|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2012 6:36 am
First of all, I want to clear something up: a person's gender refers to their psyche, whereas a person's sex refers to their genitals. For most people, these are one in the same, but for the sake of this discussion, try to keep the terms separate and not use them interchangeably.
How do you feel about your gender identity? Do you feel that you're expected to dress or act a certain way because of social gender roles? Have you ever felt insecure about your gender identity, either because you have a problem with your physical sex or because you just don't fit the social stereotype for being male or female? Do you think gender roles are important? Why or why not?
Now, I'm male. I've never had any problem with being male. No desire to be female. That being said, I fail to fulfill many "masculine" stereotypes. I'm not good at sports (besides horseback-riding, which is arguably sort of fruity for a bloke anyway), I lean towards more emotion-driven disciplines like the arts. I'm not very strong physically. I'm not physically aggressive. I'm skinny, not muscular. I wouldn't go so far as to say that I'm effeminate, but I am definitely rather lacking in the male stereotype. And I'm pretty okay with all that. It's who I am, and certain male stereotypes (like violence and poor hygiene) are not traits I would want to emulate anyway. I haven't even suffered all that much ridicule.
Gender roles are quickly disappearing. The lines of what is considered "masculine" and "feminine" are getting more and more blurry. As a believer in free will, I see this as a good thing. People should have the freedom to act and express themselves as they see fit, regardless of what's between their legs.
Of course, looser gender roles has also seen the decline of the traditional nuclear family, which some people find very concerning. Myself, not so much.
Anyway, how do you feel, both as it relates to you personally and as it relates to society at large?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2012 8:45 am
I see it as a good thing as well. Of course, this idea of a "nuclear family" disappearing is stupid. I mean, who cares if someone doesn't have nuclear family? Does it effect or hurt you personally. No, so why should it matter?
I'm a female but I wouldn't say I'm extremely girly or anything. I like fashion, but I hate those cheesy romance movies my friends watch. I'd rather watch a sci-fi movie like Star Wars any given day. I'm not very domestic either. I hate doing chores and making my room look super fancy with little doiles and lace and pastel colors. I mean, I guess I want it to be somewhat clean and neat or whatever, but other than I that I can't be bothered. One time my mother took me to Bed, Bath, & Beyond and she kept asking me for assistance in picking out shower curtains, and I really didn't care what the hell she picked. I just wanted to go to the cosmetics aisle and pick out nail polish. I like wearing dresses, but I also like to wear dress shirts and slacks too. So, I'd say I'm not really feminine or masculine, I'm somewhere in the middle.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2012 12:37 pm
Social constructs shouldn't influence Christians; society thinks one way, God thinks another. If anything influences our gender identity, it should be God's word. Quote: Romans 12:1-2 (NIV) 12 Therefore, I urge you, brothers and sisters, in view of God’s mercy, to offer your bodies as a living sacrifice, holy and pleasing to God—this is your true and proper worship. 2 Do not conform to the pattern of this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and approve what God’s will is—his good, pleasing and perfect will. Our lifestyle is an act of worship. If our life is in disaccord with his word, we're worshiping something else, usually ourselves or the world's ideology. So, as long as what you're doing is exemplified as "godly" or "not sinful" in scripture, it shouldn't matter or concern you how society is changing or defining anything. For one reason or the other he wants gender to be clearly-defined and tied to the person's sex (Deu 22:5) [inb4: i'm not implying skirts over pants, lol, b/c clearly both sexes wore robes back then; if you're a woman, you shouldn't dress in a way to pass off as a guy or vice versa, regardless of what gender people wish to be. Honestly, if someone loves God more, wishing to be a different gender shouldn't happen since gender doesn't define who they are as a person; God gives them their identity]. Gender roles function mostly in terms of authority in the household and marriage (Genesis 2:18-25; Num 30:3-15); the different sexes are even instructed to pray differently (1 Cor 11:3-6). So, it wouldn't matter if a guy felt like a girl on the inside; they should pray and prophesy like a guy. YHWH doesn't seem to care about hobbies and careers nor the role in your family while you're under the authority of your parents (so, not married): for instance, Simon had the profession of a tanner, making leather (Acts 10:6), the apostle Paul a tentmaker just like Aquila and his wife Priscilla (Acts 18:1-3). Jacob spent most of his time in the house with his mother and cooked, well-enough to convince his brother (the stereotypical hunter) to give up the firstborn rights/blessing just for a plate of food (Genesis 25:27-34; Hebrews 12:16). His role in the family changed when he left his father's house and became a husband though. Gender roles will continue to exist as long as marriage (as defined by the Father) continues to exist—that would mean up until Yeshua's return/the resurrection since people will continue to marry until the last days, emphasis on biblical marriage not what the world defines as "marriage", and once resurrection/translation/transformation occurs on our bodies, no one will even be given into marriage, so I imagine all gender roles will cease to exist then. marriage until Yeshua returns:Quote: Matthew 24:36-39 (NIV) 36 “But about that day or hour no one knows, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son,[a] but only the Father. 