Collusion with the media in general - Smearing peopleIt's well known that the democratic party has had a fairly heavy collusion with the media for years. Be it hollywood or the news, it is not that disputed that the democrats and liberals more or less have a stranglehold on most of the media outlets where people receive their information ,and thus their message can be much more repeatedly drilled in to the mind of the public. This is not something that is absent from the right, with Ronald Reagan the actor becoming president and celebrities generally being involved in influencing politics, but it is unfortunately more common by the left. The left has an absolute stranglehold over the media, which gives them control over nearly all of the information the average person consumes, and thus the information people use in the political process. When considering virtually all major media outlets, only 7% of the journalists identify as Republicans. [
1][
2][
3] 65% identified as liberal, while only 15% identified as conservative, with the vast majority being left-leaning. While concerning that roughly 80-90% of the media reports in the favor of the Democratic party, as does most of hollywood, allowing them a stranglehold over public perception, it is not by itself evidence of wrong-doing, only evidence of their absolute control and utter domination over all forms of public information. People get most of their information about the world from the news, and it overwhelmingly has a deliberately engineered liberal or left-wing bias. Concerning, yes, illegal or immoral, not necessarily. What it does mean is that when something happens in the media, it can almost always be traced back to the democrats or other left-leaning organizations in the rest of the world, who specifically control the news.
Cases of wrong doing include
leaking questions to public debates to candidates beforehand, and
receiving rough-drafts to articles about their own hand before. The liberal bias is often obfuscated, and left-wing individuals claiming to be objective and unbiased tend to favor democrats more, and Republicans less, as well as any left-wing individual in the rest of the world. The Democratic campaign for presidency and Hillary in particular received numerous rough drafts on their own candidates to engineer them to their own liking, and were able to submit smear pieces that would be circulated by major news outlets, and therefore virtually all of the media. They receive questions to debate before hand to make their side look more intelligent or coherent with well orchestrated responses, and they create hit pieces on their enemies to make them look bad, engineering the public view by controlling over 90% of the media. All of this was presented as if it was unbiased fact, when in reality it was all done on purpose with collusion with the major media outlets and politicians, which actually has proven to in many cases be illegal, and in many other cases simply be immoral underhanded tactics. Most of the smear campaigns, against police, the military, and their other political opponents, be it Donald Trump or the Republicans calling them all racist bigots, was engineered specifically by the Democrats, and other left-wing individuals.
By far, their worse tactic is either censorship of anyone they dislike by various means, notably social media, or essentially libel, cases where they make up and defame another person in an attempt to get mobs of angry people to go after them. This can include losing their job and livelihoods, or even real world violence. While one might ask for the moral and perhaps even legal culpability of someone simply calling someone else a nazi or claiming they are some other evil, there are established moral and legal precedence for this being immoral. Libel, that is, destroying someone's reputation by spreading false rumors about them, is illegal. Especially when a major organization uses it's power and influence to go after someone and that information is patently untrue, and especially when those falsehoods result in real losses, the information being spread is no longer protected by speech by is instead, illegal.
Pewdiepie,
Jontron,
Philip De Franco,
Sargon of Akkad and numerous other youtubers as well as youtube itself has recently come under a wave of such attacks, erroneously declaring these individuals "nazis" "alt-right" and "far right" supporters, the implication being that the alt-right are modern neo-nazis or white nationalists, and thus falsley accusing them of racism. This has resulted in monetary losses in many cases, pewdiepie falsely being Various journalists such as
Dave Rubin,
Tim pool and
Milo Yiannapolus among others have been slandered by the media, which given their jobset in the public light, specifically hinders their ability to work at their jobs and in many cases have resulted in real, monetary losses and even times violent threats against their lives. [
1][
2] This is all behind the numerous wave of death threats, assaults and even attempted acts of violence on these people, all of which has been engineered by the media to take down what they perceive to be their competition which yes, includes a wide variety of other liberals. It's akin to falsely outing someone as a communist during the 60's; you might not only lose your job, but face an angry, violent mob, which endangers people.
