Liquid_Len
Americans have a way of not accepting any type of music but their own or any other thought but their own. Their study methods (to my opinion) focus more on performance and less on composition. They also tend to disregard pre-classical music. I don't see any reason to disregard any type of music so it's kind of hard to treat their opinions with respect not to mention that I actually PREFER pre-classical music.
Further more, I have a friend who studied music at an academy in Basel. He can improvise four-part fugues. I'm not sure Julliard graduates could compose a good fugue, let alone improvise one.
I'd have to agree with you on that one.
I'm not a big fan of juliard, and I haven't liked much that I've heard out of there. They seem to have a big focus on contempory music, and I know it is completely personal, but I find a lot of modernist contempory music lacklustre and uninspired
confused ...
I've no doubt that juliard study fugue writing, but I don't think they place much emphasis on it. I think they take the stance that fugue is no longer useful; which is a shame. There's this closed-mindedness in american contempory music. It's a shame they didn't go in the directions they were pushed by Dvorak and Saint-Saens.
If the eroica trio and the five browns are the best to come out of a school, I wouldn't be sending my children there.