Twin Towers brought down by chemical reaction? | Page 1 | Truth Seeking Truthers. Truth Seekers | Guild Forums

Obscurus
Crew

Otherworldly Foe

18,675 Points

200
100
100

Offline

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2011 6:59 pm

Were Twin Towers felled by chemical blasts?

This is a really elegant explanation for all of the accounts of explosions, demolition, etc. What do you guys think?

Posted: Wed Sep 28, 2011 2:34 am

Octane is a chemical and a fire is a chemical reaction. Now if you want to say that the jet fuel didn't cause the collapse, then that's your opinion.

God Emperor Akhenaton

Offline

Obscurus
Crew

Otherworldly Foe

18,675 Points

200
100
100

Offline

Posted: Wed Sep 28, 2011 7:50 pm

God Emperor Akhenaton

Octane is a chemical and a fire is a chemical reaction. Now if you want to say that the jet fuel didn't cause the collapse, then that's your opinion.

The article above is proposing that the burning jet fuel melted the aluminum aircraft bodies and caused them to flow down through the buildings, eventually coming into contact with the water used in the fire suppression systems. This water-molten aluminum mixing would have caused violent explosions.

I thought the explanation was interesting because not only is it not far from the official story (only in the specific mechanism) but it also explains the reports of explosions after the initial impacts and possibly the "controlled demolition" look of the collapses. I know there are a lot of people here that don't buy the official story so I'm curious to see how they feel about this relatively mundane (but still alternate) explanation.

Posted: Wed Sep 28, 2011 8:12 pm

Obscurus

God Emperor Akhenaton

Octane is a chemical and a fire is a chemical reaction. Now if you want to say that the jet fuel didn't cause the collapse, then that's your opinion.

The article above is proposing that the burning jet fuel melted the aluminum aircraft bodies and caused them to flow down through the buildings, eventually coming into contact with the water used in the fire suppression systems. This water-molten aluminum mixing would have caused violent explosions.

I thought the explanation was interesting because not only is it not far from the official story (only in the specific mechanism) but it also explains the reports of explosions after the initial impacts and possibly the "controlled demolition" look of the collapses. I know there are a lot of people here that don't buy the official story so I'm curious to see how they feel about this relatively mundane (but still alternate) explanation.

There is an elementary pyro explanation for the explosions. It's called a flashover. Fire needs 2 sources of fuel (Oxygen usually one of them) and heat. When there is let's say a room with no air, but it's very hot and maybe doused in Jet fuel, then all you need is air to reach the area (Called a backdraft) and you have a bomb. This is what a backdraft can do.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t1_u-eAq5QU&feature=related

God Emperor Akhenaton

Offline

Obscurus
Crew

Otherworldly Foe

18,675 Points

200
100
100

Offline

Posted: Wed Sep 28, 2011 8:21 pm

God Emperor Akhenaton

Obscurus

God Emperor Akhenaton

Octane is a chemical and a fire is a chemical reaction. Now if you want to say that the jet fuel didn't cause the collapse, then that's your opinion.

The article above is proposing that the burning jet fuel melted the aluminum aircraft bodies and caused them to flow down through the buildings, eventually coming into contact with the water used in the fire suppression systems. This water-molten aluminum mixing would have caused violent explosions.

I thought the explanation was interesting because not only is it not far from the official story (only in the specific mechanism) but it also explains the reports of explosions after the initial impacts and possibly the "controlled demolition" look of the collapses. I know there are a lot of people here that don't buy the official story so I'm curious to see how they feel about this relatively mundane (but still alternate) explanation.

There is an elementary pyro explanation for the explosions. It's called a flashover. Fire needs 2 sources of fuel (Oxygen usually one of them) and heat. When there is let's say a room with no air, but it's very hot and maybe doused in Jet fuel, then all you need is air to reach the area (Called a backdraft) and you have a bomb. This is what a backdraft can do.

]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t1_u-eAq5QU&feature=related

We'll probably never know either way. My understanding was that the official story was that the planes hit, the jet fuel was consumed in the fire, and that in turn weakened the steel structure of the buildings resulting in the collapse of the towers. It doesn't seem to address any explosions at all aside from the initial impacts. Granted I've never read the 9/11 Commission Report.

Posted: Thu Sep 29, 2011 4:41 pm

Well... If human thoughts are the biproduct of electromagnetic and chemical reactions, then I'd say it's a good start.

EmotronPlays

Dapper Fatcat

Offline

Welcome to Gaia! ::

Gaia Guilds

Truth Seekers - Truthers.

Quick Reply

More Information