|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2011 1:09 am
I'm honestly still a little confused.. When I talk to my boyfriend about this, he always says "You're gay!!"
So here's my stats:
I am attracted to both genders, and for the longest time I thought I was Pansexual, because I can love anyone regardless of gender, etc..
Now, onto sex, I am only "sexually" attracted to males.
I've imagined sex with a girl, and it just feels.. *yuck*
I view women as an object of beauty, and to think of having sex with one, I just wouldn't be able to view girls in the same light again..
Then again, sometimes I find myself attracted to certain parts of the female anatomy.. And I get crushes on girls a lot, sometimes on friends of mine..
So I know I am definitely sexually and emotionally attracted to guys, and I love guys wink They are great..
So, am I just gay? Or Pansexual/Gay-leaning? What do you's think?
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2011 4:14 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2011 4:22 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2011 4:25 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2011 8:56 am
The problem is that gender and sexuality aren't binary. Or anything close to binary. Everyone's different. Labels can fit some people, but we aren't all meant to fit into molds. That'd be boring. Do whatever feels right in your heart. It's sometimes more comforting to have a label, but with or without one, you're still the same lovable you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2011 9:07 am
People, please remember that there's a fine-line difference between "attraction" and "sexuality." This is why labeling [especially in our community] is extremely tricky. My two cents... F$#% socially-constructed identity. You are who you are. Period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2011 11:02 am
GAY I have a friend the same way he thought he liked me but it was just too weird and not right
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2011 11:05 am
you're gay, sweetie. you may think of women as beautiful, but thats normal. im gay and i think of alot of women as beautiful but i could never feel for them in a sexual manner.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2011 2:10 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2011 4:00 pm
I agree with Shanna, you're open-minded gay. Some would call if homoflexible.I know what you mean though, classifying yourself can be hard. I've been slightly attracted to one or two of the very few transvestites/transgendered people I've met/seen in the media, but I haven't met enough of those types of people to consider myself pansexual quite yet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2011 4:07 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2011 6:45 pm
If you really need a label, homoflexible. But since you don't like sex with women, you could say you're a panromantic homosexual. Your fascination with female anatomy has nothing to do with your sexual attraction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2011 8:24 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2011 9:12 am
I think you are bisexual with a preference for men
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2011 9:44 am
DJ Arctic Wolf you're gay, sweetie. you may think of women as beautiful, but thats normal. im gay and i think of alot of women as beautiful but i could never feel for them in a sexual manner. This is me
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