Recently youtube itself, perhaps the largest social media website on the planet, was poised to lose 750 million to a billion dollars in advertising revenue due to a single story against them [
1][
2], making these media outlets directly culpable for the financial losses promoted by spreading lies about the organization, in addition the backlash of hate they have received. This of course, is by a media that is overwhelmingly liberal, and receives substantial funding and support by the democrats and other left-wing individuals. The entire youtube smear campaign was all engineered by a handful of democrat journalists, connected to the DNC, and
Eric Feinberg who specifically stated his goal was to get youtube to accept his new algorithm, of which he holds the patent on, which is the only algorithm that could possibly allow youtube to quickly catch any of these supposed and so-called hate speech individuals. The spoken intent is to force youtube to adopt only highly specific left-wing views and to censor or demonetize anyone that does not promote these views, and even some people who do but are not a part of the in group. It's notable that exceptions apply to groups like CNN or the young turks, which can show beheading videos by ISIS, but videos with the word "ISIS" in them from non-left wing groups are often demonetized immediately. Of course, censoring and controlling all of the media is a hideous tactic as they attempt to snuff out anything that's even vaguely independent from the establishment media, but it also often amounts to libel in many cases as they continue to smear otherwise innocent people, who not only lose their reputations, but potentially their jobs and even their lives.
Doxing is also another tactic, revealing the person's home address and other personal information so they may be more easily attacked. Immoral and in many cases illegal, revealing personal information about a person to the public, especially when that person faces intense public scrutiny (such as when called a nazi or alt-right member) is just as bad as libel. These individuals are morally culpable for any harm these people receive by publishing their address, and even worse they often make up lies about their victims to promote hatred and attacks against them. Akin to "fake doxing", these media groups basically reveal a person's real name and other personal details about them and then combine it with a litany of fake information intended to smear that person's name. That fake information often includes allegations of racism, being a neo-nazi, an alt-right member, a bigot or some kind of committing other supposed evils, or the manipulation of their statements to appear more evil than they really are. This is not only immoral for the damage it causes to these people's reputation, the rejection by their family members who believe they are nazis, opening them up to harassment on the street by people who now hate them, and the loss in revenue which can result in millions, but also true, violent attacks. Notable examples include X, all of which was engineered by those on the left. And if you believe the media acted alone in this, it has already been well established who is in control of these media organizations, I.E. the democratic party and other left-wing organizations, and their specific intent to hurt otherwise innocent people. It's not just a coincidence that these organizations are all at the same time producing hundreds of stories to attack people,
and it all just so happens to work in the favor of the democrats by allowing them to take down their enemies.
By itself it shows a damning trail of corruption between high ranking government officials and the media which is used like their own lie-making machines, pumping out political propaganda for their side while bashing anyone who dare oppose them. Akin to doxing or actual doxing in cases, moral culpability actually still lies in the hands of those spreading libel and lies about individuals in hopes some form of retaliation, be it by losing their jobs and livelihood, real world violence or otherwise. This overwhelmingly liberal bias gives the democratic party absolute domination over the public narrative, and allows them to convince otherwise normal people of their more extreme views, giving them a broad spectrum of people to follow through with their intended plans. When falsely accusing individuals of being neo-nazis, racists and other evils, they not only are independent journalists, but democrats and liberals acting in concert to take their enemies down. Due the violent mobs that have been showing up to riots increasingly over political issues, one would *have to know* that a smear piece like this could lead to violence against the individual among other repercussions. However, there's also a trail of violence that can be directly connected to the DNC, where protesters paid by high ranking democrats, have consistently and repeatedly committed acts of violence, even at times against specific targets. The overall aim seems to be to violently take out their enemies, and use the resulting intimidation with enough real acts of violence to back it up, to achieve their political goals. An overwhelming barrage of death threats, backed up by a handful of real acts of violence to intimidate people to do what they want, with a slowly escalating pattern of violence to continue to turn up the heat as the intimidation needs to become more severe.
