|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:14 am
I simply don't understand how they couldn't think it's a baby. I mean what do you get when it comes out, a baby, wouldn't that also suggest that it was a baby before and just as alive.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:44 am
Six words: Death for the sake of death.
Choicers are willing to recite anything for the sake of their precious abortion laws.
They're using false arguments, exaggerations, and sob stories to gain our sympathy.
And whilst some of the stories of incest and rape are horrific in nature, I still believe that the child deserves a chance at life.
Remember this: A Choicer will say anything - and I mean anything - for their "right" to abort an "unwanted fetus".
I agree with you @0. A baby is just as alive the moment it is conceived as it is when it is born.
As a matter of fact, during PBA (Partial Birth Abortion), the head of the baby remains inside of the uterus because the doctor pulls the baby partially out, feet-first; for the moment the head is exposed, the baby is living - by their standards!
Like I said, those six words summarize the entire pro-choice argument: Death for the sake of death.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 08, 2006 12:48 pm
To put it short, they're in denial.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 08, 2006 1:11 pm
They also believe that they are "enlightened" and we are "foolish" for thinking that subperson fetus' are deserving of the same rights as everyone else. Well, if devaluing life is "progressive", then I'm just fine being a backwards southern hick who dont know nuttin bout the wide wide world. rolleyes
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 08, 2006 1:23 pm
Same here. I'm fien with the fact that I've been all over the weastern hemisphere but still know thongin abot anything.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:13 pm
"Alive"? NO! It's not alive, because I say it isn't! It's a proven fact, too. Nevermind that it evolves, creates waste, looks human, and kicks and squirms! It's just a parasite, nothing more. Only dillusional people try to gain sympathy for worthless, non-human leeches. rolleyes
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:15 pm
Lorysa "Alive"? NO! It's not alive, because I say it isn't! It's a proven fact, too. Nevermind that it evolves, creates waste, looks human, and kicks and squirms! It's just a parasite, nothing more. Only dillusional people try to gain sympathy for worthless, non-human leeches. rolleyes Larysa...I htink you've been possed by N.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:20 pm
Pyrotechnic Oracle Lorysa "Alive"? NO! It's not alive, because I say it isn't! It's a proven fact, too. Nevermind that it evolves, creates waste, looks human, and kicks and squirms! It's just a parasite, nothing more. Only dillusional people try to gain sympathy for worthless, non-human leeches. rolleyes Larysa...I htink you've been possed by a Pro-choicer we know. (Wow, "Larysa," I'll have to remember that when I get a girl. Thanks Pyro! ^ ^)
What do you mean? I'm acting like her? sweatdrop I'm being rude, sorry...
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:37 pm
Lorysa Pyrotechnic Oracle Lorysa "Alive"? NO! It's not alive, because I say it isn't! It's a proven fact, too. Nevermind that it evolves, creates waste, looks human, and kicks and squirms! It's just a parasite, nothing more. Only dillusional people try to gain sympathy for worthless, non-human leeches. rolleyes Larysa...I htink you've been possed by a Pro-choicer we know. (Wow, "Larysa," I'll have to remember that when I get a girl. Thanks Pyro! ^ ^)
What do you mean? I'm acting like her? sweatdrop I'm being rude, sorry...YAY! I enadvertanly named Lorysa's future daughter! Any ways, no, not rude. You jsyt soudn exactly liek her.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:41 pm
I'd have to agree with him. You sound just like the person in question, though I'd appreciate it if you both edited out the name, or I will, maybe I'm overstepping my bounds but I think it goes against the rules.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:49 pm
Pyrotechnic Oracle Lorysa Pyrotechnic Oracle Lorysa "Alive"? NO! It's not alive, because I say it isn't! It's a proven fact, too. Nevermind that it evolves, creates waste, looks human, and kicks and squirms! It's just a parasite, nothing more. Only dillusional people try to gain sympathy for worthless, non-human leeches. rolleyes Larysa...I htink you've been possed by a Pro-choicer we know. (Wow, "Larysa," I'll have to remember that when I get a girl. Thanks Pyro! ^ ^)
What do you mean? I'm acting like her? sweatdrop I'm being rude, sorry...YAY! I enadvertanly named Lorysa's future daughter! Any ways, no, not rude. You jsyt soudn exactly liek her. Ooh, okay, then I'll stop. Haha but I feel insane right now, like I don't care what I say or how I say it. xd Weird.lymelady I'd have to agree with him. You sound just like the person in question, though I'd appreciate it if you both edited out the name, or I will, maybe I'm overstepping my bounds but I think it goes against the rules. Even if it isn't against the rules, you're right, it seems close, so. Edited. whee
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 08, 2006 11:53 pm
No wait, you guys are forgetting the potential, I mean because potential means nothing, so it obviously has no chance of birthing.
Waaaaiiit.... last time I checked, weren't the chances of the child dying in the womb less than 50%. Hmmmm, majority percentage usually favors, but of course it isn't guaranteed 'life', meaning it isn't one.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 4:04 am
and when one is asleep, they are currently unable to function conciously- they are, thus, insentient at that time. could not a sleeping person be killed by the pro-choice rules? you can't PROVE that they have pain, and just because they will likely wake up within a few hours, you can't judge by what MIGHT be.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 10:49 am
I've said it before, and I'll say it again: Even when I -was- pro-choice, I always knew that the unborn child was a human being. That's why it was so hard for me to -stay- pro-choice. I just... can't accept that death anymore. I won't let myself.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 12:46 pm
Mcphee I've said it before, and I'll say it again: Even when I -was- pro-choice, I always knew that the unborn child was a human being. That's why it was so hard for me to -stay- pro-choice. I just... can't accept that death anymore. I won't let myself. aww, that's so sweet- it's touching, really, to think that choicers know full well what they are doing, and that means that they can see the truth and accpet it eventually...
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|