Welcome to Gaia! ::

i'll look into it

yes i think the facebook page is the "free illuminism" page its interesting how you say that the skull and crossbones is a masonic insignia, as they say on their website, [or they at least would have us believe] that the freemasons were originally one of their ideas but the elites took over their idea or something, and apparently the freemasonic order are their "enemies" now so why would they use the insignia of their "enemies"?

if this website is so important to them and if enlightenment is so very important if illuminism is the absolute alpha and omega then why was this not one of the first websites to appear on the internet? apparently this site has only been around since 2010.

they have a questions and answers section on their website and one of the questions was asking about illuminati symbolism in music videos as well as asking why the videos are so sexualized a lot of the time, the reply was something like "well dont you think that christianity is even more evil and satanic?" of course they are welcome to their veiws about religion but the point is they did not answer that question they completely ignored the question.

i have not yet looked at every single page on the website [but i plan to] but if what you said is true about all of it being just a recruitment drive then why isnt there anywere to donate money? and as far as i can tell there is no instructions as to how to get "recruited"

You make good points, but at the bottom of the page there is a link that says "join us now" or something to that affect no? o.o
and they would have you believe they are "enemies" of masons -.- they spread misinformation, pay people to spread it as well.
and no it wouldn't be a top website if it was just a simple site one of many of thousands of sites to spread the idea and influence those of weak minds, they would just have many sites to give people false hope of feeling it's real. To be honest, I don't know.
look here though lol. http://www.gaiaonline.com/guilds/viewtopic.php?t=24071169

what are their recruitment meetings like? and could you post any links to websites that genuinely represent the illuminati? [if their even on the internet]

I took a look at the main page and a few other sections of the websites and my analysis is that it seems small and basic.

First off, the site does not seem to have a lot of work put in to it. I have gone through the basics of web design, mostly with a program called Dreamweaver, and the layout of the sight seems way too simple. The picture on the top seems like an obvious imagine plug without any alterations or effects to spazz it up. Sections linking to other parts of the website, the forum selection to the left side,also seems like a default webpage layout that you can select in Dreamweaver. ( Simple page links made into a list of boxes on the side of the page. )
This isn't a big deal, but because the website seems so simple without much work put into it, I doubt the group behind it is big or has ulterior motives.

Secondly, the website seems...very biased. Whoever has written the sections seems strict and critical on his/her beliefs and opinionated themselves quite often in their writing. It's ok to be strong in a belief, but being so strong as to not even go into understandings of other perspectives or giving lack of sources to their information seems very silly.


The website itself seems very preachy. Looking at it, it seems like a bunch of people are fed up with, from what I'm guessing, how America is today. So, they want to propose their own form of "New World Order". One they believe that would be right for everyone's future. However, I'm not finding anywhere that proves the claims or discusses in EXTREME and unbiased detail about the topics they bring up.
I love conspiracies but only when they have a backbone and can be rational. The popular belief of this NWO and how everything is terrible never seems to stem down to, atleast to the majority, that "America is s**t",

Countries/societies throughout history were never 'perfect' and can be better or worse in comparison to others. America's population is pretty big and free when it comes to the ideals of the public but has many flawed systems such as the current political system for deciding the head of the state and healthcare.
When you have a room of comfortable, free thinkers, some of them are going to hate their environment and will usually, stemming from boredom or paranoia, will find those reasons they dislike about it.
" These walls are too white. "
" The lighting in here is terrible. "
" The chairs are uncomfortable. "
Find enough reasons and the people who designed the room become vilified and revolted against, picket signs and protests everywhere to change the room.


My point is...our current world is kinda crappy. In ways where countries are literal cemeteries to countries like ours where the land has money running through its veins. As so, there are problems but probably not as dramatized as some like to think of it. No group of people looking to overthrow the population for total control. Just some guys in suits who want to keep their really nice house and expensive car.

Don't get me wrong. I didn't want to seem as though I was highly focused on the design of the website. The reason I was criticizing the design of the website was to say that an organization or some higher power couldn't have designed it. It was more as a form to talk about how whoever ran the website was probably normal, ordinary people that believed in conspiracies.

My biggest concern with the website is how it is biased. The website takes one stances and runs that train as far as they can type it without speaking more into other sides of the topics they bring it.
When it comes to what they believe, they go into detail and try to articulate the ideas to make other people understand. Anything else is bashed and automatically treated with derision in a harsh manner.

I'm not even trying to point out if the content is correct or not. That's of a completely different point. Their content can be whatever they want it to be. I just wanted to say that the site doesn't seem to portray their thoughts well. Atleast in an appealing way, but I guess that's just me being picky.

I guess my main point is that I have a hard time trying to trust the site as it makes me question what voice of reason they stand for. Everyone can be the voice of reason but not always the same way. I feel as though their content is tainted by their close-minded, one-train thought being viewed as "This is how things are and there isn't any butts about it".

As for the anonymous attack, I find that highly odd. I never really approved nor disliked anonymous. I do like their stance on the right to the freedom of speech and information but that's about it. Why Anonymous would want to attack a site and therefor limit information is beyond me. If I had to guess, some MEMBERS of anonymous saw the site as, as I would presume, information that is incorrect/unimportant that would only supply people of the internet the wrong idea of what to that. (False information) That's the thing about anonymous. Sometimes, anonymous has people that split up and do their own things. It's not always a collective decision. Hell, the site probably just got attacked by hackers and the people who run that website probably just assumed it was anonymous. After all, everyone who is a hacker these days is automatically assumed to be with anonymous.

Thus is the big issue in trusting the site's information if they don't have any support to back up their claims. I don't really like information that goes around the idea " Well we think it was like this "