|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 08, 2006 7:28 pm
S.D. Governor Signs Abortion Ban Into Law
By CHET BROKAW, Associated Press Writer Mon Mar 6, 3:43 PM ET
PIERRE, S.D. - Gov. Mike Rounds signed legislation Monday banning nearly all abortions in South Dakota, setting up a court fight aimed at challenging the 1973 U.S. Supreme Court decision that legalized abortion.
The bill would make it a crime for doctors to perform an abortion unless the procedure was necessary to save the woman's life. It would make no exception for cases of rape or incest.
Planned Parenthood, which operates the state's only abortion clinic, in Sioux Falls, has pledged to challenge the measure.
Rounds issued a written statement saying he expects the law will be tied up in court for years and will not take effect unless the U.S. Supreme Court upholds it.
"In the history of the world, the true test of a civilization is how well people treat the most vulnerable and most helpless in their society. The sponsors and supporters of this bill believe that abortion is wrong because unborn children are the most vulnerable and most helpless persons in our society. I agree with them," Rounds said in the statement.
The governor declined all media requests for interviews Monday.
The Legislature passed the bill last month after supporters argued that the recent appointment of conservative justices John Roberts and Samuel Alito have made the U.S. Supreme Court more likely to overturn Roe v. Wade.
Abortion opponents already are offering money to help the state pay legal bills for the anticipated court challenge, Rounds has said. Lawmakers said an anonymous donor has pledged $1 million to defend the ban, and the Legislature set up a special account to accept donations for legal fees.
Under the new law, to go into effect July 1, doctors could get up to five years in prison for performing an illegal abortion.
Rounds noted that it was written to make sure existing restrictions would still be enforced during the legal battle. Current state law sets increasingly stringent restrictions on abortions as pregnancy progresses; after the 24th week, the procedure is allowed only to protect the woman's health and safety.
Kate Looby, state director of Planned Parenthood, said the organization has not yet decided whether to challenge the measure in court or to seek a statewide public vote in November. A referendum would either repeal the abortion ban or delay a court challenge to the legislation.
"Obviously, we're very disappointed that Governor Rounds has sided on the side of politics rather than on the side of the women of South Dakota to protect their health and safety," Looby said.
She said Planned Parenthood would continue providing services that include family planning, emergency contraception and safe and legal abortions.
About 800 abortions are performed each year in the state.
- Source
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 08, 2006 7:46 pm
Hopefuly the people theri will stop being ignornat and start being humans.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:06 pm
This sounds extremely immature, but, I really, really want to squeal. xd
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 08, 2006 9:17 pm
So wait.
How is Planned Parenthood going to keep doing safe and legal abortions if abortion is illegal?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:14 pm
I'm a little surprised with this.
I mean I know it's a victory for us but little 'ole realistic me...I thought we'd see abortion be made illegal after years of placing restrictions on it and reforming other things so that women can live without it...a weaning process if you will. I never expected a state to try and go cold turkey.
Then again...maybe S.D. is better prepared to go cold turkey than New Jersey is. That's not really saying much though...
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 08, 2006 11:49 pm
I keep hearing the pro-choicers talking about if they overturn RvW that it will be a state issue. But if they overturn it, wouldn't that make it illegal by Supreme Court rule?
Meaning it is the law of the land.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 3:30 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 3:59 am
hey, i notice something- in pretty much every article i read, i see "abortion opponents" compared to "pro choice"... it makes us sound like we're guerilla fighters trying to destroy such a sacred right as to kill one's own child.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 4:53 am
Master Kaiser I keep hearing the pro-choicers talking about if they overturn RvW that it will be a state issue. But if they overturn it, wouldn't that make it illegal by Supreme Court rule? Meaning it is the law of the land. No, RvW was a supreme court ruling that stated every state must, in some way, provide a means of abortion for a woman who seeks it. The state can have any cut off date it desires, so long as provisions are made, just like SD. In cases where it is absolutly necesarry for the woman's life is abortion ever reasonable. If and when RvW is over turned, it will become a state issue.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 4:55 am
divineseraph hey, i notice something- in pretty much every article i read, i see "abortion opponents" compared to "pro choice"... it makes us sound like we're guerilla fighters trying to destroy such a sacred right as to kill one's own child. Change that up a little. hey, i notice something- in pretty much every article i read, i see "abortion opponents" compared to "pro choice"... it makes us sound like we're guerilla fighters trying to destroy such a unsacred right as to kill one's own child
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 5:50 am
Pyrotechnic Oracle Master Kaiser I keep hearing the pro-choicers talking about if they overturn RvW that it will be a state issue. But if they overturn it, wouldn't that make it illegal by Supreme Court rule? Meaning it is the law of the land. No, RvW was a supreme court ruling that stated every state must, in some way, provide a means of abortion for a woman who seeks it. The state can have any cut off date it desires, so long as provisions are made, just like SD. In cases where it is absolutly necesarry for the woman's life is abortion ever reasonable. If and when RvW is over turned, it will become a state issue. Ah gotcha, thank you for clarifying that.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 12:48 pm
Pyrotechnic Oracle divineseraph hey, i notice something- in pretty much every article i read, i see "abortion opponents" compared to "pro choice"... it makes us sound like we're guerilla fighters trying to destroy such a sacred right as to kill one's own child. Change that up a little. hey, i notice something- in pretty much every article i read, i see "abortion opponents" compared to "pro choice"... it makes us sound like we're guerilla fighters trying to destroy such a unsacred right as to kill one's own child it was sarcasm... sweatdrop anyway, if they don't see a reason to care about "pweeshush baybeesh" then i see no reason why we should care about their "preeshush rieetsh"
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 1:13 pm
divineseraph Pyrotechnic Oracle divineseraph hey, i notice something- in pretty much every article i read, i see "abortion opponents" compared to "pro choice"... it makes us sound like we're guerilla fighters trying to destroy such a sacred right as to kill one's own child. Change that up a little. hey, i notice something- in pretty much every article i read, i see "abortion opponents" compared to "pro choice"... it makes us sound like we're guerilla fighters trying to destroy such a unsacred right as to kill one's own child it was sarcasm... sweatdrop anyway, if they don't see a reason to care about "pweeshush baybeesh" then i see no reason why we should care about their "preeshush rieetsh" I now it was 3nodding I was just stating how it would sound more acurate.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 1:14 pm
AKA People can call abortion murder in they live in South Dakoda.
*sighs* I wish I could see this happening in Canada but I really can't.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 1:16 pm
Beware the Jabberwock AKA People can call abortion murder in they live in South Dakoda.
*sighs* I wish I could see this happening in Canada but I really can't. Yay for people who live in South Dekota...*sigh* I once read a quote on the forum i left recnelty Marinda. It made me think of you. "I'm so glad I live in Canada where somethign liek this will never become an issue." I started gigglign to my self "Wait a few years." I said to my self in responce.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|