37 As it was in the days of Noah, so it will be at the coming of the Son of Man. 38 For in the days before the flood, people were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, up to the day Noah entered the ark; 39 and they knew nothing about what would happen until the flood came and took them all away. That is how it will be at the coming of the Son of Man. Footnotes: a. Matthew 24:36 Some manuscripts do not have nor the Son. the resurrected don't marry:Quote: Matthew 22:30 (NIV) 30 At the resurrection people will neither marry nor be given in marriage; they will be like the angels in heaven. Mark 12:25 (NIV) 25 When the dead rise, they will neither marry nor be given in marriage; they will be like the angels in heaven. when the resurrection happens:Quote: 1 Thessalonians 4:16 (NIV) 16 For the Lord himself will come down from heaven, with a loud command, with the voice of the archangel and with the trumpet call of God, and the dead in Christ will rise first. bodies changing:Quote: 1 Corinthians 15:51-52 (NIV) 51 Listen, I tell you a mystery: We will not all sleep, but we will all be changed— 52 in a flash, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trumpet. For the trumpet will sound, the dead will be raised imperishable, and we will be changed.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2012 8:21 pm
I'll be honest. This whole notion of Christians living somehow "outside of society" is a bit of a cop-out, in my opinion. We may not be of this world, but we sure do have to live in it, and anyone who thinks that they're not affected by the society in which we live is deluding themselves. I'm not saying that we shouldn't strive to be godly and avoid negative influences, but it's impossible to not be affected by, and indeed be a part of our current society. Unless you choose to cut yourself off from the world, I suppose, but if you're using a computer to get online, I doubt that applies to you.
As for roles within marriage, I think each person should perform the duties they're best equipped to perform. Not all women are best-suited to staying at home with the kids. Not all men are best-suited to be the breadwinner. Cultivating an effective partnership with a spouse is all about figuring out who's better at what, and running the household accordingly.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 9:23 am
The bible doesn't agree with that either: he told them to go make disciples out of all nations, not stay in your isolated groups 24/7 and never communicate with the outside world. The point is: are you cherishing their social norms, or are you living by the creator's instructions, how he tells you to interact with creation (including our own body, since we're creations). That's what it comes down to; not whether you exist on the same landmass or use a pencil or a computer, a flashlight or a torch. Whether we're living in a high-tech society or not, are we living in a way that doesn't violate his design and order?
I didn't mention raising kids or breadwinning because scripture doesn't limit that to either sex. That's the task of both parents. In Proverbs 31:10-31, that godly wife is not just a homemaker, she works too; In 2 Thessalonians 3:10, the man who doesn't work, has no right to eat. In 1 Timothy 5:8, we are told to provide for our families; since the man is the leader of the house most of the responsibility falls on him, but it's not limited to him only. Aquilas and his wife Priscilla, like I mentioned before, were both tent-makers. They're married. They both work. A child that grows up undisciplined brings shame to both mother and father (Proverbs 15:20, 19:13, 23:22-25, 29:15; Ephesians 6:4) Why? because they're both responsible for raising them. You're applying a stereotype as if that's what scripture supports when it doesn't. Certain groups with their man-made ideology might subscribe to such thoughts, but that's not what his word supports. No matter how you divvy up the chores and the workload, however, there is a hierarchy of authority in the family that God wants obeyed (1 Corinthians 11:3). I don't think we can argue with that, plus it's new testament.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2012 11:11 am
I apologise for putting words in your mouth.
I suppose I see a lot of Christians spouting ideas against being a part of earthly society, as well as enforcing very narrow gender roles, especially within marriage (and I was raised in a very "traditional" family where my father worked and my mother stayed home and cared for the children, which was typical of most families at our perish...gosh I feel old). I wrongly projected those ideals onto you.
