|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Fri Jun 02, 2006 8:11 pm
I know this question is so random but I'd like to see what people think XD
I'd imagine it'd look like a beaten up cardboard box with maybe two eyeholes.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 02, 2006 8:37 pm
 Male Female That's what I imagine.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 03, 2006 8:52 pm
I imagin' it as a regular hat like this.
But with the same raggedy coating. XD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2006 3:51 pm
It would most likely look like a beanie hat, with a lot of holes in it. smile
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 4:17 pm
Probably something like the hat im wearing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 21, 2006 12:13 pm
Skorri Siggeir Probably something like the hat im wearing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2006 12:28 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 04, 2006 2:08 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 05, 2006 10:56 pm
Wow, you make a compelling point.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 3:07 pm
Truthfully, baseball caps can be pretteh expensive xD I myself plan on getting one of the puffy hat's, they're peasant-ish enough even if they're not tattered. Beret's would work well too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 3:30 pm
Ishrehn Truthfully, baseball caps can be pretteh expensive xD I myself plan on getting one of the puffy hat's, they're peasant-ish enough even if they're not tattered. Beret's would work well too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Sep 16, 2006 3:23 pm
I'd imagine they'd be quite like ratty old top hat, which would be quite exciting love. =D
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2006 9:27 am
A ratty tatty old beret! There can be a bunch of patches in it!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Sep 28, 2006 4:28 am
Probably a ratty version of the hat I'm wearing, without the feather.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 16, 2006 9:51 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