Encouraging and inciting ViolenceObviously, unless they Democrats took part in the violence themselves or paid someone to do so, they cannot directly be implicated as being at fault for the violence we are seeing. The fault always rests with the criminal, and their own choices. But given the political climate that has been generated, the acceptance and normalization of violence by the media, increases in political violence is bound to be inevitable. Like poverty or urbanization, neither of these specifically lead to violence, but it does create an environment where violence is more likely to occur. And when an individual specifically engineers a political environment to be violent, they are partially morally culpable for the ensuing violence that occurs. Be it by doxing someone and releasing their personal information to the internet so anyone can know where this person lives and attack them, smearing their name so people will attack them, or flat-out encouraging political violence against their enemies, the media pattern of the normalization of political violence is in part to blame for the recent upswing in attacks we are seeing. The media of course overwhelmingly being left-wing, and overwhelmingly under the direct control of the democrats. While of lesser importance, when the media endorses violence against political candidates, their scope and reach influences people, and that influence as well can lead to violence. The democrats, in my mind, are still somewhat morally and in some cases legally culpable if they call for or defend violence, even it they don't participate in it themselves.
Blatant endorsements of violence come from various left-wing media outlets with clear ties to the democratic party, Blatant endorsements have also come from celebrities, many of them which have proven ties to the Hillary campaign and the democratic party, endorsing the democrats during the election. These include
Committing actual acts of ViolenceIt's difficult to connect this 7th floor group and Hillary Clinton with actual acts of violence or malice beyond what they've been officially investigated for. But it's not as difficult to prove that members within the group acted in accordance with other groups and committed other crimes, including acts of violence. This would prove, at the very least, that many of these groups have links to other criminal entities and that the relative secrecy and loyalty each member of the group, has to the group, is extremely dangerous not only to the specific individuals they target, but our democracy as a whole. One would basically need to prove that these Democratic party has not only acted corruptly for many years, but is directly responsible, from the top down, for political violence in the country. One would need to prove that high ranking democrats not only knew about the violence happening or encouraged it, but specifically engineered violent attacks against opposing sides, through multiple forms of coordination. The basic pattern of behavior has been to stir up controversy over manufactured hysteria, by falsely accusing the other side of some wrong doing. This can be false allegations of being a neo-nazi, alt-right member, or racist, and often includes framing the other individual as a bigot. Because we know that the democrat party is connected with the media and is telling the media what to say, we know for a fact that many of the most inflammatory stories came from them. And because we know those false allegations lead to real world violence against them, we know that the democrats were directly responsible for the mass hysteria generated by the media that lead to these events. But, much like the assassination of the Roman Ceaser, the collusion doesn't end there. The DNC not only reliably could orchestrate riots against individuals they didn't like (which often includes other democrats and liberals), but also paid protesters to commit violent acts, using the riot as a cover to conceal their actions. The simple pattern of behavior is to drum up mass hysteria, then insert their own paid protesters in the group to guide the riots towards specific individuals or directly assault individuals themselves in order to achieve their goals, using the riots as a cover to disguise their violent political attacks. So not only do we have proof of the democrats engineering mass hysteria, like yelling fire in a theater or that there is a bomb on a plane, in order to get an angry mob to attack people they didn't like, but we've also got direct evidence of paid rioters, essentially thugs for hires, attacking people at the behest of the democratic party.
Such a tall claim deserves and demands evidence, given the severity of the accusation of violence and the legal issues that follow. One of the most damning pieces of evidence comes from Project Vertias, who recorded high-ranking DNC staffers including Scott Foval and Robert Creamer [
1][
2][
3], individuals who reported directly to the Hillary campaigning, planning and orchestrating violent political attacks on the right. On October 18, 2016, O'Keefe released a series of videos on Project Veritas' YouTube channel titled "Rigging the Election" that he alleges show former national field director Scott Foval of Americans United for Change discussing planting agitators, including "mentally ill people that we pay to do s**t” in front of Donald Trump rallies to ask questions near reporters, a common practice known as "bird dogging". Scott Foval was fired by Americans United for Change after the first video was released. Later videos would prove their involvement in subsequent violent demonstrations, such as in protests and in hiring "mentally ill people" to attack Trump supporters in order to scare and intimidate them.
