|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 7:22 pm
I was wondering if anyone has ever seen some things in Lolita fashion that made you kind of perplex as to what were they thinkiing. question xd
Some could be some really crazy clothes, that although have lolita qualities, still seemed kind of off, or just kind of with really weird accessores (it doubles as a skirt, dress, and a table cloth!!!)
One i've seen was a blouse that had a lot of detatchables. Detatchable sleeves, collars, and even pockets. It made me wonder what would happen if you happened to lost parts of it. xd So all you had was one sleeve and pocket, and half a collar.
this thread isn't to bash people of certain ways they dress, or saying "this is right, and you're wrong." type of stuff.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 8:38 pm
I was trying to explain what pocky is to a friend in the UK [via msn], and googled Decorer because that was the pocky I had been munching on that day, and found the following pictures:


(along with the pocky)
 ^ The cutest, most Lolita pocky EVER.
And I fell in love with them. I'm not sure if the style is actually called Decorer, but I love it. I don't think it's a lolita don't, but I also don't think it's exactly lolita. [Not sure if this fits in this topic, but what the heck!] I'm posting this in this topic because it's so.. crazy. So layered, so full of.. colour and brightness. It is kind've a 'what were you thinking?!' kind of thing to me, although the end result is wonderful. I think it's super cute, and would be fun for the days when I do feel like wearing constrictive lolita-wear.
Does anyone know what this type of dress might be called so I can find more pictures, and what everyone thinks?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2006 12:24 am
[.SamusAran.]
I was trying to explain what pocky is to a friend in the UK [via msn], and googled Decorer because that was the pocky I had been munching on that day, and found the following pictures:


(along with the pocky)
 ^ The cutest, most Lolita pocky EVER.
And I fell in love with them. I'm not sure if the style is actually called Decorer, but I love it. I don't think it's a lolita don't, but I also don't think it's exactly lolita. [Not sure if this fits in this topic, but what the heck!] I'm posting this in this topic because it's so.. crazy. So layered, so full of.. colour and brightness. It is kind've a 'what were you thinking?!' kind of thing to me, although the end result is wonderful. I think it's super cute, and would be fun for the days when I do feel like wearing constrictive lolita-wear.
Does anyone know what this type of dress might be called so I can find more pictures, and what everyone thinks?
I believe it's called Decora. Try Fresh FRUiTS for more. Or if you live by a Japanese market check out their bookstore. Zipper, Kera, FRUiTS, Cutie, etc. will probbly have some.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2006 8:20 am
O_O first picture! girl on right! *steals legwarmer/sock combo*
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 12, 2006 7:54 am
[.SamusAran.]
I was trying to explain what pocky is to a friend in the UK [via msn], and googled Decorer because that was the pocky I had been munching on that day, and found the following pictures:


(along with the pocky)
 ^ The cutest, most Lolita pocky EVER.
And I fell in love with them. I'm not sure if the style is actually called Decorer, but I love it. I don't think it's a lolita don't, but I also don't think it's exactly lolita. [Not sure if this fits in this topic, but what the heck!] I'm posting this in this topic because it's so.. crazy. So layered, so full of.. colour and brightness. It is kind've a 'what were you thinking?!' kind of thing to me, although the end result is wonderful. I think it's super cute, and would be fun for the days when I do feel like wearing constrictive lolita-wear.
Does anyone know what this type of dress might be called so I can find more pictures, and what everyone thinks?
This fashion is called Fruits ^^ i have a huge book at my place with loooads of pictures like this (:
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 12, 2006 7:59 am
Yeah, that's what I was thinking, it was called Fruits. ^^ It looks really girly like lolita fashion, but it's not exactly lolita, but that doesnt mean it is awesome!
I wonder how long it takes them to get dressed? o_O That's a lot of accesories, i dont think i even have 1/4 of that. @_@
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 12, 2006 9:25 am
Some of the elements of the FRUiTs fashions are cute, really, but some of it is just too much.
Bright colors? ... awesome. Layering garments? ... even more awesome. Having so much on that you can't see where one item starts and the other ends? ... not awesome.
Personally, I think the best part of all of this is the layering they use on their socks/stockings. I am a fiend for legwear, so I do much of that already. White legwarmers over red socks over black fishnet is gleeful, I think. The first image, as was already said, has the adorable socks on the girl on the right.
