|
|
Should Game L be restarted? |
Yes |
|
84% |
[ 16 ] |
No |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
Abstain |
|
15% |
[ 3 ] |
|
Total Votes : 19 |
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jul 12, 2011 3:32 pm
It seems to be a popular idea for Game L to be restarted and an idea I am personallyinclined to agree with.
However, in the interests of fair play and guild rules, I am putting it up to a vote. Voting will be active from now until this time (23.30 GMT) Friday.
If anyone has any additional comments, please add them here.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jul 12, 2011 5:51 pm
I am all kinds of in favor for this, but would it be possible for a minor rule edit? It seemed the rules, while logical, left too much in the way of a gap between killer and their minions, as it were, thus making the game quite slow, and for such a small group of players, if nothing is done to rectify this, the game will either end just as swiftly, or become a long stalemate. Nobody wants either of those.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jul 12, 2011 8:54 pm
I can see where you're coming from with that. I honestly didn't think it'd be that hard to get the names out, though. It's no tougher than being NR // L in this case, right?
Buuut. Does everyone agree that I need to make it easier for them to find eachother? Those in favor of that idea may feel free to make suggestions for how that should be done.
Actually I'll just take any feedback on the rules while the voting commences.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2011 6:04 am
I'd suggest doing exactly what you thought of doing, namely, give the Eyes Kira's name. It still requires a good bit of footwork, but still make it just easy enough to work.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2011 12:48 pm
Okay, sounds good. 3nodding
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2011 1:08 pm
The game should definitely be restarted. I feel terrible that I couldn't assume the role, and it was pretty much over at that point.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2011 2:31 pm
Yeah, pretty much no one got to do their role, did they? gonk
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 15, 2011 6:59 am
One more point has just occurred to me. Since it's pretty much a given that we're going to re-do this, should it still be classed as Game L or should it be classed as game LI?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 15, 2011 8:53 am
I was thinking of either calling it Game L, or calling it L-2. As in, a number that's not a roman numeral to imply this is a sequel to L rather than an entirely different game. I stole this concept from Final Fantasy.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 15, 2011 3:07 pm
Anyway, I'm gonna try to put the sign-ups up tonight. 3nodding
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 15, 2011 3:27 pm
L-2 sounds fine to me. Also, I thought of Final Fantasy as soon as I saw it, then saw you'd wrote that you'd stole the idea from it xd
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|