb SAFE! THere is no safe...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 20, 2006 11:35 pm
It really sucks that This guy has had the same oversized sig since he started on gaia. Never changed it, never had it removed. Maybe if it had a half naked girl on it, it'd be removed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 20, 2006 11:41 pm
Veras Gunn It really sucks that This guy has had the same oversized sig since he started on gaia. Never changed it, never had it removed. Maybe if it had a half naked girl on it, it'd be removed. Where's the sig?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 21, 2006 1:45 am
Mods arn't as nazi here as I've seen on other forums where they're the ******** Gustappo where you could only have a 100x100 sig INCLUDING TEXT, giving the cliche excuse that it takes bandwidth.
Just cut the sig now by a few pixels on the X/Y axis and it should be good...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