I guess it was mainly the statement "Social constructs shouldn't influence Christians" that I took issue with. It's impossible NOT to be influenced by social constructs unless you cut yourself off from society. That's just a reality, and I think it's important to recognise that so you can be more aware of which of your actions are driven by social norms and which aren't, and such awareness will, ideally, allow one to avoid some of the uglier social pitfalls.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High-functioning Werewolf
|
Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2013 9:13 pm
I don't feel like I really have a gender. I'm fairly masculine for a female. I'm outdoorsy, I don't care about my hair or my nails, and I like action movies. I do enjoy some feminine things, too, though. And I'm really fascinated by "Proverbs 31 Housewives", which I think is weird. I find myself wondering from time to time whether or not I would enjoy that kind of family dynamic, or whether I just like the idea of it. sweatdrop
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2013 3:55 am
real eyes realize The bible doesn't agree with that either: he told them to go make disciples out of all nations, not stay in your isolated groups 24/7 and never communicate with the outside world. The point is: are you cherishing their social norms, or are you living by the creator's instructions, how he tells you to interact with creation (including our own body, since we're creations). That's what it comes down to; not whether you exist on the same landmass or use a pencil or a computer, a flashlight or a torch. Whether we're living in a high-tech society or not, are we living in a way that doesn't violate his design and order? I didn't mention raising kids or breadwinning because scripture doesn't limit that to either sex. That's the task of both parents. In Proverbs 31:10-31, that godly wife is not just a homemaker, she works too; In 2 Thessalonians 3:10, the man who doesn't work, has no right to eat. In 1 Timothy 5:8, we are told to provide for our families; since the man is the leader of the house most of the responsibility falls on him, but it's not limited to him only. Aquilas and his wife Priscilla, like I mentioned before, were both tent-makers. They're married. They both work. A child that grows up undisciplined brings shame to both mother and father (Proverbs 15:20, 19:13, 23:22-25, 29:15; Ephesians 6:4) Why? because they're both responsible for raising them. You're applying a stereotype as if that's what scripture supports when it doesn't. Certain groups with their man-made ideology might subscribe to such thoughts, but that's not what his word supports. No matter how you divvy up the chores and the workload, however, there is a hierarchy of authority in the family that God wants obeyed (1 Corinthians 11:3). I don't think we can argue with that, plus it's new testament. Real Eyes Realize is right. A lot of those Male to Female job instructions come straight out of 1950's America, and not necessarily the Bible. I like to cook and I don't mind cleaning doesn't mean I can't hammer a nail in the wall or make tools out of wood shop (Which I do). Just to reiterate her statement in order, God has/d given a Man in the household authority, to show reverence to Christ. It wasn't meant to suppress/oppress a woman's liberty to work. Mind you feminazi's like to run around with that false label.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 3:51 pm
I am happy and proud to be a guy, despite how society makes us seem like idiots, or abusers. I am not into sports, in fact i get bored watching them, i dont have any real desire to be a bulky hunk of meat, though i do wish to work out, not to look good for the ladies or to be some body builder, but to keep my health up because of my heart condition i have to be careful, which is one reason i dont play sports. Stereotype wise i am Japanese who are depicted as masters of math, but me, i have brain damage which makes math harder for me. I enjoy it to a point but other then that i dont like it. Guys are depicted as people who enjoy to duke it out with others, but i try to refrain from fighting. I dont like how i feel when i fight, when i am fighting enjoy it way to much, which is not who i am. I am a calm, quiet, slow to speak quick to listen type of guy. I dont like being surrounded by people, i enjoy my solitude or small company.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 4:17 am
Ophelias Bathwater I don't feel like I really have a gender. I'm fairly masculine for a female. I'm outdoorsy, I don't care about my hair or my nails, and I like action movies. I do enjoy some feminine things, too, though. And I'm really fascinated by "Proverbs 31 Housewives", which I think is weird. I find myself wondering from time to time whether or not I would enjoy that kind of family dynamic, or whether I just like the idea of it. sweatdrop I guess what I have trouble with is what exactly makes something "masculine" or "feminine." Is caring about your appearance inherently feminine? I don't think so. I also wouldn't say that enjoying being outdoors is inherently masculine. For what it's worth, I care about my appearance (not to an obsessive degree, but I like to be well-groomed and dress in an attractive and flattering way) and I've never been much of one for hiking or camping, and I'm a man. *shrug* I do frequently ask myself how much of gender is social, and how much of it is biological. My best theory is that it was biological at earlier points in human history, which was the start of social gender roles, which have now become so ingrained in our society that it's hard to tell. I wonder what would happen if we all woke up one day with no concept of gender roles. I'd be interested to see if similar social stereotypes still evolve or not.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|