|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Fri Aug 09, 2013 8:12 pm
Reading up on the different personality types and how they interact with each other, I believe I've run into a problem.
The most entertaining people to argue with are apparently ENTJ's, and the lack of knowing any of them to my knowledge is hindering my ability to argue with people for no good reason.
Plus I find it to be hands down the most desirable personality type, considering it's highly logical and it gets s**t done instead of sitting around thinking about s**t.
Needz some logic hammas tae fly 'bout.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 09, 2013 8:48 pm
ISTJs are the coolest, though cool
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 09, 2013 8:55 pm
Little Miss Fortune ISTJs are the coolest, though cool I wuddn't get along wiv an S do. Intuition is just more intuitive.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 09, 2013 9:01 pm
Divine_Malevolence Little Miss Fortune ISTJs are the coolest, though cool I wuddn't get along wiv an S do. Intuition is just more intuitive.
"Individuals who prefer sensing are more likely to trust information that is in the present, tangible, and concrete: that is, information that can be understood by the five senses. They tend to distrust hunches, which seem to come 'out of nowhere.' They prefer to look for details and facts. For them, the meaning is in the data." Data doesn't lie <.<
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 10, 2013 1:53 am
Little Miss Fortune ISTJs are the coolest, though cool hell yeah emotion_brofist
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 10, 2013 2:15 am
•○♣☼♣○•
Pretty sure there was a thread about the personality types before... I'm recalling ponies.
•○♣☼♣○•
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 10, 2013 8:02 am
Little Miss Fortune Divine_Malevolence Little Miss Fortune ISTJs are the coolest, though cool I wuddn't get along wiv an S do. Intuition is just more intuitive.
"Individuals who prefer sensing are more likely to trust information that is in the present, tangible, and concrete: that is, information that can be understood by the five senses. They tend to distrust hunches, which seem to come 'out of nowhere.' They prefer to look for details and facts. For them, the meaning is in the data." Data doesn't lie <.<Data does lie, though. I've seen enough of it to tell you this is a fact, you don't trust your results until you can replicate them. Believe half of what you see'n none of what you hear. Find the reason behind an event, and no matter how confusing the pieces seemed before, they'll mesh together perfectly after. Seeing a few trees is all well'n good, but you won't get anywhere until you notice the forest.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 10, 2013 8:52 am
Yeah I've never met one of those either. I took a quiz and found out I'm an INFP though the one I took had no exact middle button. I mean come on, some of those I neither agree or disagree.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 11, 2013 4:12 am
epic-writer42 Yeah I've never met one of those either. I took a quiz and found out I'm an INFP though the one I took had no exact middle button. I mean come on, some of those I neither agree or disagree. I guess it also depend on what they're asking: "Which option is correct for you" or "which option is the most appropriate for you". 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 11, 2013 7:49 am
Gakre epic-writer42 Yeah I've never met one of those either. I took a quiz and found out I'm an INFP though the one I took had no exact middle button. I mean come on, some of those I neither agree or disagree. I guess it also depend on what they're asking: "Which option is correct for you" or "which option is the most appropriate for you". Which is sometimes neither or.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 11, 2013 5:02 pm
Maybe it's actually rare to get ENTJ's to sit down and argue when they could be curbstomping your face in instead?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 11, 2013 5:47 pm
Myrielle Maybe it's actually rare to get ENTJ's to sit down and argue when they could be curbstomping your face in instead? That doesn't sound like a rational course of action.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 11, 2013 5:53 pm
Divine_Malevolence Myrielle Maybe it's actually rare to get ENTJ's to sit down and argue when they could be curbstomping your face in instead? That doesn't sound like a rational course of action. Rational choice between sitting and talking about feelings vs acting on them. lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 11, 2013 7:03 pm
Myrielle Divine_Malevolence Myrielle Maybe it's actually rare to get ENTJ's to sit down and argue when they could be curbstomping your face in instead? That doesn't sound like a rational course of action. Rational choice between sitting and talking about feelings vs acting on them. lol We ain't talkin' 'bout ENFJ's, do. ENTJ's don't have feelings to talk about.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 11, 2013 7:25 pm
Divine_Malevolence Myrielle Divine_Malevolence Myrielle Maybe it's actually rare to get ENTJ's to sit down and argue when they could be curbstomping your face in instead? That doesn't sound like a rational course of action. Rational choice between sitting and talking about feelings vs acting on them. lol We ain't talkin' 'bout ENFJ's, do. ENTJ's don't have feelings to talk about. That's why it's just logical for them to curbstomp you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
