Welcome to Gaia! ::

Reply The Gathering
Whats Your Favorite Translation of the Bible?

Quick Reply

Enter both words below, separated by a space:

Can't read the text? Click here

Submit

Nenanah

Fashionable Guildswoman

25,825 Points
  • Married 100
  • Perfect Attendance 400
  • Brilliant Light 450
PostPosted: Thu Nov 07, 2013 9:29 pm


Just curious.

Mine is the King James version, its pretty accurate and it's the easiest for me to understand.
I also like the New Living Translation cause it's also fairly easy to understand.

Then I like the older versions of King James cause the old English looks fancy and when I read it I feel proper. I dunno XD It just looks neat.
PostPosted: Sun Nov 10, 2013 5:02 pm


I love the English Standard Version. It's considered one of the most accurate translations plus it's easy to read. I used to have trouble with the KJV and even NKJV, with the thees and thous and such. I felt a bit like I was struggling through a Shakespeare play with ye olde English. whee Takes me longer to digest the words, haha.

Aularen has quit


CapCrack

PostPosted: Tue Nov 12, 2013 5:25 pm


The hipster Christian in me loves the ESV(I own a daily reading ESV and study bible). I do own a KJV and an NIV study bible.

I want an NRSV (Catholic version) so I can have the apocrypha as well.
PostPosted: Wed Dec 11, 2013 2:19 am


South Polar Eclipse
Just curious.

Mine is the King James version, its pretty accurate and it's the easiest for me to understand.
I also like the New Living Translation cause it's also fairly easy to understand.

Then I like the older versions of King James cause the old English looks fancy and when I read it I feel proper. I dunno XD It just looks neat.


surprised Wooow! For me, KJV's the hardest to understand. My favorite translation is NLT. The Message's good too. smile

Divine Crystal Maiden

Blessed Noob


Nocturoe Nara

PostPosted: Tue Jul 01, 2014 10:56 pm


I really do not have an 'overall favorite'. Each translation, (and transliteration such as TM and NLV), of scripture all have a purpose for me when I am studying.

My favorite for just a nice read through and less confusion in semantics/linguistics without losing its meaning is the ESV. The ESV helps me understand it as a whole. My writing is similar in style as to how the ESV is written.

My favorite for studying in a choppy format are NIV and KJV side by side. Some meanings are lost in NIV and so I use the KJV to help me understand the deeper meanings and I use NIV to dumb down the old English when I get confused. I am a huge fan of the NKJV but it isn't quite the same as the classic KJV.

I also use the NLV and TM for anything I want to apply to my life for they paraphrase things and give the gist of a scripture. Of course, I always cross reference. Especially for children's Bible studies, I will usually read out of the ESV or NKJV and then explain it through the NLV and TM.

Of course, I love commentaries with pictures, I learn so much more from the culture of their day. It helps you understand phrases as weird as Solomon 'complimenting his bride' "Your teeth are like a herd of sheep!"
And more importantly;
when Jesus says

Matthew 27:46
" My God, my God why have you forsaken me! "

People used to preach (and still do) that God cannot look upon sin. So Jesus was not to be looked upon until he died.

KJV inspired me to research more, there was more to this. God can look upon sin, he is perfect, besides, he has done it in scripture. We can not look upon him due to our sinfulness. We can not until we are saved

.
This (no surprise here) was a reference to Psalm 22:1 which all scribes and pharisees memorized just like little kid songs in church! This phrase Jesus said on the cross was to say "Look! Your own King David prophesied about my day!"

I would never have found this out without cross referencing scriptures and having a passion to find out more than the basic answer which is entirely incorrect.

I find it important to read as many different scriptures as possible and always dig for more truth.
PostPosted: Wed Jul 23, 2014 8:54 pm


I like my Ignatius Catholic Study Bible. It's the most literally accurate translation of the bible to English, and I don't have to worry that someone took parts out for their own political ends. It's all there.

brother_edward

Quotable Conversationalist

5,750 Points
  • Forum Dabbler 200
  • Alchemy Level 1 100
  • Contributor 150

Garland-Green

Friendly Gaian

PostPosted: Sun Jul 27, 2014 7:34 am


Don't worry people, "protestant" Bibles have what books needs to be in them. The only reason why things were removed was because it was not canon - it was only after the council of Trent (1545 and 1563) that is was decided to be deuterocanonical - meaning 'belonging to the second canon', before that they were not considered inspired. What happened was that it added a lot of conflicting uninspired doctrine into the word of God, though the early Christians knew about these books they were never treated with such reverence as the other 66 books.

I enjoy reading and listening to The King James Bible, because of its poetic language. It is not only the word of God, it is art. It in its language also have a sort of majesty to it.
PostPosted: Sun Jul 27, 2014 7:33 pm


Garland-Green
Don't worry people, "protestant" Bibles have what books needs to be in them. The only reason why things were removed was because it was not canon - it was only after the council of Trent (1545 and 1563) that is was decided to be deuterocanonical - meaning 'belonging to the second canon', before that they were not considered inspired. What happened was that it added a lot of conflicting uninspired doctrine into the word of God, though the early Christians knew about these books they were never treated with such reverence as the other 66 books.

I enjoy reading and listening to The King James Bible, because of its poetic language. It is not only the word of God, it is art. It in its language also have a sort of majesty to it.


If you have an incomplete bible, you have an incomplete bible. How can you say having a book lacking the inspired word of God "have what books need to be in them"? If you believe that the Bible is the inspired word of God, and you claim Sola Scriptura, having a complete Bible would be even more vital.

I'd like a source, please, on the rest of your claim. The Church was using the same scripture as the Jews at the founding of The Church, which contained a complete Old Testament and was known as the Septuagint. Early Christian Writers, notably Saint Augustine, wrote extensively on the subject. Books which were not considered the Inspired Word of God were not included in bibles. To state otherwise is not only false, it's heresy and calls into question the validity of ALL scripture.

brother_edward

Quotable Conversationalist

5,750 Points
  • Forum Dabbler 200
  • Alchemy Level 1 100
  • Contributor 150

Garland-Green

Friendly Gaian

PostPosted: Mon Jul 28, 2014 3:13 am


Nenanah

Hey Nenanah, is it ok for me and edward to take this discussion in here,
or is it diverging from what you had intended the thread to be about?
Reply
The Gathering

 
Manage Your Items
Other Stuff
Get GCash
Offers
Get Items
More Items
Where Everyone Hangs Out
Other Community Areas
Virtual Spaces
Fun Stuff
Gaia's Games
Mini-Games
Play with GCash
Play with Platinum