|
|
You think this will be successful? |
Yeah, it's a fresh take on some classic characters. |
|
11% |
[ 2 ] |
Maybe... depends on how they market it. |
|
22% |
[ 4 ] |
No way. They're ******** my childhood! |
|
66% |
[ 12 ] |
|
Total Votes : 18 |
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 20, 2005 12:08 am
[ Message temporarily off-line ]
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 20, 2005 12:15 am
so ... Looney Tunes / Power Rangers / Earth X / Japanses cultural influence
?! eek confused ... crying
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 20, 2005 12:19 am
WB can go ******** themselves. Seriously.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 20, 2005 4:57 am
They're calling the new Taz, Spaz?
That's an insult in the UK! It's short for spastic and most people don't like it being used especially in TV. They had to edit Buffy because Willow called Dawn a bit of a spaz.
Argghhh! *Feels childhood getting ********* crying
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 20, 2005 5:05 am
nooooo!
why must people ruin everything!!!
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 20, 2005 8:03 am
. . . Y'know. On the subject of Looney Toons being relevant, I'd havee tio say that in many ways, they're not. By this I mean that a great amount of the humour that extends beyond the cheap sight gags were topical humour from the eras in which the original cartoons were created. The current audience doesn't even realize that there are jokes that go beyomd the simple slapstick.
But completely reconfiguring the characters into a futuristic a**l raping of them? I think not. If I want futuristic Looneys, I'll record Duck Dodgers so I can watch it even more.
Besides. If they wantyed to use "new versions of old characters . . ." well, I already said it to you in AIM. The Tiny Toons worked just fine in that capacity.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 20, 2005 8:15 am
That's just weird. It's like they're making a "Catwoman" film all over again here. Unfortunately, most fans of Loony Toons ARE kids themselves, not neccesarily adult nostalgia freaks, and don't kids have some sense of consumer loyalty?
Mostly to me, it's a sad reflection of America copying anime. The pres said so himself in that news reel. It's catchy and shiny and robots and ninja. But everyone fails to see that the real appeal of anime is the maturity level, because older audiences can buy more merchandise. 14 year olds aren't watching Loony Toons because they crave some thing edgier. But we're not Japanese! We don't culturally share the same ideals and feeling towards things. Few point out that anime only encorporate one race in most every show: this kind of Japanese-white hybrid. America is a mixing pot and all new cartoons have a healthy dose of ethnicity. Japan just doesn't have a diverse culture, and can't reflect that because all anime is catered towards the Japanese. I love how popular anime is with homosexuals and kids who are just starting to be aware of the gay presence in America; Shounen ai, yaoi, shoujo ai all that s**t is seemingly "acceptable" in Japan, but they don't realize that it's just as taboo, but it's simply not taboo enought to watch as an audience. It's misleading. It debunks feminism. It's just a different culture and audiences should respect it, not worship it the way otaku seem to do.
AUGH! I went into anime-rant mode. I'm sorry. gonk
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 20, 2005 8:18 am
Hey its fine.
So WB wants to rape another show pony that they've counted on for years. GOOD FOR THEM! scream goddamnit I'm tired of hearing what acts of stupidity they are going to to next!
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 20, 2005 8:30 am
Meh -_- I have to disagree on some parts. The populaiorty of Japanese anime isn't necessarily because it's actually more mature, but because American fans are sold that misconception. A lot of the stuff that's called more matuire (Dragonball Z, Naruto, Tenchi, yadda yadda, yadda. You probably know the list, and I'm not saying it's a universal) really isn't. It's just a case of the Japanese not seeing violence or sex as being as inappropriate for children as we do.
Another problem on the same vein is that many Americans continue to try to peddle the misconception that animation (or even comic books, for that matter) is for kids.
I have a strong dislike for Todd McFarlane. But I really wish that the Spawn series had gone on for much longer than it did.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 20, 2005 9:10 am
Continuing the topic of "relevance",I meant relevant as in apparently sight gags and falling anvils are too simple for today's audiences. We need dark, mysterious crime fighters with superpowers instead, apparently.
I wonder what their voices are going to be like...
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 20, 2005 9:33 am
Tad Ryerstad Continuing the topic of "relevance",I meant relevant as in apparently sight gags and falling anvils are too simple for today's audiences. We need dark, mysterious crime fighters with superpowers instead, apparently. I wonder what their voices are going to be like... But looney Toons were more than just sight gags. I think that's a part of the problem, as well. They've degenrated from spacing social commentary and in-jopkes relevant to the time they live in to a long series of slapstick. Edit: I think it's the loss of the social commentary that's made any recent attempts at Looney Tunes fail.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 20, 2005 9:44 am
Good lord. Looner Tunes was a legacy in it's time and still is to this day. This just spits in the face of that. Some things should NOT be interfered with.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:19 am
Mssr Remy LeBeau Good lord. Looner Tunes was a legacy in it's time and still is to this day. This just spits in the face of that. Some things should NOT be interfered with. But . . . but . . . Tiny Toons gonk !! They were tiny, they were toony, they were all a little Looney . . .
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:34 am
Tiny Toons weren't a whole new thing though, they still had the original characters. Tiny Toons was an excellent way of making the old material look fresh. Personally, I don't even care for Loony Toons, they were too formulaic or whatever, but Tiny Toons was my favorite show back in the day.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:50 am
Selina Kyle That's just weird. It's like they're making a "Catwoman" film all over again here. Unfortunately, most fans of Loony Toons ARE kids themselves, not neccesarily adult nostalgia freaks, and don't kids have some sense of consumer loyalty? Mostly to me, it's a sad reflection of America copying anime. The pres said so himself in that news reel. It's catchy and shiny and robots and ninja. But everyone fails to see that the real appeal of anime is the maturity level, because older audiences can buy more merchandise. 14 year olds aren't watching Loony Toons because they crave some thing edgier. But we're not Japanese! We don't culturally share the same ideals and feeling towards things. Few point out that anime only encorporate one race in most every show: this kind of Japanese-white hybrid. America is a mixing pot and all new cartoons have a healthy dose of ethnicity. Japan just doesn't have a diverse culture, and can't reflect that because all anime is catered towards the Japanese. I love how popular anime is with homosexuals and kids who are just starting to be aware of the gay presence in America; Shounen ai, yaoi, shoujo ai all that s**t is seemingly "acceptable" in Japan, but they don't realize that it's just as taboo, but it's simply not taboo enought to watch as an audience. It's misleading. It debunks feminism. It's just a different culture and audiences should respect it, not worship it the way otaku seem to do. AUGH! I went into anime-rant mode. I'm sorry. gonk Shounen-ai means ***** these days, Selina. The new word is BL or Boys Love. Yes, I know it's extremely paradoxical but that's how it goes. Anyway you're 100% right.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|