There is also a long list of pay-outs from the DNC, other democratic organizations and democratic donors to organizations which have been involved in violent riots in the U.S., rioters aimed at progressing democratic political views. This includes groups like Anti-fa, OBS, MORE and others, all of which have recieved payments from th DNC. Other than the political environment they've created in the media which fosters violence,
When the media falsely accuses Pewdiepie, Jontron, Dave Rubin, Tim pool and Milo of being alt-right neo-nazis, and accuse anyone of being a nazi for drinking milk, using the okay-sign or reposting memes about pepe the frog (like Hillary clinton did), they don't only smear their reputations, but open them up for attacks of violence. In the words of Tim Pool, one such liberal journalist smeared "Basically if you don't support the mainstream narrative, if you question the mainstream narrative, you are alt-right. And that's dangerous, especially when you've got guys dressing in all black and going around bashing people in the skull, and now a guy going out with a rifle and shooting some politicians". As if it wasn't dangerous enough in this chaotic political environment which can lead to riots over the drop of the at, they also deliberately pay individuals to attack people they deem to be nazis, using the simple labels as means to justify it to their clients. It wouldn't surprise you that Trump and many other politicians have been called a fascist by these same organizations, and accused of every form of evil under the sun, from racism to fascism, and thus violence has been encouraged against them as well. Not only by the media, but those in control of the media, a select "cabal" or shadow organization within the DNC, as determined by the U.S. government. Who can release the hounds on anyone who stands against their message. The rise of an extra judicial force of power has been the hallmark of dictators for centuries, be it "Hitler's Bodyguard" which later gained more than a million soldiers and took over the country by assassinating their enemies of the soviet guard in Russia which later formed the foundation of the secret police. While we clearly are not in that state as of yet, the fear of these hired thugs working for the bidding of their political party outside the government is troublesome, and could be an indication of something much worse, if we don't act to stop it now.
In conclusionSo, all of this leads to a fairly simple conclusion, that that a deeply corrupt democratic sub-group within the DNC stir up controversy in the media, create media hype to smear certain individuals, and then rely on the chaos to disguise paid actors to violently assault specific individuals. They not only encourage, endorse and promote violence, but pay people to do it, and have even admitted to this many times. The assistance of such a shadow government is well known by the FBI and DOJ, and present within the DNC, the media and even supposedly "fringe" groups that receive huge amounts of funding from the DNC. These individuals not only go after the right and conservatives, but also fellow liberals they see as competition, such as Bernie Sanders, and are intent to achieve total domination over the media, social platforms, the government and our society. This is concerning not only be removing the balance of powers, but also due to their deep corruption, self serving ways and even their use of violence to achieve their political goals. This organization is currently escalating it's attacks on people and upping their violence after suffering a crushing defeat by the Republicans, and it more than likely they will retaliate soon enough against their perceived enemies which is most of the American people, with numerous riots, attempted political assassinations and other attacks already taking place, notably with greater frequency.
Ultimately my job is to portray the facts as I see them, and all of this paints a worrisome picture regardless of a group of individuals being in control or at the center of all of it. In the end, it's up to you to decide and determine what you believe for yourself, but hopefully the facts speak for themselves. This pattern of behavior, even if only for the most part reckless instead of a deliberate attack, is still indicative of a very dangerous trend that could cause the U.S. and many other countries to spiral down the path of extreme political violence, which has resulted in the most catastrophic wars in history.
1. There are a corrupt group of individuals within the U.S. government and the democratic party
2. These same groups are working with other countries and corporations to attack any organization that does not promote their views, violently or otherwise
3. There is a clear connection between various media outlets and the democratic party, pushing a political environment that encourages violence, making them partially morally culpable
4. They not only encourage political violence by creating an incredibly hostile political environment and promote acts of violence directly,but they also hire people to be violent towards their opposing political enemies
5. They continuously engage in libelous activities, doxing people and other illegal or immoral acts to attack people they dislike, and deliberately drum up mass hysteria to get mobs of angry people to attack their enemies.
6. This is a plot overwhelmingly dominated by the Democrats, of which specific high-ranking democrats are attacking other democrats, and conservatives that don't share their extremely specific and extreme views
Reply