That part of her outfit, I'd wear. But I'd definitely have to tone down the mosaic of beads, patterns and rando-s**t or else my sense of aesthetics would probably wish to shoot me in the head. Honestly. It's just too much! You need to know where to look, and with those girls, it's impossible for your brain to get a rest at all.
As for true Lolita don'ts-- I'd have to say that I've seen some scary, scary make up and hair that didn't belong on Lolis [ie: Black eyeliner dripping down the cheeks of a sweet Lolita who hadn't any black anywhere else on here, colors that don't match with the garments, etc.]. Make up always seems to be treated as an afterthought, just sort of tossed on with personal preference. It bothers me when people don't realize that how they present their face and hair is part of the outfit..
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 12, 2006 9:52 am
Oh awesome, awesome. Many thanks.
Anyways, Lolita don'ts:
All white outfit: black boots. ICK!
All brown outfit: black boots and vice versa. Black and brown = not good together! The only way black and brown can work, is if you were to wear alot of one colour, and accessorize with the other. [As said on What Not To Wear.]
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 12, 2006 1:01 pm
PsychodelicPenguin Yeah, that's what I was thinking, it was called Fruits. ^^ This is a common misunderstanding, but the fashion is not called fruits. (Not in Japan at least). Fruits is the name of a book and a magazine which has photograhps of Tokyo street fashion, at it includes many styles : normal western fashion, punk, hippie, lolita, gal, decora. The frilly bright style with lots of accessories is called "fruits" a lot of times in the west, but the Japanese refer to it as decora, short from decorate. The style was very popular around the late 90s, but it has almost completely disappeared from the streets now, although I've heard rumours that it would be coming back slowly. One of the main inspirations of the decora style is the singer Tomoe Shinohara, and the style was called "shinorer" in its early days. Please use correct terms, okay? 3nodding I'm not going to discuss the aethestics of decora here, but general loli don'ts imho are * smoking * trashy, nonpolished look * too much makeup, please leave it to Mana, he is the only one who looks good with a face pasted white * trying too much. You don't have to always be cutesy wutsey nicey yay! Talk normally...
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 12, 2006 5:00 pm
hui_lai_lee PsychodelicPenguin Yeah, that's what I was thinking, it was called Fruits. ^^ This is a common misunderstanding, but the fashion is not called fruits. (Not in Japan at least). Fruits is the name of a book and a magazine which has photograhps of Tokyo street fashion, at it includes many styles : normal western fashion, punk, hippie, lolita, gal, decora. The frilly bright style with lots of accessories is called "fruits" a lot of times in the west, but the Japanese refer to it as decora, short from decorate. The style was very popular around the late 90s, but it has almost completely disappeared from the streets now, although I've heard rumours that it would be coming back slowly. One of the main inspirations of the decora style is the singer Tomoe Shinohara, and the style was called "shinorer" in its early days. Please use correct terms, okay? 3nodding I'm not going to discuss the aethestics of decora here, but general loli don'ts imho are * smoking * trashy, nonpolished look * too much makeup, please leave it to Mana, he is the only one who looks good with a face pasted white * trying too much. You don't have to always be cutesy wutsey nicey yay! Talk normally... I thought FRUiTS always was capitalized except with the "i"?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 12, 2006 6:29 pm
akenon hui_lai_lee PsychodelicPenguin Yeah, that's what I was thinking, it was called Fruits. ^^ This is a common misunderstanding, but the fashion is not called fruits. (Not in Japan at least). Fruits is the name of a book and a magazine which has photograhps of Tokyo street fashion, at it includes many styles : normal western fashion, punk, hippie, lolita, gal, decora. The frilly bright style with lots of accessories is called "fruits" a lot of times in the west, but the Japanese refer to it as decora, short from decorate. The style was very popular around the late 90s, but it has almost completely disappeared from the streets now, although I've heard rumours that it would be coming back slowly. One of the main inspirations of the decora style is the singer Tomoe Shinohara, and the style was called "shinorer" in its early days. Please use correct terms, okay? 3nodding I'm not going to discuss the aethestics of decora here, but general loli don'ts imho are * smoking * trashy, nonpolished look * too much makeup, please leave it to Mana, he is the only one who looks good with a face pasted white * trying too much. You don't have to always be cutesy wutsey nicey yay! Talk normally... I thought FRUiTS always was capitalized except with the "i"? It is.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 12, 2006 7:09 pm
hui_lai_lee This is a common misunderstanding, but the fashion is not called fruits. (Not in Japan at least). Fruits is the name of a book and a magazine which has photograhps of Tokyo street fashion, at it includes many styles : normal western fashion, punk, hippie, lolita, gal, decora. The frilly bright style with lots of accessories is called "fruits" a lot of times in the west, but the Japanese refer to it as decora, short from decorate. The style was very popular around the late 90s, but it has almost completely disappeared from the streets now, although I've heard rumours that it would be coming back slowly. One of the main inspirations of the decora style is the singer Tomoe Shinohara, and the style was called "shinorer" in its early days. Please use correct terms, okay? 3nodding That's actually the first time I've heard this disputed, though I have heard something like "shinorer" before in reference to Tomoe Shinohara [Her promos for Ultra Relax were insanely brightly colored], though I think that it may have just been "shinore" before [or shinorei? I don't know. I assume they're bastardisations of what you mentioned]. Ah. Yea.
I'm genuinely curious though, now. Is there a reason that the Decora style has been so mislabeled? Is it because of the fruit motifs they show so often? Is it because the magazine itself favors the style in their spreads and articles? Or is there another, less than obvious reason I might be overlooking?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 12, 2006 8:09 pm
boconnotto hui_lai_lee This is a common misunderstanding, but the fashion is not called fruits. (Not in Japan at least). Fruits is the name of a book and a magazine which has photograhps of Tokyo street fashion, at it includes many styles : normal western fashion, punk, hippie, lolita, gal, decora. The frilly bright style with lots of accessories is called "fruits" a lot of times in the west, but the Japanese refer to it as decora, short from decorate. The style was very popular around the late 90s, but it has almost completely disappeared from the streets now, although I've heard rumours that it would be coming back slowly. One of the main inspirations of the decora style is the singer Tomoe Shinohara, and the style was called "shinorer" in its early days. Please use correct terms, okay? 3nodding That's actually the first time I've heard this disputed, though I have heard something like "shinorer" before in reference to Tomoe Shinohara [Her promos for Ultra Relax were insanely brightly colored], though I think that it may have just been "shinore" before [or shinorei? I don't know. I assume they're bastardisations of what you mentioned]. Ah. Yea.
I'm genuinely curious though, now. Is there a reason that the Decora style has been so mislabeled? Is it because of the fruit motifs they show so often? Is it because the magazine itself favors the style in their spreads and articles? Or is there another, less than obvious reason I might be overlooking?I think the mislabel is because of the magazine's title. It's like here we've got the Gothic Beauty magazine, and then people dispute "well THIS person isn't goth, they're... cybergoth/romantigoth/ect!" Sorta the same thing. Though they look fruity to me. Maybe because they wear a lot of fruit stuff, too.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2006 3:56 am
C a t h a r s i s I think the mislabel is because of the magazine's title. It's like here we've got the Gothic Beauty magazine, and then people dispute "well THIS person isn't goth, they're... cybergoth/romantigoth/ect!" Sorta the same thing. Though they look fruity to me. Maybe because they wear a lot of fruit stuff, too. Yeah, I mistaked it for the book. sweatdrop Woopsie. I think another lolita don't could be the use of sexual items (such as those gag thingies..) , but maybe those are used as irony, like with the blood. Something totally opposite than the innocent clothes they wear.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2006 6:44 am
PsychodelicPenguin C a t h a r s i s I think the mislabel is because of the magazine's title. It's like here we've got the Gothic Beauty magazine, and then people dispute "well THIS person isn't goth, they're... cybergoth/romantigoth/ect!" Sorta the same thing. Though they look fruity to me. Maybe because they wear a lot of fruit stuff, too. Yeah, I mistaked it for the book. sweatdrop Woopsie. I think another lolita don't could be the use of sexual items (such as those gag thingies..) , but maybe those are used as irony, like with the blood. Something totally opposite than the innocent clothes they wear. Taking the novel Lolita into consideration, I'm not sure that the sex-props are entirely out of context? Ah. But that's something else, entirely, to explore. Lord knows that Mana was stage molested enough to last him a lifetime. .:blink:.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|